Dergiler / A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 3

Assessing change in quality of life following rehousing from slum settlements to social housing

Sayfa
53–65
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In addition, the study may enable practitioners and policy makers to identify ways of improving the quality of life for social housing residents and the sustainability of new social housing developments.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This article is the result of a study which aimed to evaluate how a group of resettled residents have adapted to their new houses in Istanbul.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:A total of 506 interviews was completed in the districts of Eyup, Kartal and Sisli.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In addition, the study may enable practitioners and policy makers to identify ways of improving the quality of life for social housing residents and the sustainability of new social housing developments.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

This article is the result of a study which aimed to evaluate how a group of resettled residents have adapted to their new houses in Istanbul. The removal of squatter dwellers and their relocation to social housing units affect their quality of life after the removal. To assess the quality of life of residents who have now been living for a long time in social housing after their slums were demolished by the Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality, interviews were conducted with the aid of a questionnaire. A total of 506 interviews was completed in the districts of Eyup, Kartal and Sisli. The results of this research shall serve to provide valuable information, from which improvements in future social housing projects can be made. In the analyses of interview and questionnaire data, seven areas were identified: (1) living conditions, (2) physical factors, (3) environmental factors, (4) comparisons for social relationships, (5) access to services, (6) economic factors, (7) general satisfaction. At the completion of the research, it was found that the users seemed to be more satisfied with the physical factors than the social factors following the demolition of the slums. This study is important insofar as it helps to show that some methods are essential to increase the effectiveness and efficiency of social housing produced by the Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality. In addition, the study may enable practitioners and policy makers to identify ways of improving the quality of life for social housing residents and the sustainability of new social housing developments.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BODUR, A., YÜKSEL, Y. D. (2017). Assessing change in quality of life following rehousing from slum settlements to social housing. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 3, 53–65. https://ajindex.com/articles/145552

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (8)

  1. "LUBT & % 5he quality of life the cities sustainable development in comprehension of current approaches – Kocaeli example, Master’s Thesis, GYTE Institute of Science and Technology, Gebze. Alkıser, Y., and Yurekli, H. (2004). The past, the present and the future of UIFi4UBUF)PVTJOHwJO5VSLFZJUàEFSgisi/a, 3 (1), 63-74.
  2. Andrews, C.J. (2001).
  3. Analyzing Quality of Place, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28 (2),201-217.
  4. Atik, M. (2014). In the context of urban quality of life and urban ıdentity, urban renewal practices in ıstanbul: Sulukule case, Master’s Thesis, Bahcesehir University, Institute of Science and Technology, Istanbul. Bayraktar, E. (2009). The impact of urban transformation applications on social policy, Çerçeve Magazine, 49, 16-22.
  5. Blanc, M. (2010). The Impact of SoDJBM.JY 1PMJDJFT JO 'SBODF Housing Studies, 25 (2), 257-272.
  6. Bodur, A., 2012. Household’s new housing satisfaction after demolition of their gecekondus in Kagithane, Master’s Thesis, Bahcesehir University, (SBEVBUF 4DIPPM PG /BUVSBM BOE "Qplied Sciences, Istanbul. $BNBSHP$BWBMIFJSP % "CJLP A. (2015). Evaluating slum (favela) resettlements: the case of the Serra do Mar Project, Sao Paulo, Brazil, Habitat International, 49 (2015), 340-348.
  7. Cummins, R. A. (1999). A Psychometric Evaluation of The Comprehensive Quality of Life Scale. In L. L. Yuan, B. Yuen, C. Low (Eds.), Urban Quality of Life, Critical Issues and Options (5th FE QQ 4JOHBQPSF /BUJPOBM University of Singapore Press.
  8. Cummins, R.A. (2000). Objective and Subjective Quality of Life: An Interactive Model, Social Indicators Research, 52, 55-72. %JFOFS&4VI&.FBTVSing quality of life: economic, social and subjective indicators, Social Indicators Research, 40 (1), 189–216. %JTTBSU +$4$%FMMFS Quality of life in the planning literature, Journal of Planning Literature. 15 (1), 135–161. %JTTBSU+$BOE4$%FMMFS Quality of life in the planning literature, Journal of Planning Literature. 15 (1), 135–161. %VMHFSPHMV:VLTFM "ZE‘OM‘ 4 BOE Pulat, G., 1996. Quality Problems at.BTT)PVTJOH7PMVNF"O&OWJSPONFOU"OBMZTJTUP2VBMJUBUJWF7BMVFTPO Applications of Mass Housing. Ankara: ćF )PVTJOH %FWFMPQNFOU "ENJOJTtration. &M "SJBOF 4 ". /FJHIborhood Urban Quality of Life GuideMJOFT GPS 6SCBO 1MBOOJOH BOE %FWFMPQNFOU PG /FX "TTFTTNFOU 5PPM (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Cairo University, Egypt. Ersin, G. O. (2012). Urban quality of life indicators: Buyukcekmece case study, Master’s Thesis, Mimar Sinan 'JOF "SUT 6OJWFSTJUZ *OTUJUVUF PG 4D