Dergiler / Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics / 2017 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 4

A hybrid multi-objective algorithm to predict the characteristics of soil profiles from seismic ground motion records

Sayfa
138–150
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Moreover, neither the growing number of parameters nor the vastness of the search space reduces the efficiency of the algorithm in predicting the characteristics of soil profiles and site amplification commonly required in seismic risk mitigation.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The underlying goal of this study is to present an efficient algorithm to identify soil parameters such as thicknesses, shear wave velocities, damping and others parameters of subsurface layers, and site amplification characteristics (natural frequencies, peak amplitudes) from a given pair of seismic records.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:To improve the performance of the global search phase, a multi-objective optimization algorithm is used to minimize the errors between some characteristics of the theoretical amplification function and the experimental one of vertical array records.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Moreover, neither the growing number of parameters nor the vastness of the search space reduces the efficiency of the algorithm in predicting the characteristics of soil profiles and site amplification commonly required in seismic risk mitigation.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

The underlying goal of this study is to present an efficient algorithm to identify soil parameters such as thicknesses, shear wave velocities, damping and others parameters of subsurface layers, and site amplification characteristics (natural frequencies, peak amplitudes) from a given pair of seismic records. It is a hybrid procedure combining the stochastic genetic algorithms (GAs) optimization method, to find a point close to the global optimum in the global search phase, and a gradient based local determinist method (Levenberg-Marquardt: LM), to refine the solution. To improve the performance of the global search phase, a multi-objective optimization algorithm is used to minimize the errors between some characteristics of the theoretical amplification function and the experimental one of vertical array records. The weighted sum method which combines the weighted objectives into a single objective function is used to solve the optimization problem. The efficiency of the present algorithm is proven by several examples. Results show that the scheme works well and the curve fitting was always satisfying. Also, the proposed procedure leads to good approximations, requiring a lower computational effort, yet with good rates of convergence. Moreover, neither the growing number of parameters nor the vastness of the search space reduces the efficiency of the algorithm in predicting the characteristics of soil profiles and site amplification commonly required in seismic risk mitigation.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

HARİCHANE, Z., KHELLAFİ, M. A., SADOUKİ, A. (2017). A hybrid multi-objective algorithm to predict the characteristics of soil profiles from seismic ground motion records. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 4, 138–150. https://ajindex.com/articles/144846

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Deb K (2001). Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, NY, USA. Djilali Berkane H, Khellafi MA, Harichane Z, Kouici W (2014). Stochastic study of the spatial variation of ground response spectrum. Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 19, 4345-4361.
  2. Dunning T (1998). Recorded Step Directional Mutation for Faster Convergence. In Evolutionary Programming VII. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Germany. Guellil ME, Harichane Z, Djilali Berkane H, Sadouki A (2017). Soil and structure uncertainty effects on the soil-foundation-structure dynamic response. Earthquakes and Structures, 12(2), 153-163.
  3. Goldberg DE (1989).
  4. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc. Boston, MA, USA. Govindaraju L, Bhattacharya S (2012). Site-specific earthquake response study for hazard assessment in Kolkata city, India. Natural Hazards, 61(3), 943–965.
  5. Harichane Z, Afra H, Elachachi SM (2005). An identification procedure of soil profile characteristics from two free field accelerometer records. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 25(6), 431-438.
  6. Harichane Z, Afra H, Bahar R (2012). Experimental validation of an identification procedure of soil profile characteristics from free field acceleration records, International Journal of Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, 3(1), 1-17.
  7. Ince GC (2011). The relationship between the performance of soil conditions and damage following an earthquake: a case study in Istanbul, Turkey. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 11(6), 1745-1758.
  8. Jones AL, Kramer SL, Arduino P (2002). Estimation of uncertainty in geotechnical properties for performance-based earthquake engineering. PEER Report 16, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, USA. Kao CY, Chung JK, Yeh YT (2010). A comparative study of the least squares method and the genetic algorithm in deducing peak ground acceleration attenuation relationships. Terrestrial, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, 21(6), 869-878.
  9. Khellafi MA, Harichane Z, Hamid A, Sadouki A (2013). A case study of accelerometric records analysis of May 21st, 2003, Boumerdes (Algeria) Earthquake. International Journal of Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, 4(2), 34-52.
  10. Khellafi MA, Harichane Z, Hamid A, Erken A (2016). Prediction of parameters of soil stratums and earthen dams from free field acceleration records. International Journal of Geotechnical Earth