KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1

Relationship between place attachment and user satisfaction at some national parks in Turkey

Pınar SIVALIOĞLU
AYŞE LALE BERKÖZ
Sayfa
177–187
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

As a result of the analyses, 4 sub-factors with high reliability values obtained

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Environmental and natural preservation has become a common problem for all societies of this century.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this scope, 5 national parks in Marmara region with different characteristics and highest user density rates have been chosen.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:As a result of the analyses, 4 sub-factors with high reliability values obtained
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Environmental and natural preservation has become a common problem for all societies of this century. Much scientific research is being done and many methods are being devised to analyze the balance between the recreational use and preservation of natural spaces. It appears that the basic purpose of these methods is to achieve recreational satisfaction. User satisfaction is a concept that lies at the core of many sectors and work areas. Place attachment is another concept that has been covered in many research studies conducted until today. Place attachment is a concept that is closely related with satisfaction and includes symbolic and emotional expressions. To see which factors effect visitor satisfaction and attachment will benefit future studies in national parks. In this scope, 5 national parks in Marmara region with different characteristics and highest user density rates have been chosen. The questionnaire forms have been accordingly designed to identify tendencies and evaluate attachment and satisfaction degrees with suitable analysis techniques. The first objective was to identify overall satisfaction and attachment levels and ratings. It was found that the visitors were satisfied with their overall visiting experience and also found that the attachment of the visitors to national parks was high. We observed that as the overall satisfaction increases, the overall attachment increases, as well. Second objective was to determine place attachment and its sub-categories. As a result of the analyses, 4 sub-factors with high reliability values obtained

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SIVALIOĞLU, P., BERKÖZ, A. L. (2016). Relationship between place attachment and user satisfaction at some national parks in Turkey. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1, 177–187. https://ajindex.com/articles/146205

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (6)

  1. Akama, ].S. and Kieti, D.M., (2003). Measuring tourist satisfaction with Kenya’s wildlife safari: case study of Tsavo West National Park. Tourism Management, 24, 73-81.
  2. Berkoz, L., Türk, S.S., Kellekçi, Ö. L. (2009) Environmental Quality and User Satisfaction in Mass Housing Areas: The Case of Istanbul, European Planning Studies, Vol. 17, No: 1, pp. 161—174. Bricker, K.S., and Kerstetter, D., (2000). Level of specialization and place attachment: An exploratory study of whitewater recreationists. Leisure Sciences, 11, 233-257.
  3. Eisenhauer, B. W, Krannich, R. S., and Blahna, D. ]., (2000). Attachments to special places on public lands: An analysis of activities, reason for attachments, and community connections. Society 29* Natural Resources, 13, 421— 441. Halpenny, E., (2006) Ph.D. Environ— mental Behaviour, Place attachment and park visitation: case study of visitors to Point Pelee National Park (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Waterloo, Canada. Hammit, E., Backlund, E. A. and Bixler, R. D., (2006). Place bonding for recreation places: Conceptual and empirical development. Leisure Studies, 25, 17-41.
  4. Hammit, E., Kyle, G. T., and Oh, C., (2009). Comparison of Place Bonding Models in Recreation Resource Management. [ournal of Leisure Research, Vol. 41, No.1, 55-70.
  5. Hidalgo, CM. and Hernandez B., (2001). Place Attachment: Conceptual and Empirical Questions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 273 -281. Hwang, S-N. and Lee, C., C, H-]., (2005). The relationship among tour— ists’ involvement, place attatchment and interpretation satisfaction in Taiwan’s national parks. Tourism Management, 26, 143—156. ]orgensen, B. S., and Stedman, R. C., (2001). Sense of place as an attitude: Lakeshore owners attitudes toward their properties. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 233-248. ]orgensen, B. S., and Stedman, R. C., (2006). comparative analysis of pre— dictors of sense of place dimensions: Attachment to, dependence on, and identification with lakeshore proper— ties. ]ournal of Environmental Management, 79, 316-327.
  6. Kaltenborn, B. P. (1998). Effects of sense of place on responses to en— vironmental impacts: study among residents in Svalbard in the Norwegian high Arctic. Applied Geography, 18(2), 169—189. Kaltenborn, B.P., and Williams D.R., (2002). The meaning of place: Attach— ments to Femundsmarka National Park, Norway, among tourists and lo— cals, Nork Geografik Tidsskrift Norwegian [ournal of Geography, 56:3, 189- 198. Kyle, G., Absher, ]