Dergiler / BEYOGLU EYE JOURNAL / 2018 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty Using the Big-Bubble Technique in Keratoconus

Sayfa
75–79
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: DALK using the big-bubble technique appears to be a safe and effective procedure in patients with keratoconus.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the visual outcomes and complications of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) performed using the big-bubble technique in patients with keratoconus.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: In this case series, 57 eyes of 57 patients with moderate to advanced keratoconus underwent DALK.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: DALK using the big-bubble technique appears to be a safe and effective procedure in patients with keratoconus.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the visual outcomes and complications of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) performed using the big-bubble technique in patients with keratoconus. Methods: In this case series, 57 eyes of 57 patients with moderate to advanced keratoconus underwent DALK. All of the participants were contact lens-intolerant or had an unacceptable contact lens fitting as a result of advanced keratoconus. DALK was performed using the big-bubble technique. Full thickness donor corneas devoid of Descemet’s membrane were sutured to the recipient bed. Preoperative and postoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), corneal topography, and intra-postoperative complications were evaluated. Results: The mean age of 40 male (70%) and 17 female (30%) patients who had an average follow-up of 48.84±18.12 months (range: 12–60 months) in this study was 28±11.3 years (range: 7–63 years) at the time of the DALK procedure. The mean BSCVA increased from 1.41±0.44 logMAR to 0.87±0.37 logMAR at the final follow-up (p<0.001). The mean preoperative value of flat (K1) and steep (K2) curvature power was 53.5±8.8 diopters (D) and 60.6 ± 8.5 D, respectively, while the postoperative mean K1 and K2 value was 42.8±1.2 D and 46.06±1.3 D. Microperforation was seen in 6 patients (10.5%) during the suturation as an intraoperative complication. Postoperatively, 8 patients (14%) underwent suture revision and 1 patient (0.2%) underwent amniotic membrane transplantation. Conclusion: DALK using the big-bubble technique appears to be a safe and effective procedure in patients with keratoconus.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AHMET, S., BESEK, N. K., AĞCA, A., TAŞKAPILI, M. (2018). Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty Using the Big-Bubble Technique in Keratoconus. BEYOGLU EYE JOURNAL, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 75–79. https://ajindex.com/articles/146239

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (7)

  1. Arnalich-Montiel F, Alió Del Barrio JL, Alió JL. Corneal surgery in keratoconus: which type, which technique, which outcomes? Eye Vis (Lond) 2016;3:2. [CrossRef] Watson SL, Ramsay A, Dart JK, Bunce C, Craig E. Comparison of deep lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty in patients with keratoconus. Ophthalmology 2004;111:1676–82.
  2. Shimmura S, Tsubota K. Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2006;17:349–55. [CrossRef] Benson WH, Goosey CB, Prager TC, Goosey JD. Visual improvement as a function of time after lamellar keratoplasty for keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 1993;116:207–211. [CrossRef] Manche EE, Holland GN, Maloney RK. Deep lamellar keratoplasty using viscoelastic dissection. Arch Ophthalmol 1999;117:1561–5. [CrossRef] Edwards M, Clover GM, Brookes N, Pendergrast D, Chaulk J, McGhee CN. Indications for corneal transplantation in New Zealand: 1991-1999. Cornea 2002;21:152–5. [CrossRef] Terry MA. The evolution of lamellar grafting techniques over twenty-five years. Cornea 2000;19:611–6. [CrossRef] Coombes AG, Kirwan JF, Rostron CK. Deep lamellar keratoplasty with lyophilised tissue in the management of keratoconus. Br J Ophthalmol 2001;85:788–91. [CrossRef] Sugita J, Kondo J. Deep lamellar keratoplasty with complete removal of pathological stroma for vision improvement. Br J Ophthalmol 1997;81:184–8. [CrossRef] Funnell CL, Ball J, Noble BA. Comparative cohort study of the outcomes of deep lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus. Eye 2006;20:527–32. [CrossRef] Karimian F, Feizi S. Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty: Indications, Surgical Techniques and Complications. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 2010;17:28–37.
  3. Watson SL, Tuft SJ, Dart JK. Patterns of rejection after deep lamellar keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 2006;113:556–60.
  4. Romano V, Iovieno A, Parente G, Soldani AM, Fontana L. Longterm clinical outcomes of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty in patients with keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 2015;159:505–11.
  5. Javadi MA, Feizi S, Jamali H, Mirbabaee F. Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty Using the Big-Bubble Technique in Keratoconus. J Ophthalmic Vis Res 2009;4:8–13.
  6. Behesht-Nejad AH, Alimardani A, Amoozadeh J, Hashemi H. Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty Using the Big-bubble Technique. Iranian Journal of Ophthalmology 2009;21:15–22.
  7. Zhang YM, Wu SQ, Yao YF. Long-term comparison of full-bed deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty in treating keratoconus. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 20