KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Asya Öğretim Dergisi / 2024 / Volume: 12 Issue: 2

Teacher Autonomy from the Perspective of Middle School Teachers

Feryad Doğuş(Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı)0009-0005-7900-5270
Sanem Tabak(ORDU ÜNİVERSİTESİ, EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-8905-4042
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2024-12-31
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In this context, it was concluded that social and environmental factors, personal and professional characteristics, and institutional and system factors are among the factors that affect teacher autonomy.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study aims to examine middle school teachers' perceptions of teacher autonomy in depth.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The study participants were 17 middle school teachers working in public schools in three provinces located in northern Turkey.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In this context, it was concluded that social and environmental factors, personal and professional characteristics, and institutional and system factors are among the factors that affect teacher autonomy.
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Factors affecting teacher autonomy · middle school teachers · teacher autonomy

Abstract

This study aims to examine middle school teachers' perceptions of teacher autonomy in depth. The study was conducted using a phenomenological design, a qualitative research method. The study participants were 17 middle school teachers working in public schools in three provinces located in northern Turkey. Data were obtained through semi-structured interviews. The results showed that teachers defined the concept of autonomy in the context of autonomy in the educational process, professional development, professional respectability, and freedom of expression. Teachers emphasized that autonomous teachers have characteristics such as pedagogical freedom and creativity, using technology, student orientation, critical and analytical thinking, independence and self-confidence, content knowledge and research ability, social and communication skills, leadership, and problem-solving. Finally, the factors affecting teachers' autonomy were analyzed. In this context, it was concluded that social and environmental factors, personal and professional characteristics, and institutional and system factors are among the factors that affect teacher autonomy.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Doğuş, F., Tabak, S. (2024). Teacher Autonomy from the Perspective of Middle School Teachers. Asya Öğretim Dergisi, Volume: 12 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.47215/aji.1559266

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (63)

  1. Akçay, P., & Sevinç, H. H. (2021). A study on perceived management styles of school administrators and autonomy of teachers. Gazi University Gazi Faculty of Education Journal, 41(2), 1173-1201. https://doi.org/10.17152/gefad.906997
  2. Ayral, M., Özdemir, N., Türedi, A., Fındık, L. Y., Büyükgöze, H., Demirezen, S., & Tahirbegi, Y. (2014). The relationship between teacher autonomy and student achievement: PISA sample. Journal of Educational Science Research, 4(1), 207-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.12973/jesr.2014.4os12a
  3. Benson, P. (2000). Autonomy as a learners’ and teachers’ right. In Barbara Sinclair, Ian McGrath & Terry Lamb (Eds.), Learner autonomy, teacher autonomy: Future directions. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
  4. Benson, P. (2010). Teacher education and teacher autonomy: Creating spaces for experimentation in secondary school English language teaching. Language Teaching Research, 14(3), 259–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810365236
  5. Boz, M. S. (2014). The opinions of high school teachers in Ankara province in relation to teacher autonomy and teacher self-efficacy (Unpublished master thesis). Ankara University, Ankara.
  6. Creswell, J. W. (2020). Qualitative research methods: Qualitative research and research design according to five approaches (5th ed.) (Trans. Ed: M. Bütün & S. B. Demir). Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi.
  7. Crookes, G. (1997). What influences what and how second and foreign language teachers teach? The Modern Language Journal, 81(1), 67-99.
  8. Çelik, S. (2016). A study of the relationship between distributed leadership in official high schools and teacher autonomy based on teachers' opinions (Elazig sample) (Unpublished master thesis). Hacettepe University, Ankara.
  9. Çolak, İ. (2016). The relationship between school climate and teacher autonomy (Muğla sample) (Unpublished master thesis). Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Muğla.
  10. Çolak, İ., Altınkurt, Y., & Yılmaz, K. (2017). The relationship between teachers' autonomy behaviors and job satisfaction. The Black Sea Journal of Social Sciences, 9(2), 189-208.
  11. Çolak, İ., & Altınkurt, Y. (2017). The relationship between school climate and teacher autonomy behaviors. Educational Administration Theory and Practice, 23(1), 33-71.
  12. Dieudé, A., & Prøitz, T. S. (2024). Curriculum policy and instructional planning: Teachers’ autonomy across various school contexts. European Educational Research Journal, 23(1), 28-47. https://doi.org/10.1177/14749041221075156
  13. Erbıyık, S., & Şemin, F. K. (2024). The examination of teachers' professional autonomy. The Journal of Buca Faculty of Education, 59, 325-349.
  14. Ertürk, R. (2020). Teacher autonomy: A conceptual review. International Pegem Conference on Education (IPCEDU 2020) Ebook (pp. 581-591). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  15. Ertürk, R. (2023). The effect of teacher autonomy on teachers' professional dedication. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 10(2), 494-507. https://dx.doi.org/10.52380/ijpes.2023.10.2.1048
  16. Eurydice. (2008). Levels of autonomy and responsibilities of teachers in Europe. Retrieved 01.09.2024 from https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/b36880f0-c8be-4517-a3d0-e4a23dc6f323/language-en
  17. Frase, L. E., & Sorenson, L. (1992). Teacher motivation and satisfaction: Impact on participatory management. Nassp Bulletin, 76(540), 37-43. https://doi.org/10.1177/019263659207654007
  18. Friedman, I. A. (1999). Teacher-perceived work autonomy: The concept and its measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59(1), 58-76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164499591005
  19. Garvin, N. M. (2007). Teacher autonomy: distinguishing perceptions by school cultural characteristics (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Pennsylvania, USA.
  20. Gürsoy, F. (2020). Middle school teachers' perception levels of teacher autonomy (Unpublished master thesis). Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir.
  21. Huang, J. (2005). Teacher autonomy in language learning: A review of the research. In K. R. Katyal, H. C. Lam, & X. J. Ding (Eds.), Research studies in education (pp. 203–218). Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong.
  22. Ingersoll, R. M. (2007). Short on power long on responsibility. Educational Leadership, 65(1), 20-25.
  23. Jeong, D. W., & Luschei, T. F. (2018). Are teachers losing control of the classroom? Global changes in school governance and teacher responsibilities, 2000–2015. International Journal of Educational Development, 62, 289-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2018.07.004
  24. Jerrim, J., Morgan, A., & Sims, S. (2023). Teacher autonomy: Good for pupils? Good for teachers? British Educational Research Journal, 49(6), 1187-1209. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3892
  25. Karatay, M., Günbey, M., & Taş, M. (2020). The relationship between teacher professionalism and autonomy. Munzur University Journal of Social Sciences, 9(2), 173-195.
  26. Kılınç, A. Ç., Bozkurt, E., & İlhan, H. (2018). Examining teachers’ opinions on teacher autonomy. Journal of Education and Humanities: Theory and Practice, 9(18), 77-98.
  27. LaCoe III, C. S. (2008). Teacher autonomy. A multifaceted approach for the new millennium. amherst. New York: Cambria Press.
  28. La Ganza, W. (2008). Learner autonomy–teacher autonomy. Learner and teacher autonomy: Concepts, realities, and responses. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
  29. Lai-ngok, J, W. (2004). School autonomy in China: a comparison between government and private schools within the context of decentralization. International Studies of Educational Administration, 32(3), 54-73.
  30. Lamb, T. (2008). Learner autonomy and teacher autonomy. Synthesizing an agenda. https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.1.21lam
  31. Lawson, T. (2004). Teacher autonomy: Power or control? Education 3-13, 32(3), 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004270485200261
  32. Lennert Da Silva, A. L. (2022). Comparing teacher autonomy in different models of educational governance. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 8(2), 103-118. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2021.1965372
  33. Liu, S., Keeley, J. W., Sui, Y., & Sang, L. (2021). Impact of distributed leadership on teacher job satisfaction in China: The mediating roles of teacher autonomy and teacher collaboration. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 71, 101099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101099
  34. Little, D. (1995). Learning as dialogue: The dependence of learner autonomy on teacher autonomy. System 23, 2, 175-182.
  35. Maviş Sevim, F. Ö., Yazıcı, L., & Maviş, R. (2017). Comparison of school and teacher autonomy in Turkey and European countries. Route Educational and Social Science Journal, 4(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.17121/ressjournal.595
  36. McGrath, I. (2000). Teacher autonomy. In B. Sinclair, I. Mcgrath & E. Lamb (Eds.), Learner Autonomy, Teacher Autonomy: Future Directions (pp. 100-110). Longman.
  37. Ministry of National Education. (2017). General competencies for teaching profession. Directorate General for Teacher Training and Development. Retrieved from: https://oygm.meb.gov.tr/dosyalar/StPrg/Ogretmenlik_Meslegi_Genel_Yeterlikleri.pdf
  38. Melenyzer, B. J. (1990). Teacher empowerment: The discourse, meaning, and social actions of teachers. National Council on States on Inservice Education, Orlando: Florida.
  39. Merriam, S. B. (2015). A guide to qualitative research-pattern and practice (S. Turan, Trans.). Ankara: Nobel.
  40. Oğuz, A. (2013). Teacher’s views about supporting learner autonomy. International Journal of Human Sciences, 10(1), 1273-1297.
  41. Öksüz Gül, F. (2015). An analysis on teacher autonomy in the context of educational leadership (Unpublished master thesis). Marmara University, İstanbul.
  42. Özaslan, G. (2015). Teachers‟ perceptions of the level of their professional autonomy. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 3(2), 25-39. https://doi.org/10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.3c2s2m
  43. Öztürk, İ. H. (2011). A conceptual analysis on teacher autonomy. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences 10(35), 82-99.
  44. Parker, G. (2015). Teachers' autonomy. Research in Education, 93(1), 19-33. https://doi.org/10.7227/RIE.0008
  45. Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (M. Bütün & S. B. Demir, Trans. Ed.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  46. Paulsrud, D., & Wermke, W. (2019). Decision-making in context: Swedish and Finnish teachers’ perceptions of autonomy. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 51(3), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2019.1596975
  47. Pearson, L. C., & Moomaw, W. (2005). The relationship between teacher autonomy and stress, work satisfaction, empowerment, and professionalism. Educational research quarterly, 29(1), 38-54.
  48. Pearson, L. C., ve Hall, B. W. (1993). Initial construct validation of the teaching autonomy scale. Journal of Educational Research, 86(3), 172-178. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/00220671.1993.9941155
  49. Phan, T. T. T. (2012). Teacher autonomy and learner autonomy: an east Asian’s perspective. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 2(6), 468-481. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJSSH.2012.V2.149
  50. Ramos, R. C. (2006). Considerations on the role of teacher autonomy. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 183-202. https://doi.org/10.14483/22487085.10510
  51. Sehrawat, J. (2014). Teacher autonomy: Key to teaching success. Bhartiyam International Journal of Education & Research, 4(1), 1-8.
  52. Short, P. M. (1994). Defining teacher empowerment. Education 114(4), 488–493.
  53. Smith, R. (2000). Strating with outselves: Teacher-learner autonomy in language learning. In Sinclair, B., McGrath, I., & Lamb, T. (Eds.), Learner autonomy, teacher autonomy: Future directions (pp. 89-99). Edinburg Gate, Harlow: Pearson.
  54. Smith, R., Erdoğan, S., Lamb, T., & Reinders, H. (2008). Teacher-learner autonomy. In T. Lamb & H. Reinders (Eds.), Learner and teacher autonomy (pp. 83-102). John Benjamins Publising.
  55. Strong, L. (2012). A psychometric study of the teacher work-autonomy scale with a sample of U.S. teachers (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Lehigh University, USA.
  56. Şentürken, C. (2018). The relationship between secondary school teachers’ autonomy behavior and job satisfaction (Unpublished master thesis). Dumlupınar University, Kütahya.
  57. Taba, H. (1962). Curriculum development: Theory and practice. Harcourt Brace Jovanovıch, Inc.
  58. Taşdemircanan, A. (2023). An analysis of perceived autonomy of teachers and their curriculum literacy levels (Unpublished master thesis). Sivas Cumhuriyet University, Sivas.
  59. Tokgöz, C. M. (2019). A study on autonomy perceptions and expectations of teachers in planning and implementing of teaching (Unpublished master thesis). Ege University, İzmir.
  60. Üzüm, P. (2014). Assessment of the structural and individual dimensions of grade teacher’s awareness level of teacher autonomy (Case of İzmir) (Unpublished doctoral dissertations). Çanakkale 18 Mart University, Çanakkale.
  61. Willner, R. G. (1990). Images of the future now: Autonomy, professionalism, and efficacy (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Fordham University.
  62. Worth, J., & Van den Brande, J. (2020). Teacher autonomy: How does it relate to job satisfaction and retention? National Foundation for Educational Research. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED604418.pdf
  63. Yoon, J., & Thye, S. R. (2002). A dual process model of organizational commitment: Job satisfaction and organizational support. Work and Occupations, 29, 97-124. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1177/0730888402029001005