Dergiler / Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 66 - Sayı: 1

THE PROBLEM OF JUS COGENS FROM A THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE

Teorik Perspektiften Jus Cogens Sorunu

Sayfa
73–115
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Since the article provides an identification test for jus cogens norms solely on formal basis, once these procedural and formal requirements are enlightened it needs to be conceded that any norm fulfilling these criteria, regardless of its content, is jus cogens as no material requirement in relation to jus cogens norms exists.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:With the concept of jus cogens a new and independent source of international law is introduced.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Jus cogens norms owe their validity to a norm of c ustomary international law which is reflected by Article 53 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Since the article provides an identification test for jus cogens norms solely on formal basis, once these procedural and formal requirements are enlightened it needs to be conceded that any norm fulfilling these criteria, regardless of its content, is jus cogens as no material requirement in relation to jus cogens norms exists.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

With the concept of jus cogens a new and independent source of international law is introduced. Jus cogens norms owe their validity to a norm of c ustomary international law which is reflected by Article 53 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. The detailed analysis of this article reveals that jus cogens norms are hierarchically located between customary international law and international treaties. Although jus cogens norms are hierarchically inferior to customary international law, a primacy of application is granted to jus cogens norms over any customary rule. The concept of jus cogens is afflicted with many formal and material ambiguities. However, the difficulty of determining which obligations constitute jus cogens mainly stems from the fact that the procedure envisaged by Article 53 for the creation of jus cogens norms is ambiguous. Since the article provides an identification test for jus cogens norms solely on formal basis, once these procedural and formal requirements are enlightened it needs to be conceded that any norm fulfilling these criteria, regardless of its content, is jus cogens as no material requirement in relation to jus cogens norms exists.

Abstract

Jus cogens kavramıyla birlikte uluslararası hukukta yeni ve bağımsız bir kaynak ortaya çıkmıştır. Jus cogens normlar geçerliliklerini Viyana Antlaşmalar Hukuku Sözleşmesi'nin 53. maddesinde yansımasını bulan bir uluslararası örf ve âdet hukuku normuna borçludur. Bu maddenin detaylı analizi, jus cogens normların hiyerarşik olarak uluslararası örf ve âdet hukuku ile uluslararası antlaşmalar arasında yer aldığını göstermektedir. Jus cogens normlar hiyerarşik olarak uluslararası örf ve âdet hukukunun altında yer alsa da, uluslararası teamül kuralları önünde bir uygulama önceliğine sahiptirler. Jus cogens kavramı pek çok şeklî ve maddî belirsizliklerden mustariptir. Ancak, hangi yükümlülüklerin jus cogens teşkil ettiğini belirlemekteki güçlük temel olarak 53. madde tarafından öngörülen jus cogens normların yaratılması sürecinin belirsizliğinden kaynaklanmaktadır. Madde jus cogens normları için şeklî kriterlerden oluşan bir tanılama testi sağladığı için, prosedürel ve şeklî gereklilikler aydınlatıldığında, bu kriterlere uyan bütün normların içeriklerinden bağımsız olarak jus cogens olduğunu kabul etmek gerekecektir.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GÜLGEÇ, Y. B. (2017). THE PROBLEM OF JUS COGENS FROM A THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE. Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 66 - Sayı: 1, 73–115. https://ajindex.com/articles/144634

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (20)

  1. Anrade, Gustavo Fernandes de (2001), "Comparative Constitutional Law: Judicial Review", Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 977- 989. Aust, Anthony (2010), Handbook of International Law¸ 2nd Edition,
  2. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  3. Austin, John (2001), The Province of Jurisprudence Determined (ed. Wilfrid E. Rumble), 2nd Edition,
  4. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  5. Barnett, Hilaire (2002), Constitutional and Administrative Law, 4th Edition,
  6. London, Cavendish. Bassiouni, M. Cherif (1996), "International Crimes: 'Jus Cogens' and 'Obligatio Erga Omnes'", Law and Contemporary Problems, Vol. 59, No. 4, pp. 63-74.
  7. Cassese, Antonio (2005), International Law, 2nd Edition,
  8. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  9. Christenson, Gordon A. (1987), "The World Court and Jus Cogens", The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 81, No. 1, pp. 93-101.
  10. Crawford, James (2012), Brownlie's Principles of Public International Law, 8th Edition,
  11. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  12. Currie, John H. (2008), Public International Law, 4th Edition,
  13. Toronto, Irwin Law. Czapliński, Wladyslav (2006), "Ius Cogens and the Law of Treaties", in The Fundamental Rules of the International Legal Order: Jus Cogens and Obligations Erga Omnes (eds. Christian Tomuschat and Jean-Marc Thouvenin), Leiden, Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 83-98.
  14. D'Amato, Anthony (1962), "Treaties As a Source of General Rules of International Law", Northwestern University School of Law Faculty Working Papers, No. 120, http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/facultyworkingpapers/1 20, Date of Access: 22 August 2016.
  15. Danilenko, Gennady M. (1991), "International Jus Cogens: Issues of Law- Making", European Journal of International Law, Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 42- 65. Denk, Erdem (2001), "Uluslararası Antlaşmalar Hukukunda Jus Cogens Kurallar", Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, Vol. 56, No. 2, pp. 44-70.
  16. Dixon, Martin (2013), Textbook on International Law, 7th Edition,
  17. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  18. Elias, Olufemi (1991), "Some Remarks on the Persistent Objector Rule in Customary International Law", The Denning Law Journal, Vol. 6, pp. 37- 51. Fuller, Lon L. (1958), "Positivism and Fidelity to Law: A Reply to Professor Hart", Harvard Law Review, Vol. 71, No. 4, pp. 630-672.
  19. Gardiner, Richard K. (2003),
  20. International Law, Essex, Pearson. Goldsmith, Jack L. and Posner, Eric A., "A Theory of Customary International Law", Chicago University John M. Olin Law & Economics Working Paper No. 63, http://ww