Dergiler / Alınteri Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2

Kurumsal Poli̇ti̇kalarla Ai̇le Yaşamını Desteklemek: Ai̇le Dostu Örgütler

Supporting Family Life Through Institutional Policies: Family-friendly Organizations

Selvi Vural(GÜMÜŞHANE ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-3245-8599
Sayfa
89–110
Yayın Tarihi
2026-06-30
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Sonuç olarak mevcut çalışma, aile dostu örgüt kültürünün stratejik bir öncelik haline getirilmesi ve bu yönlü politikaların kapsayıcı bir yaklaşımla yaygınlaştırılması gerekliliğine ve önemine dikkat çekmektedir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu araştırma, aile dostu örgütlerin kurumsal politikalar aracılığıyla çalışanların iş ve aile yaşamlarını dengeleme sürecinde oynadığı rolü ele almaktadır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Mevcut araştırma sosyal değişim teorisi, örgütsel destek algısı, çalışan refahı teorileri ve stratejik insan kaynakları yönetimi gibi kuramsal temellere dayanarak bu politikaların çalışan memnuniyeti, bağlılık, performans ve örgütsel meşruiyet üzerindeki etkilerini açıklamaktadır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Sonuç olarak mevcut çalışma, aile dostu örgüt kültürünün stratejik bir öncelik haline getirilmesi ve bu yönlü politikaların kapsayıcı bir yaklaşımla yaygınlaştırılması gerekliliğine ve önemine dikkat çekmektedir.
🔬Tür:Laboratuvar & Saha Deneyi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:İş-aile Dengesi · Kurumsal Politikalar · Aile Dostu Örgütler

Özet

Bu araştırma, aile dostu örgütlerin kurumsal politikalar aracılığıyla çalışanların iş ve aile yaşamlarını dengeleme sürecinde oynadığı rolü ele almaktadır. Modern iş yaşamında bireylerin hem profesyonel hem de ailevi yükümlülüklerini eşzamanlı olarak sürdürebilmeleri, sadece bireysel refah açısından değil, esasında örgütsel performans ve sürdürülebilirlik açısından da kritik bir önem taşımaktadır. Bu çerçevede aile dostu politikalar; esnek çalışma saatleri, doğum ve babalık izinleri, çocuk bakım destekleri, uzaktan çalışma veya psikolojik danışmanlık gibi uygulamaları kapsamakta ve çalışanların yaşam kalitesini artırarak iş-aile dengesini desteklemektedir. Mevcut araştırma sosyal değişim teorisi, örgütsel destek algısı, çalışan refahı teorileri ve stratejik insan kaynakları yönetimi gibi kuramsal temellere dayanarak bu politikaların çalışan memnuniyeti, bağlılık, performans ve örgütsel meşruiyet üzerindeki etkilerini açıklamaktadır. Türkiye örneği üzerinden yapılan değerlendirmede ise yasal düzenlemelere rağmen uygulamada çeşitli sınırlılıkların bulunduğu ve kamu-özel sektör arasında farklılıkların devam ettiği vurgulanmaktadır. Sonuç olarak mevcut çalışma, aile dostu örgüt kültürünün stratejik bir öncelik haline getirilmesi ve bu yönlü politikaların kapsayıcı bir yaklaşımla yaygınlaştırılması gerekliliğine ve önemine dikkat çekmektedir.

Abstract

This research examines the role that family-friendly organizations play in helping employees balance their work and family lives through corporate policies. In modern business life, individuals' ability to simultaneously fulfill both professional and family responsibilities is critical not only for individual well-being but also for organizational performance and sustainability. Within this framework, family-friendly policies encompass practices such as flexible working hours, maternity and paternity leave, childcare support, remote work, and psychological counseling, enhancing employees' quality of life and supporting work-family balance. Drawing on theoretical foundations such as social exchange theory, perception of organizational support, employee well-being theories, and strategic human resources management, the study explains the impact of these policies on employee satisfaction, commitment, performance, and organizational legitimacy. The evaluation, conducted using the Turkish example, highlights the continuing limitations in implementation despite legal regulations and the continuing disparities between the public and private sectors. Consequently, the current study highlights the necessity and importance of making family-friendly organizational culture a strategic priority and disseminating these policies with an inclusive approach.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Vural, S. (2026). Kurumsal Poli̇ti̇kalarla Ai̇le Yaşamını Desteklemek: Ai̇le Dostu Örgütler. Alınteri Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2, 89–110. https://doi.org/10.30913/alinterisosbil.1884133

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (100)

  1. Yayımlanmış Eserler
  2. Afzal, S., & Abdul Ghani Azmi, I. (2022). Effect of family-friendly practices on employees’ intention to quit: The mediating role of organizational citizenship behavior. International Journal of Management Studies, 29(1), 37-82. https://doi.org/10.32890/ijms2022.29.1.2
  3. Akgül, İ. (2024). Kadın istihdamının iş ve aile yaşam uyumuna etkileri. Hakkâri Review, 8(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.31457/hr.1575923
  4. Alexander, J. D., Harris, C., & Durocher, S. (2024). Purpose: A potential catalyst and anchor for optimal work-family balance and well‐being. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 16(4), 695-714. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12595
  5. Altunok, B. (2024). Türkiye’de iş-yaşam dengesini sağlamaya yönelik “izin politikalarının” “iş kanunu” ve “devlet memurları kanunu” perspektifinde incelenmesi. Siirt Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 12(1), 31-44. https://doi.org/10.53586/susbid.1383594
  6. Andrade, M., & Chen, W. T. (2025). Family supportive supervisor behaviors: Employee insights. American Journal of Management, 25(2), 7-21.
  7. Arslan, A. (2023). Characteristics, types and functions of family concept. African Educational Research Journal, 11(1), 45-48. https://doi.org/10.30918/AERJ.111.23.001
  8. Ashraf, B., & Ashraf, R. (2024). Factors influencing absenteeism among nurses of a tertiary care hospital of Lahore. Annals of Human and Social Sciences, 5(1), 319-325. https://doi.org/10.35484/ahss.2024(5-I)29
  9. Aydın, G. G., & Ünnü, N. A. (2020). Örgütsel aile desteği, iş-aile çatışması ve işle bütünleşme arasındaki ilişkileri belirlemeye yönelik bir araştırma. Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (48), 9-53.
  10. Ayta, F., & Şen, M. (2023). Türkiye’de kadın istihdamının genel görünümü: İstihdamın artırılması kapsamında seçilmiş ülke örnekleri. Uluslararası Ekonomi ve Yenilik Dergisi, 9(2), 421-454. https://doi.org/10.20979/ueyd.1327737
  11. Bende, A. P., & Fejes-Nádai, J. (2025). Sustainability related values in family-friendly organizations. Journal of Community Positive Practices, (1), 34-43. https://doi.org/10.35782/JCPP.2025.1.02
  12. Blau, P. M. (1964). Justice in social exchange. Sociological Inquiry, 34(2), 193-206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1964.tb00583.x
  13. Boros, K., Csordás, T., & Markos-Kujbus, É. (2025). Family-friendly business events-an impossible ménage? International Journal of Event and Festival Management, 16(4), 473-491. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEFM-09-2024-0117
  14. Bourhis, A., & Mekkaoui, R. (2010). Beyond work-family balance: Are family-friendly organizations more attractive? Relations Industrielles, 65(1), 98-117. https://doi.org/10.7202/039529ar
  15. Brewster, C., & Brookes, M. (2024). Sustainable development goals and new approaches to HRM: Why HRM specialists will not reach the sustainable development goals and why it matters. German Journal of Human Resource Management, 38(2), 183-201. https://doi.org/10.1177/23970022241229037
  16. Brzykcy, A. Z., Rönkkö, M., Boehm, S. A., & Goetz, T. M. (2024). Work-family conflict and strain: Revisiting theory, direction of causality, and longitudinal dynamism. Journal of Applied Psychology, 109(12), 1-70. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001204
  17. Bursal, M., & Şentürk, İ. (2023a). Determinants of gender discrimination in working hours: The Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition method. Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi Sosyal Ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 25(45), 1014-1034.
  18. Bursal, M., & Şentürk, İ. (2023b). Çalışma hayatında ev eksenli çalışanların sosyo-demografik bulgular işığında değerlendirilmesi. İçinde M. Bursal (Ed.), Geçmişten günümüze çalışma hayatı, yaşanan değişimler ve sorunlar (s. 53). Efe Akademi Yayınları.
  19. Bursal, M., & Şentürk, İ. (2024). Türkiye’de hane halkı aile yapısının kadınların çalışma süresi üzerindeki etkisi. Akademik İncelemeler Dergisi, 19(2), 244-257. https://doi.org/10.17550/akademikincelemeler.1321328
  20. Chang, Y., Cobb, H. R., Kepes, S., Her, D. Y., Zhou, Y., & Matthews, R. A. (2025). A cross-disciplinary bibliometric review of family-friendly work activities and agenda for future research. Group & Organization Management, 50(2), 574-631. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011251320421
  21. Changlong, W., Amri, H. F. H., & Soh, M. C. (2025). Intergenerational dynamics of Chinese heritage sports in rural governance: Cultural transmission and social cohesion. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 10(2), e003012. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v10i2.3012
  22. Chikwe, C. F., Dagunduro, A. O., Ajuwon, O. A., & Kuteesa, K. N. (2024). Organizational development and gender inclusivity: A framework for sustainable change. International Journal of Engineering Inventions, 13(9), 284-291.
  23. Choi, H. M. (2024). Stress at the crossroads: Work-family conflict and work withdrawal behavior. Sustainability, 16(16), 6975. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16166975
  24. Cholden-Brown, L. (2025). Social reproduction through workplace flexibility. Employee Rights and Employment Policy Journal, 28, 82-96.
  25. Chun, J. (2025). Utilization of family-friendly policies, parental burnout, and work-family balance satisfaction among employed mothers with children. Human Ecology Research, 63(1), 57-74. http://doi.org/10.6115/her.2025.005
  26. Chun, Y. J. (2021). Public system for family counselling service in South Korea. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 42(4), 390-401. https://doi.org/10.1002/anzf.1470
  27. Costa, R. (2025). Building a strong organizational culture: Key drivers and best practices. OTS Canadian Journal, 4(6), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.58840/dyqem182
  28. Çevik, İ. (2025). Tarihi seyrinde değişen aile ve postmodern babalık. Türkiye Din Eğitimi Araştırmaları Dergisi, (19), 185-216. https://doi.org/10.53112/tudear.1658071
  29. Çolak, A. (2022). Kadının işgücüne katılımı ve İskandinav aile dostu refah politikaları; İzin uygulamaları ve Türkiye. Balkan & Near Eastern Journal of Social Sciences, 8(Special Issue), 187-202.
  30. de Laat, K., Doucet, A., & Gerhardt, A. (2023). More than employment policies? Parental leaves, flexible work and fathers’ participation in unpaid care work. Community, Work & Family, 26(5), 562-584. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2023.2271646
  31. Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500-507. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500
  32. Ferdous, T., Ali, M., & French, E. (2023). Use of flexible work practices and employee outcomes: The role of work-life balance and employee age. Journal of Management & Organization, 29(5), 833-853. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2020.44
  33. Ganiyeva, F. (2022). The role of the family as a social institution in the formation of society in modern times. Vakanüvis-Uluslararası Tarih Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(Special Issue), 1566-1581.
  34. Gao, J., Zhang, Y., Xu, S., & Ma, E. (2025). Rethinking work-life integration: Empowering talent in emerging hospitality and tourism work paradigms. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 37(5), 1765-1783. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-05-2024-0736
  35. Gao, M. G., & Ruan, H. (2022). Work-family policies and gender inequalities in childcare time. Socius, 8, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231221142677
  36. Garlatti Costa, G., Aleksić, D., & Bortoluzzi, G. (2022). The power of balance: Interplay effects of exploitative leadership style, work-family balance and family-friendly workplace practices on innovation implementation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 25(5), 1266-1287. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-12-2020-0488
  37. Gašić, D., & Berber, N. (2023). The mediating role of employee engagement in the relationship between flexible work arrangements and turnover intentions among highly educated employees in the Republic of Serbia. Behavioral Sciences, 13(2), 131. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13020131
  38. Gerçek, M. (2025). Balancing demands and resources along the work-family continuum of working mothers: Insights from a meta-synthesis study. Journal of Family Issues, 46(5), 827-858. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X241299418
  39. Greenhaus, J., & Beutell, N. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10(1), 76-88. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1985.4277352
  40. Grotto, A. R., & Andreassi, J. K. (2025). When it’s better than expected: A quasi-experimental study of firm-provided paid parental leave and employee organizational commitment. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 36(1), 80-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2024.2439269
  41. Handelzalts, J. E., Kalfon-Hakhmigari, M., & Garthus-Niegel, S. (2024). Work-family conflict: Emphasis on families in modern work environments. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 42(2), 139-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2024.2303870
  42. Harrop, N., Jiang, L., & Overall, N. (2026). A meta‐analysis of antecedents and outcomes of flexible working arrangements. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 47(2), 208-236. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2896
  43. Hasanah, U., & Bagis, F. (2024). Causes of high turnover intention: Due to work-family conflict and work environment factors. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, 18(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n1-116
  44. Heikkinen, S., Lämsä, A. M., & Niemistö, C. (2021). Work-family practices and complexity of their usage: A discourse analysis towards socially responsible human resource management. Journal of Business Ethics, 171(4), 815-831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04458-9
  45. Heikkinen, S., Peltoperä, K., & Kokko, A. (2024). Are family-friendly organisations friendly for children? Navigating work, families with children, and discursive power use within organisations. Community, Work & Family, 29(1), 123-147. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2024.2349047
  46. Hejase, H. J., El Dirani, A., Haidar, Z., Alawieh, L., Ahmad, A. A., & Sfeir, N. (2024). The impact of employee well-being on organizational effectiveness: Context of Lebanon. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 14(2), 15-54. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijhrs.v14i2.22142
  47. Herrera-Ballesteros, J., de las Heras-Rosas, C. J., Mota Veiga, P., & Sampaio Rodrigues, F. (2025). How do flexible working time policies, telework from home and work fatigue impact on the work-life balance? International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 33(12), 153-173. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-09-2024-4797
  48. Hsiao, H. (2023). A cross-national study of family-friendly policies, gender egalitarianism, and work-family conflict among working parents. PLOS ONE, 18(9), e0291127. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291127
  49. Islam, M. S., & Amin, M. (2022). A systematic review of human capital and employee well-being: Putting human capital back on the track. European Journal of Training and Development, 46(5-6), 504-534. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-12-2020-0177
  50. Jang, H., & Ahn, H. (2021). Organizational responses to work-life balance issues: The adoption and use of family-friendly policies in Korean organizations. International Review of Public Administration, 26(3), 238-253. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2021.1916143
  51. Junça Silva, A. (2025). Being healthy and achieving life harmony: The role of hybrid work and the mediating effect of work-family [with pets] conflict. Journal of Management Development, 44(2), 219-241. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-04-2024-0144
  52. Kang, X., Bui, T. M. C., Singh, S., & Fertig, M. (2025). From survival to shift: Value creation by cross-sector partnerships under authoritarianism. Business Strategy & Development, 8(3), e70152. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.70152
  53. Kashive, C., & Roy, D. (2025). Exploring the benefits and challenges of flexible work policies on women’s job satisfaction. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 14(2), 177-186. https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2025.14.2.0317
  54. Kim, S., Lee, Y., & Park, N. (2025). Substantive representation for and by women: Female-support and family-friendly bills in South Korea. Asian Journal of Political Science, 33(3), 506-528. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2025.2480583
  55. Ko, M. C. (2024). The structural relationship of family-friendly policies, work-life balance, and employee subjective well-being: Focusing on the categorization of family-friendly policies based on the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 44(2), 377-409. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X221136431
  56. Koçak, S., & Demir, B. (2023). Türkiye’de aile politikalarının sürdürülebilir kalkınma ve sosyal hizmetler açısından değerlendirilmesi. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, (85), 65-77. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2023.85.1299286
  57. Kossek, E. E., Perrigino, M. B., & Lautsch, B. A. (2023). Work-life flexibility policies from a boundary control and implementation perspective: A review and research framework. Journal of Management, 49(6), 2062-2108. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063221140354
  58. Kossek, E. E., Vaziri, H., Perrigino, M. B., Lautsch, B. A., Pratt, B. R., & King, E. B. (2025). Reenvisioning family-supportive organizations through a diversity, equity, and inclusion perspective: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 51(6), 2520-2548. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063241310149
  59. Kröll, C., Nüesch, S., & Foege, J. N. (2021). Flexible work practices and organizational attractiveness in Germany: The mediating role of anticipated organizational support. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(3), 543-572. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2018.1479876
  60. Kulik, L. (2024). Stressors in the family-work system, family‐friendly management practice assessment and dedication to work: A comparative analysis between fathers and mothers. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 24(3), 1309-1337. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12401
  61. Kumar, P., Kumar, N., Aggarwal, P., & Yeap, J. A. (2021). Working in lockdown: The relationship between COVID-19 induced work stressors, job performance, distress, and life satisfaction. Current Psychology, 40(12), 6308-6323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01567-0
  62. Kundi, Y. M., Hamid, Z., Ghani, B., & Kaiser, U. (2025). From family to fortune: The dual impact of family-friendly policies and ethical work climate on employee career success. Career Development International, 30(3), 272-288. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-04-2024-0147
  63. Li, Y., Pan, S. Y., & Liu, C. Y. (2025). Examining the comparative effects of family-friendly work culture and inclusive nonwork-supportive culture on organizational attractiveness for single employees. Current Psychology, 44(11), 10183-10202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-025-07841-9
  64. Li, Z. D., & Zhang, B. (2023). Family-friendly policy evolution: A bibliometric study. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10, 303. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01784-x
  65. Lukito, D., Susanti, M., Susanto, Y., Judijanto, L., Ali, M., & Mahardhani, A. J. (2025). Determinants of sustainable employee performance: A study of family businesses in Indonesia. Asia Pacific Management Review, 30(2), 100340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2024.12.004
  66. Lyu, X. (2025). Research on the micro-mechanism of family-friendly policy on work-family balance: The role of policy empowerment and attribution. Work, 80(3), 1029-1039. https://doi.org/10.1177/10519815241290290
  67. Maharani, R., & Haeba Ramli, A. (2024). The roles of family-supportive supervisor behaviour, work-life balance, job satisfaction, motivation, and job performance among married private employees. Journal of HRM, 27(1), 39-54. https://doi.org/10.46287/PKYK4429
  68. Maheshwari, B., Pandey, J., & Billore, A. (2022). Paternity leave: Stepchild of family-friendly policies moderating role of traditional masculinity ideology. Personnel Review, 51(7), 1772-1787. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-07-2020-0519
  69. Maheshwari, M., & Lenka, U. (2022). Family friendly policies: A double-edged sword? Industrial and Commercial Training, 54(2), 293-316. https://doi.org/10.1108/ICT-05-2021-0034
  70. Makowski, M. (2025). Determinants of employee well-being. İçinde M. Adamska-Chudzińska & J. Pawlak (Eds.), Work engagement and employee well-being (ss. 30-48). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032715407
  71. Mayson, S., & Bardoel, A. (2021). Sustaining a career in general practice: Embodied work, inequality regimes, and turnover intentions of women working in general practice. Gender, Work & Organization, 28(3), 1133-1151. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12659
  72. Meacham, H., Holland, P., Pariona-Cabrera, P., Kang, H., Tham, T. L., Bartram, T., & Cavanagh, J. (2025). The role of family support on the effects of paramedic role overload on resilience, intention to leave and promotive voice. Personnel Review, 54(1), 236-255. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-08-2023-0685
  73. Min, J., & Kim, G. (2024). Breaking gender stereotypes in management practices: Promoting paternity leave. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(5), 3823-3835. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2776
  74. Ng, P. M., Lit, K. K., & Cheung, C. T. (2022). Remote work as a new normal? The technology-organization-environment (TOE) context. Technology in Society, 70, 102022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102022
  75. Ngo, H. Y., Foley, S., & Loi, R. (2009). Family friendly work practices, organizational climate, and firm performance: A study of multinational corporations in Hong Kong. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(5), 665-680. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.606
  76. Ni, X., & Klammer, U. (2025). A study of the concept and practice of German “family-friendly companies” and some insights for China. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, 982. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05160-9
  77. Obermayer, N., Kővári, E., Leinonen, J., Bak, G., & Valeri, M. (2022). How social media practices shape family business performance: The wine industry case study. European Management Journal, 40(3), 360-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2021.08.003
  78. Osimen, G. U., Rachel, A. A., Nwobodo, H., & Alawode, O. (2025). Assessing the impact of maternity leave policy on organisational performance in Covenant University, Nigeria. Journal of Posthumanism, 5(1), 492-501.
  79. Özcan, H. A. (2024). Esnek çalışma modeli olan uzaktan çalışmada sosyal güvenlik hakkı. Van İnsani ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7, 130-153. https://doi.org/10.62068/visbid.1461022
  80. Petitta, L., & Ghezzi, V. (2025). Remote work and psychological distance: Organizational belongingness as a resource against work stressors and employee performance impairment and distress. Sustainability, 17(4), 1342. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17041342
  81. Prentice, C., Dominique-Ferreira, S., Wang, X., Tuominen, J., Duarte, M., & Rocha, H. (2025). Work-life imbalance, burning out, feeling down, I will quit, but quietly-the case of hospitality employees. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 34(1), 24-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2024.2389074
  82. Saari, Z., Akir, H. F. M., Ishak, I., Hassim, N., Abdullah, B. A., Abidin, A. F. Z., & Eun, K. S. (2024). Building resilience: A SWOT and TOWS analysis of LPPKN's role in enhancing population quality and family well-being in Malaysia. Journal of Health and Quality of Life, 2(1), 12-22. https://doi.org/10.37934/jhqol.2.1.1222a
  83. Sağlam, Ö. (2025). Değişen kimlikler çağında aile dostu istihdam politikaları ve post modern ebeveynlik. Sosyal Politika Çalışmaları Dergisi, 2025(Aile Özel Sayısı Cilt-1), 71-98. https://doi.org/10.21560/spcd.vi.1625204
  84. Samsudin, A., Ikaningtiyas, M., Mulia, F., & Rintalla, M. (2024). Exploring the relationship between career advancement, work-life balance, and corporate financial performance: A systematic review. Atestasi: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 7(2), 1091-1110. https://doi.org/10.57178/atestasi.v7i2.918
  85. Shirmohammadi, M., Au, W. C., & Beigi, M. (2022). Remote work and work-life balance: Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic and suggestions for HRD practitioners. Human Resource Development International, 25(2), 163-181. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2022.2047380
  86. Shivhare, A. (2025). Beyond diversity: An analysis of gender inclusion within Indian manufacturing organizations. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 33(4), 763-779. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-01-2024-4165
  87. Soyseçkin, İ. S. (2016). Balance between work and family life: Middle class working mothers in Turkey. Fe Dergi, 8(1), 130-143. https://doi.org/10.1501/Fe0001_0000000157
  88. Stych, M. (2021). The definition of family in international and EU law. Mest Journal, 9(1), 192-198. https://doi.org/10.12709/mest.09.09.01.22
  89. Swody, C. A., & Powell, G. N. (2007). Determinants of employee participation in organizations’ family-friendly programs: A multi-level approach. Journal of Business and Psychology, 22(2), 111-122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-007-9057-6
  90. Syed, S., Memon, S. B., & Shah, A. Q. (2025). Want to balance my work-family life today: Work-family balance practices in Pakistan. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 41(1), 399-413. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEAS-10-2021-0207
  91. Topgül, S. (2017). Aile dostu politikalar ve iş yaşamının uyumlaştırılması çerçevesinde uygulamaların değerlendirilmesi. Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, 12(1), 45-66. https://doi.org/10.19129/sbad.3120
  92. Tosun, C., & Keskin, F. (2017). Çalışan-dostu kurumlarda iş-yaşam dengesi politikaları, kurumsal iletişim ve verimlilik. Verimlilik Dergisi, 4, 7-27.
  93. Vyas, L. (2025). Experiences of working women in India under family-friendly policies: Straight from the horse’s mouth. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 18(1), 77-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2023.2191802
  94. Vyas, L., Cheung, F., Ngo, H. Y., & Chou, K. L. (2022). Family-friendly policies: Extrapolating a pathway towards better work attitudes and work behaviors in Hong Kong. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(19), 12575. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912575
  95. Wang, Y. (2024). Work-family conflict and balance strategies—An analysis based on the work-family resources model. Open Journal of Business and Management, 12(2), 1228-1239. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojbm.2024.122064
  96. Yadav, V., & Sharma, H. (2023). Family-friendly policies, supervisor support and job satisfaction: Mediating effect of work-family conflict. Vilakshan-XIMB Journal of Management, 20(1), 98-113. https://doi.org/10.1108/XJM-02-2021-0050
  97. Yaman, M. (2025). Neoliberal politikalar ekseninde aile politikası: Toplumsal yeniden üretim yaklaşımı çerçevesinden bir değerlendirme. Eğitim Bilim Toplum, 22(87), 3-28.
  98. Yıldız, S. (2025). Çalışma sürelerinde esnekleşme: Kayan iş süreleri ve iklim değişikliğine uyum üzerine değerlendirmeler. Ankara Sosyal Bilimler Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(2), 2509-2556. https://doi.org/10.47136/asbuhfd.1557776
  99. Yuwono, A., & Agustiono, A. (2025). Relationship between family influence, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment of non-family employees: HR practices as a mediating variable. Journal of Applied Management Research, 5(1), 20-31. https://doi.org/10.36441/jamr.v5i1.2946
  100. Zhang, Y. (2022). Balancing work and family? Young mother’s coordination points in contemporary China. Contemporary Social Science, 17(4), 326-339. https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2022.2086998