KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Anatolian Current Medical Journal / 2026 / Volume: 7 Issue: 4

MRI morphometric analysis of anatomical structures affecting transsphenoidal surgery in acromegaly

Gönül Güvenç(MUGLA SITKI KOCMAN UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-9382-8610
Güven Gürsoy(MUGLA SITKI KOCMAN UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-8374-7916
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2025-07-28
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: Since there are anatomical differences in acromegalic pituitary adenoma patients, variations of these anatomical structures should be defined and approaches should be adapted in transsphenoidal surgeries.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aims: Functional pituitary adenomas such as acromegaly or Cushing adenoma can cause endocrinopathies and affect tissues.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: We investigated magnetic resonance scannings of 20 acromegalic pituitary adenoma patients preoperatively and 20 control patients.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: Since there are anatomical differences in acromegalic pituitary adenoma patients, variations of these anatomical structures should be defined and approaches should be adapted in transsphenoidal surgeries.
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Acromegaly · morphometric analysis · transsphenoidal surgery

Özet

Aims: Functional pituitary adenomas such as acromegaly or Cushing adenoma can cause endocrinopathies and affect tissues. These functional pituitary adenomas can cause anatomical variations by tissue hypertrophy. The aim of this study is to reveal differences of anatomical structures on the surgical route between normal patients and acromegalic pituitary microadenoma patients via magnetic resonance imaging scanning of pituitary gland. Methods: We investigated magnetic resonance scannings of 20 acromegalic pituitary adenoma patients preoperatively and 20 control patients. Carotid canal width, pyriform apical width, concha widths, frontal skin thicknesses, lip thickness and nasal heights were compared. Results: Pyriform aperture widths were 22.76±0.94 mm in acromegalic patients and 21.80±0.53 mm in normal patients, concha widths were 9.38±1.22 mm in acromegalic patients and 7.98±0.78 mm in normal patients, frontal skin thicknesses were 6.77±0.38 mm in acromegalic patients and 4.94±1.03 mm in normal patients, lip thicknesses were found as 5.10±0.55 mm in acromegalic patient and 4.18±0.77 mm in normal patients, nasal heights were found as 49.8±0.89 mm in acromegalic patients and 48.88±3.97 mm in normal patients and these differences were statistically significant (p<0.05). Conclusion: Since there are anatomical differences in acromegalic pituitary adenoma patients, variations of these anatomical structures should be defined and approaches should be adapted in transsphenoidal surgeries.

Abstract

Aims: Functional pituitary adenomas such as acromegaly or Cushing adenoma can cause endocrinopathies and affect tissues. These functional pituitary adenomas can cause anatomical variations by tissue hypertrophy. The aim of this study is to reveal differences of anatomical structures on the surgical route between normal patients and acromegalic pituitary microadenoma patients via magnetic resonance imaging scanning of pituitary gland. Methods: We investigated magnetic resonance scannings of 20 acromegalic pituitary adenoma patients preoperatively and 20 control patients. Carotid canal width, pyriform apical width, concha widths, frontal skin thicknesses, lip thickness and nasal heights were compared. Results: Pyriform aperture widths were 22.76±0.94 mm in acromegalic patients and 21.80±0.53 mm in normal patients, concha widths were 9.38±1.22 mm in acromegalic patients and 7.98±0.78 mm in normal patients, frontal skin thicknesses were 6.77±0.38 mm in acromegalic patients and 4.94±1.03 mm in normal patients, lip thicknesses were found as 5.10±0.55 mm in acromegalic patient and 4.18±0.77 mm in normal patients, nasal heights were found as 49.8±0.89 mm in acromegalic patients and 48.88±3.97 mm in normal patients and these differences were statistically significant (p<0.05). Conclusion: Since there are anatomical differences in acromegalic pituitary adenoma patients, variations of these anatomical structures should be defined and approaches should be adapted in transsphenoidal surgeries.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Güvenç, G., Gürsoy, G. (2025). MRI morphometric analysis of anatomical structures affecting transsphenoidal surgery in acromegaly. Anatolian Current Medical Journal, Volume: 7 Issue: 4. https://doi.org/10.38053/acmj.1697787

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (23)

  1. Netuka D, Majovsky M, Masopust V, et al. Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging during endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery of growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas. World Neurosurg. 2016; 91:490-496. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2016.04.094
  2. Colao A, Ferone D, Marzullo P, Lombardi G. Systemic complications of acromegaly: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and management. Endocr Rev. 2004;25(1):102-152. doi:10.1210/er.2002-0022
  3. Potorac I, Petrossians P, Daly AF, et al. Pituitary MRI characteristics in 297 acromegaly patients based on T2-weighted sequences. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2015;22(2):169-177. doi:10.1530/ERC-14-0305
  4. Carrabba G, Locatelli M, Mattei L, et al. Transphenoidal surgery in acromegalic patients: anatomical considerations and potential pitfalls. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2013;155(1):125-130. doi:10.1007/s00701-012-1527-6
  5. Ebner FH, Kuerschner V, Dietz K, Bueltmann E, Naegele T, Honegger J. Reduced intercarotid artery distance in acromegaly: pathophysiologic considerations and implications for transsphenoidal surgery. Surg Neurol. 2009;72(5):456-460. doi:10.1016/j.surneu.2009.07.006
  6. Saeki N, Yamaura A, Iuchi T, Sunami K. Bone window CT evaluation on nasal cavity for transsphenoidal reoperations: a sequel to a previous publication. Br J Neurosurg. 2000;14(4):379-381.
  7. Zada G, Cavallo LM, Esposito F, et al. Transsphenoidal surgery in patients with acromegaly: operative strategies for overcoming technically challenging anatomical variations. Neurosurg Focus. 2010; 29(4):E8. doi:10.3171/2010.8.FOCUS10156
  8. Laws ER Jr. Vascular complications of transsphenoidal surgery. Pituitary. 1999;2(2):163-170. doi:10.1023/a:1009951917649
  9. Fukushima T, Maroon JC. Repair of carotid artery perforations during transsphenoidal surgery. Surg Neurol. 1998;50(2):174-177. doi:10.1016/s0090-3019(96)00416-8
  10. Takahara K, Tamura R, Isomura E, Kitamura Y, Ueda R, Toda M. Variable anatomical features of acromegaly in the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses: implications for endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024;166(1):408. doi:10.1007/s00701-024-06307-4
  11. Perondi GE, Isolan GR, de Aguiar PH, Stefani MA, Falcetta EF. Endoscopic anatomy of sellar region. Pituitary. 2013;16(2):251-259. doi: 10.1007/s11102-012-0413-9
  12. Mascarella MA, Forghani R, Di Maio S, et al. Indicators of a reduced intercarotid artery distance in patients undergoing endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2015;76(3):195-201. doi:10.1055/s-0034-1396601
  13. Kuan EC, Yoo F, Kim W, et al. Anatomic variations in pituitary endocrinopathies: implications for the surgical corridor. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2017;78(2):105-111. doi:10.1055/s-0036-1585588
  14. Gardner PA, Tormenti MJ, Pant H, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Snyderman CH, Horowitz MB. Carotid artery injury during endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: incidence and outcomes. Neurosurgery. 2013;73(2 Suppl Operative):ons261-9;discussion ons269-70. doi:10.1227/01.neu. 0000430821.71267.f2
  15. Abuzayed B, Tanriöver N, Ozlen F, et al. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach to the sellar region: results of endoscopic dissection on 30 cadavers. Turk Neurosurg. 2009;19(3):237-244.
  16. Hamid O, El Fiky L, Hassan O, Kotb A, El Fiky S. Anatomic variations of the sphenoid sinus and their impact on trans-sphenoid pituitary surgery. Skull Base. 2008;18(1):9-15. doi:10.1055/s-2007-992764
  17. Tomovic S, Esmaeili A, Chan NJ, et al. High-resolution computed tomography analysis of variations of the sphenoid sinus. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2013;74(2):82-90. doi:10.1055/s-0033-1333619
  18. Ebner FH, Kürschner V, Dietz K, Bültmann E, Nägele T, Honegger J. Craniometric changes in patients with acromegaly from a surgical perspective. Neurosurg Focus. 2010;29(4):E3. doi:10.3171/2010.7.FOCUS 10152
  19. Van Alyea OE. Sphenoid sinus: anatomic study, with consideration of the clinical significance of the structural characteristics of the sphe noid sinus. Arch Otolaryngol. 1941;34(2):225-253. doi:10.1001/archotol.1941. 00660040251002
  20. Kim HU, Kim SS, Kang SS, Chung IH, Lee JG, Yoon JH. Surgical anatomy of the natural ostium of the sphenoid sinus. Laryngoscope. 2001;111(9):1599-1602. doi:10.1097/00005537-200109000-00020
  21. Castle-Kirszbaum M, Uren B, Goldschlager T. Anatomic variation for the endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach. World Neurosurg. 2021;156:111-119. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2021.09.103
  22. Wolf P, Salenave S, Durand E, et al. Treatment of acromegaly has substantial effects on body composition: a long-term follow-up study. Eur J Endocrinol. 2021;186(2):173-181. doi:10.1530/EJE-21-0900
  23. Amaro AC, Duarte FH, Jallad RS, Bronstein MD, Redline S, Lorenzi-Filho G. The use of nasal dilator strips as a placebo for trials evaluating continuous positive airway pressure. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2012;67(5):469-474. doi:10.6061/clinics/2012(05)11