Dergiler / Central Bank Review / 2016 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 4

Responsiveness of monetary policy to financial stress in Turkey

Sayfa
143–150
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The objective of this paper is to investigate whether the Central Bank of Turkey (CBRT) was responsive to financial stress or not during the period 2005m1e2015m10.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The responsiveness of the CBRT to financial stress is measured by a generic policy interest rate, comprising of the overnight rate, BIST interbank rate and weighted average funding rate.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2010 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to investigate whether the Central Bank of Turkey (CBRT) was responsive to financial stress or not during the period 2005m1e2015m10. The study is unique in the sense that CBRT's monetary policy reaction function is augmented with a distinctive financial stress index, i.e. the composite index of systemic stress (CISS). The index pays special attention to the systemic risk component of financial markets by taking into account the cross-correlations between financial market segments. The responsiveness of the CBRT to financial stress is measured by a generic policy interest rate, comprising of the overnight rate, BIST interbank rate and weighted average funding rate. CBRT has publicly announced the change in its policy framework as a response to heightened financial stability concerns after the third quarter of 2010. This study aims to look whether the CBRT's response to financial systemic stress has really changed or not after 2010 by carrying out a subsample regression analysis. The results are further crosschecked with rolling window and interaction dummy regression analysis. The empirical results collected from these econometric exercises indicate that the CBRT's monetary policy was leaning more against financial stress after mid-2010 compared to the previous period. © 2016 Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Central Bank of The Republic of Turkey. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÇAMLICA, F. (2016). Responsiveness of monetary policy to financial stress in Turkey. Central Bank Review, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 4, 143–150. https://ajindex.com/articles/144833

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. Bauducco, S., Bulír, A., Cih ak, ve M., 2008. Taylor Rule Under Financial Instability. IMF Working Paper, 08/18. Baxa, J., Horv ath, R., Vasícek, ve B., 2011. Monetary Policy Rules and Financial Stress: Does Financial Instability Matter for Monetary Policy? Universitat de Barcelona, 11/01. Belke, A., Polleit, T., 2007. How the ECB and the US fed set interest rates. Appl. Econ. 39, 2197e2209. Binici, M., Kara, H., Ozlu, P., 2016. Faiz Koridoru Ve Banka Faizleri: Parasal Aktarim Mekanizmasina Dair Bazi Bulgular. Working Papers 1608. Research and Monetary Policy Department, Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey. Borio, C., 2009. The Financial Cycle and Macroeconomics: what Have We Learnt? Bank for International Settlements, Working Paper, No. 395. Borio, C., 2011. Central Banking Post-Crisis: what Compass for Uncharted Waters? Bank for International Settlements, Working Paper, No. 353. Brave, S., Butters, R.A., 2011a. Monitoring Financial Stability: a Financial Conditions Index Approach. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, pp. 22e43. Economic Perspectives, First Quarter. Brave, S., Butters, R.A., 2011b. Gathering Insights on the Forest from the Trees: a New Metric for Financial Conditions, Mimeo, May. Bulír, A., Cih ak, M., 2008. Central Bankers' Dilemma when Banks Are Fragile: to Tighten or Not to Tighten? IMF (Working Paper). Camlica, F., Gunes, D., 2016. Türkiye’de Finansal Stresin Olçülmesi: Y € ontemsel Bir € Kars¸ ılas¸ tırma. Research Notes in Economics, No. 6. Central Bank of Turkey. Cardarelli, R., Elekdag, S., Lall, S., 2011. Financial stress and economic contractions. J. Financial Stab. 7 (2), 78e97. Castro, V., 2007. Are Central Banks Following a Linear or Nonlinear (Augmented) Taylor Rule? (Warwick Economic Papers). Clarida, R., Gali, Jordi, Gertler, Mark, 1998. Monetary policy rules in practice Some international evidence. Eur. Econ. Rev. Elsevier 42 (6), 1033e1067. Hakkio, C., Keaton, W., 2009. Financial Stress: what Is it, How Can it Be Measured, and Why Does it Matter? Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Economic Review. Hayashi, F., 2000. Econometrics. Princeton University Publications. Hollo, D., Kremer, M., Lo Duca, M., 2012. CISS e a Composite Indicator of Systemic Stress in the Financial System (ECB Working Paper). Kara, A.H., Bas¸ çı, E., 2011. Finansal _ Istikrar Ve Para Politikası. CBRT Working Paper, No. 11/08. Kilimci, E., Er, H., Çerçil, _I., 2014. Devlet _Iç Borçlanma Senetleri _Ikincil Piyasa Likiditesini Etkileyen Faktorler. CBRT