KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Current Research in Dental Sciences / 2026 / Cilt: 30 Sayı: 1

MAKSİLLADA AÇILI İMPLANTLAR KULLANILARAK YAPILAN İMMEDİAT YÜKLEMENİN KISA DÖNEM SONUÇLARI

Muzaffer Aslan0000-0002-2418-9472
Sayfa
75–82
Yayın Tarihi
2020-01-15
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Bulgular: Hi ç bir implant kaybı g ö rülmezken (%100 sağkalım oranı), bazı hastala r da mukozitis (%22,2) ve periimplantitis (%11,1) kaydedildi .

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Ama ç : Bu ç alışmada, dişsiz maksillaya uygulanan doğrusal ve eğik implantlar üz e rine immediat yüklemenin orta d ö nem komplikasyonlarını değerlendirmektir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Gere ç ve Y ö ntem: 18 hasta ( 8 kadı n ve 10 erkek) ç alışmaya alındı.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Bulgular: Hi ç bir implant kaybı g ö rülmezken (%100 sağkalım oranı), bazı hastala r da mukozitis (%22,2) ve periimplantitis (%11,1) kaydedildi .
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:18 hasta
⚙️Değişkenler:Açılı implantlar · immediat implantasyon

Özet

Ama ç : Bu ç alışmada, dişsiz maksillaya uygulanan doğrusal ve eğik implantlar üz e rine immediat yüklemenin orta d ö nem komplikasyonlarını değerlendirmektir. Gere ç ve Y ö ntem: 18 hasta ( 8 kadı n ve 10 erkek) ç alışmaya alındı. Her hastaya iki doğrusal ve iki açılı implant ile desteklenen bir immediat sabit protez takıldı. Toplam 72 implant yerleştirildi. Ameliyattan 24 saat sonra yükleme yapıldı ve 6 ay sonra d a imi protezler yapı l dı. Hastalar 6, 12, 24, 36. aylarda olmak üzere takip edildi. Her takipte ağız hijyeni kontrol edildi ve her komplikasyon kaydedildi. Bulgular: Hi ç bir implant kaybı g ö rülmezken (%100 sağkalım oranı), bazı hastala r da mukozitis (%22,2) ve periimplantitis (%11,1) kaydedildi . En s ık g ö rülen protetik komplikasyonlar, %33,3 oranında g ö rü len ge ç ici protez fraktürü idi. Hijyenik pro b lemler % 44,4 hastada g ö rüldü ve bunun yanısı ra hi ç bir hasta memnuniyetsizliği kaydedilmedi. Sonu ç : İ mplant sa ğkalım oranının yüksek olması, açılı implantların kullanımının iyi bir s e ç enek olabileceğini g ö stermektedir. Bu sayede greft maliyeti olmamakta ve augmentasyon operasyonlarına da gerek duyulmamaktadır. Çalışmamızda ayrıca, implant ve protez ile ilgili sorunları önlemek i ç in hastaların rutin kontrolünün ve s o runun erken tespitinin ö nemli olduğu g ö rülmektedir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Açılı implantlar, immediat implantasyon, immediat yükleme THE MIDDLE PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF IMMEDIATE LOADING USING TILTED IMPLANTS IN MAXILL A SUMMARY Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the mid-term complications of immediate loa d ing on axial and tilted implants placed to edentulous maxilla. Materials and Methods: Eighteen patients (8 females and 10 males) were included in the study. Immediately loaded fixed prosthesis supported by two axial and two tilted implants were performed for each patient. A total of 72 implants were placed. Loading was pe r formed 24 hours after the operation and final prosthesis was performed after 6 months. Patients were followed up at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months. Oral hygiene was checked at each follow-up and all co m plications were recorded. Results: No implant loss (100% survival rate), mucositis (22.2%) and periimplantitis (11.1%) were recorded in some patients. The most common prosthetic complication w as temporary prosthetic fracture with a rate of 33.3%. Hygienic problems were seen in 44.4% of patients and no patient dissatisfaction was recorded. Conclusion: According the results of the study, use of angled implants may be a good o p tion. In this method, there is no graft cost and augmentation is not required . In our study, it is seen that routine control of the patients and early detection of the problem are important in order to prevent problems related to the implant and prosthesis . Key Words: tilted implants, immediate implantation, immediate loading

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Aslan, M. (2020). MAKSİLLADA AÇILI İMPLANTLAR KULLANILARAK YAPILAN İMMEDİAT YÜKLEMENİN KISA DÖNEM SONUÇLARI. Current Research in Dental Sciences, Cilt: 30 Sayı: 1, 75–82. https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.636943

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (31)

  1. R. Adell, B. Eriksson, U. Lekholm, P. I. Bra ̊nemark, and T. Jemt. Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. The Interna-tional Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 1990; 5, 347– 359. 2- T. Jemt and J. Johansson. Implant treatment in the edentulous maxillae: a 15-year fol-low-up study on 76 consecutive patients provided with fixed prostheses. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 2006; 8, 61-69.
  2. S. S. Wallace and S. J. Froum. Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review. Annals of Periodontology 2003; 8: 328-343.
  3. M. Del Fabbro, G. Rosano, and S. Taschieri. Implant survival rates after maxillary sinus augmentation. European Journal of Oral Sciences 2008; 116: 497-506.
  4. A. Katranji, P. Fotek, and H. L. Wang. Sinus augmentation complications: etiology and treatment. Implant Dentistry 2008; 17: 339-349.
  5. L. Krekmanov, M. Kahn, B. Rangert, and H. Lindstro ̈m. Tilting of posterior mandibular and maxillary implants for improved prosthesis support. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 2000; 15: 405-414.
  6. C. M. Bellini, D. Romeo, F. Galbusera et al. A finite element analysis of tilted versus nontilted implant configurations in the edentulous Maxilla. International Journal of Prosthodontics 2009; 22: 155-157.
  7. L. Francetti, D. Romeo, S. Corbella, S. Taschieri, and M. Del Fabbro. Bone level changes around axial and tilted implants in full-arch fixed immediate restorations. Interim results of a prospective study. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 2012; 14: 646-654.
  8. P. Malo, B. Rangert, and M. Nobre. All-on-4 immediate-function concept with Brane-mark system implants for completely edentulous maxillae: a 1-year retrospective clinical study. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 2005; 7 supp: 88-94.
  9. P. Malo, M. de Araujo Nobre, A. Lopes, C. Francischone, and M. Rigolizzo. “All-on-4” immediate-function concept for completely edentulous maxillae: a clinical report on the medium (3 years) and long-term (5 years) outcomes. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Re-lated Research 2012; 14: 139-150.
  10. O. T. Jensen, M. W. Adams, J. R. Cottam, S. M. Parel, and W. R. Phillips. The all-on-4 shelf: maxilla. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 2010; 68: 2520-2527.
  11. L. Francetti, E. Agliardi, T. Testori, D. Romeo, S. Taschieri, and M. D. Fabbro. Imme-diate rehabilitation of the mandible with fixed full prosthesis supported by axial and tilted implants: interim results of a single cohort prospective study. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 2008; 10: 255-263.
  12. C. A. Babbush, G. T. Kutsko, and J. Brokloff. The all-on- four immediate function treatment concept with NobelActive implants: a retrospective study. The Journal of Oral Implantology 2011; 37: 431-445.
  13. D.S.Penalosa, R.Z.Alonso, M.P.Diago, M.P.Diago. The all-on-four treatment concept: Systematic review. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9(3): 474-488.
  14. T. Albrektsson, G. Zarb, P. Worthington, and A. R. Eriksson. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 1986; 1: 11-25.
  15. C. E. Misch, M. L. Perel, H. L. Wang et al. Implant success, survival, and failure: the International Congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI) pisa consensus conference. Implant Dentistry 2008; 17: 5-15.
  16. I. Kürkçüoğlu, A. Köroğlu, S.E. Özkır. Dental implantlarda başarı kriterleri ve başarı değerlendirme yöntemleri. Atatürk Üniv. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg. 2010; 20:3:221-229.
  17. T.Testori, F.Galli, L.Fumagalli, M.Capelli, F.Zufetti, M.Deflorian, A.Parenti, M.DelFabbro. Assessment of long-term survival of immediately loaded tilted implants sup-porting a maxillary full-arch fixed prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017; 32(4): 904-911.
  18. Z.Gümrükçü, Y.T. Korkmaz, F.M.Korkmaz. Biomechanical evaluation of implant-supported prosthesis with various tilting implant angles and bone types in atrophic maxilla: A finite element study. Comput Biol Med. 2017; 1(86):47-54.
  19. Hamed HA, Marzook HA, Ghoneem NE, El-Anwar MI. Angulated dental implants in posterior maxilla FEA and experimental verification. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018 Feb 14; 6(2): 397-401.
  20. K.A.A.Alccayhuaman, D.S.Penalosa, Y.Nakajima, S.N.Papagergiou, D.Boticelli, N.P.Lang. Biological and technical complications of tilted implants in comparison with straight implants supporting fixed dental prosthesis. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29 Suppl118: 295-308.
  21. R. Crespi, R. Vinci, P. Cappare ́, G. E. Romanos, and E. Gher- lone. A clinical study of edentulous patients rehabilitated according to the “all on four” immediate function protocol. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 2012; 27: 428-434.
  22. S.Graves, B.A.Mahler, B.Javid, D.Armellini and O.T.Jensen. Maxillary all-on-four ther-apy using angled implants: a 16- month clinical study of 1110 implants in 276 jaws. Dental Clinics of North America 2011; 55: 779-794.
  23. J.C.C.Epinosa, R.C.Oyagüe, M.A.S.Figallo, R.G.Serrano, C.D.Lynch, M.M.Collar, D.T.Lagares, J.L.G.Perez. Combination of straight and tilted implants for supporting screw-retained dental prostheses in atrophic posterior maxillae: A 2-year prospective study. J Dent 2017;63:85-93.
  24. Apaza Alccayhuaman KA, Soto-Penaloza D, Nakajima Y, Papageorgiou SN, Boticelli D, Lang NP. Biological and technical complications of tilted implants in comparison with straight implants supporting fixed dental prostheses. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 18: 295-308.
  25. Testori T, Galli F, Fumagalli L, Capelli M, Zufetti F, Deflorian M, Parenti A, Del Fabbro M. Assessment of long-term survival of immediately loaded tilted implants supporting a maxillary full-arch fixed prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2017 Jul / Aug; 32 (4): 904-911.
  26. Gintatue A, Papatriantafyllou N, Aljehani M, Att W. Accuracy of computerized and conventional impression-making procedures for multiple straight and tilted dental implants. Int J Esthet Dent 2018; 13 (4): 550-565.
  27. Malo P, de Araujo Nobre M, Lopes A, Ferro A, Nunes M. The All-on-4 concept for full-arch rehabilitation of the edentulous maxillae: A longitudinal study with 5-13 years of fol-low-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2019 Mar 28 (Epub ahead of print).
  28. Soto-Penaloza D, Zaragozi -Alonso R, Penarrocha-Diago M. The all-on-four treatment concept: Systematic review. J Clin Exp Dent 2017 Mar 1; 9(3): 474-488.
  29. S. Corbella, M. Del Fabbro, S. Taschieri, F. De Siena, and L. Francetti. Clinical evaluation of an implant maintenance protocol for the prevention of peri-implant diseases in patients treated with immediately loaded full-arch rehabilitations. International Journal of Dental Hygiene 2011; 9: 216-222.
  30. S.Ergun, A.Çekici, A.Saruhanoğlu, O.Kazancıoğlu, A.Uzman, G.Ak, H.Tanyeri. Dental implantlar ile rehabilite edilmiş hastaların memnuniyet derecelerinin değerlendirilmesi. Atatürk Üniv. Diş Tek. Fak. Derg. 2009; 19:3:181-186.
  31. Hamed HA, Marzook HA, Ghoneem NE, El-Anwar MI. Angulated dental implants in posterior maxilla FEA and experimental verification. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018 Feb 14; 6(2): 397-401.