KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / BEYOGLU EYE JOURNAL / 2018 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

The Effects of Age on Pupil Diameter at Different Light Amplitudes

Hande Hüsniye TELEK
HİDAYET ERDÖL
Adem TÜRK
Sayfa
80–85
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This should be taken into consideration when evaluating pupil reaction.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: This study was an evaluation of pupil response at different light amplitudes in healthy individuals in different age groups.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: A total of 210 eyes of 105 healthy individuals were included in the study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This should be taken into consideration when evaluating pupil reaction.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objectives: This study was an evaluation of pupil response at different light amplitudes in healthy individuals in different age groups. Methods: A total of 210 eyes of 105 healthy individuals were included in the study. The participants were divided into 4 groups at 15-year age intervals: 15-30, 31-45, 46-60, and over 60 years. The dimensions of the pupil were measured with a pupillometer at 5 different light amplitudes: 0, 1, 10, 100, and 200 cd/m2 . The average pupil diameter in the groups was compared and changes in pupil diameter were correlated for each light amplitude according to age. Results: The mean pupil diameter was 4.96+0.82 mm in males, and 4.95+0.87 mm in females at 0 cd/m2 light amplitude, and 2.44+0.19 mm and 2.40+0.19 mm, respectively, at 200 cd/m2 light amplitude. The differences were not statistically significant (p>0.05). In addition, there was no significant difference in pupil size between the right and left eye at any light amplitude (p>0.05). Pupil diameters were found to be smaller at all light amplitudes with advanced age. There was a negative significant correlation between pupil size and age at all light amplitudes (p<0.05). The correlation was stronger at low light amplitudes. Conclusion: Pupil response to light is influenced by age. This should be taken into consideration when evaluating pupil reaction.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

TELEK, H. H., ERDÖL, H., TÜRK, A. (2018). The Effects of Age on Pupil Diameter at Different Light Amplitudes. BEYOGLU EYE JOURNAL, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 80–85. https://ajindex.com/articles/145785

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (8)

  1. Hedges TR, Friedman DI, Horton JC, Newman SA, Striph HGG. Pupil. In: Weingeist TA, Liesegang TJ, Grand MG, eds. Neuroophthalmology. San Francisco: American Academy of Ophthalmology, 2007: 97-100. Glaser JS. The pupils and accommodations. In: Duane TD, Jaeger EA, editors. Clinical Ophthalmology. Philadelphia: Harper & Row; 1984. p. 1–5. Bienfang DC. Neuroophthalmology of the pupil and accommodation. In: Albert DM, Jakobiec FA, editors. Principles and Practice of Ophthalmology. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1994. p. 2470–2. Miller D. Light damage to the eye. In: Yanoff M, Duker JS, editors. Ophthalmology. 2nd ed. St Louis: Mosby; 2004. p. 4–5. Miller D. Optic of the normal human eye. In: Yanoff M, Duker JS, editors. Ophthalmology. 2nd ed. St Louis: Mosby; 2004. p. 1–2. Kadron RH. The pupils. In: Yanoff M, Duker JS, eds. Ophthalmology, 2nd ed. St Louis: Mosby; 2004. p. 1–4.
  2. Campbell FW, Gregory AH. Effect of size of pupil on visual acuity. Nature 1960;187:1121–3. [CrossRef] Bitsios P, Prettyman R, Szabadi E. Changes in autonomic function with age: a study of pupillary kinetics in healthy young and old people. Age Ageing 1996;25:432–8. [CrossRef] Loewenfeld IE. Age changes in pupillary diameter and reactions. In: Thompson SH, Daroff R, Frisen L, Glaser JS, Saunder MD, editors. Topics in neuro-ophthalmology. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1979. p. 124–50.
  3. Netto MV, Ambrósio R Jr, Wilson SE. Pupil size in refractive surgery candidates. J Refract Surg 2004;20:337–42.
  4. Yang Y, Thompson K, Burns SA. Pupil location under mesopic, photopic, and pharmacologically dilated conditions. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43:2508–12.
  5. Semmlow J, Hansmann D, Stark L. Variation in pupillomotor responsiveness with mean pupil size. Vision Res 1975;15:85–90.
  6. Sun F, Tauchi P, Stark L. Dynamic pupillary response controlled by the pupil size effect. Exp Neurol 1983;82:313–24. [CrossRef] Usui S, Stark L. Sensory and motor mechanisms interact to control amplitude of pupil noise. Vision Res 1978;18:505–7.
  7. Kasthurirangan S, Glasser A. Age related changes in the characteristics of the near pupil response. Vision Res 2006;46:1393– 403. [CrossRef] Kadlecova V, Peleska M, Vasko A. Dependence on age of the diameter of the pupil in the dark. Nature 1958;182:1520–1.
  8. Schaeffel F, Wilhelm H, Zrenner E. Inter-individual variability in the dynamics of natural accommodation in humans: relation to age and refractive errors. J Physiol 1993;461:301–20. [CrossRef] Kasthurirangan S, Glasser A. Characteristic