KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2020 / Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 2

Reliability and validation of the Turkish version of the Low Back Outcome Score

Ghofran ALHOMEDAH
Seyit ÇITAKER
Gürkan GÜNAYDIN
Refia SEZER
Furqan KHAN
Sayfa
161–167
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: The Turkish version of the LBOS questionnaire appeared to be a valid and reliable outcome measure.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: This study aimed to validate the Turkish version of the Low Back Outcome Score and check its reliability in patients with chronic low back pain (LBP).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: Overall, 105 patients [81 women and 24 men; mean age: 49.5 years (18–65 years)] with a complaint of LBP for at least 3 months were included in this study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: The Turkish version of the LBOS questionnaire appeared to be a valid and reliable outcome measure.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: This study aimed to validate the Turkish version of the Low Back Outcome Score and check its reliability in patients with chronic low back pain (LBP). Methods: Overall, 105 patients [81 women and 24 men; mean age: 49.5 years (18–65 years)] with a complaint of LBP for at least 3 months were included in this study. Test-retest reliability was assessed after 7 days. Overall score of LBOS was compared with the overall scores of “Rolland-Morris Disability Questionnaire,” “Oswestry Disability Index,” “Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale,” “SF36,” and “Bournemouth Questionnaire for Back Pain” to calculate the convergent validity by using Pearson correlation coefficient. Results: The questionnaire was noted to have high internal consistency. The test-retest analysis revealed an excellent correlation (ICC=0.80). Pearson correlation coefficient of the LBOS was assessed using VAS and had an excellent correlation with all the questionnaires included in this study. Conclusion: The Turkish version of the LBOS questionnaire appeared to be a valid and reliable outcome measure.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ALHOMEDAH, G., ÇITAKER, S., GÜNAYDIN, G., SEZER, R., KHAN, F. (2020). Reliability and validation of the Turkish version of the Low Back Outcome Score. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 2, 161–167. https://ajindex.com/articles/144902

Kaynakça (16)

  1. Lively MW. Sports medicine approach to low back pain. South Med J 2002
  2. [CrossRef] 2. Luo X, Pietrobon R, Sun SX, Liu GG, Hey L. Estimates and patterns of direct health care expenditures among individuals with back pain in the United States. Spine 2004
  3. [CrossRef] 3. Hart LG, Deyo RA, Cherkin DC. Physician office visits for low back pain: Frequency, clinical evaluation, and treatment patterns from a US national survey. Spine 1995
  4. [CrossRef] 4. Frymoyer JW. Back pain and sciatica. N Engl J Med 1988
  5. [CrossRef] 5. Gilgil E, Kaçar C, Bütün B, et al. Prevalence of low back pain in a developing urban setting. Spine 2005
  6. [CrossRef] 6. Greenough CG, Fraser RD. Assessment of outcome in patients with low-back pain. Spine 1992
  7. [CrossRef] 7. Deyo RA. Measuring the functional status of patients with low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1988
  8. Oksuz E. Prevalence, risk factors, and preference-based health states of low back pain in a Turkish population. Spine 2006
  9. [CrossRef] 9. Gunaydin G, Citaker S, Meray J, Cobanoglu G, Gunaydin OE, Kanik ZH. Reliability, validity, and cross-cultural adaptation of the Turkish version of the Bournemouth Questionnaire. Spine 2016
  10. [CrossRef] 10. Yakut E, Düger T, Oksüz C, et al. Validation of the Turkish version of the Oswestry Disability Index for patients with low back pain. Spine 2004
  11. [CrossRef] 11. Küçükdeveci AA, Tennant A, Elhan AH, Niyazoglu H. Validation of the Turkish version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire for use in low back pain. Spine 2001
  12. [CrossRef] 12. Melikoglu MA, Kocabas H, Sezer I, Bilgilisoy M, Tuncer T. Validation of the Turkish version of the Quebec back pain disability scale for patients with low back pain. Spine 2009
  13. [CrossRef] 13. Kocyigit H. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of ShortForm-36 (SF-36). Turkish Journal Drugs Therap 1999
  14. Holt AE, Shaw NJ, Shetty A, Greenough CG. The reliability of the Low Back Outcome Score for back pain. Spine 2002
  15. [CrossRef] 15. Misterska E, Jankowski R, Glowacki M. Quebec back pain disability scale, low back outcome score and revised oswestry low back pain disability scale for patients with low back pain due to degenerative disc disease: Evaluation of Polish versions. Spine 2011
  16. E1722-9. [CrossRef] 16. Azimi P, Aghaei HN, Azhari S, et al. An outcome measure of funct