Dergiler / Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics / 2018 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3

Re-examination of steel frame office buildings in preventing collapse when subject to intense fires

Sayfa
82–88
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

These results should provide some com-fort to code writers that their requirements should indeed prevent the most cata-strophic of failures due to fires.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The purpose of the paper is to investigate the extent to which present-day design of steel framed buildings is susceptible to total collapse when subjected to extreme fire events.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:We select a 50 storey structure in which 2 and 4 adjacent storeys located at different above-ground heights are, in separate scenarios engulfed in raging fires.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:These results should provide some com-fort to code writers that their requirements should indeed prevent the most cata-strophic of failures due to fires.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

The purpose of the paper is to investigate the extent to which present-day design of steel framed buildings is susceptible to total collapse when subjected to extreme fire events. We select a 50 storey structure in which 2 and 4 adjacent storeys located at different above-ground heights are, in separate scenarios engulfed in raging fires. A total of 8 scenarios are analyzed, employing Newtonian mechanics and realistic en-ergy dissipating properties of H-shaped columns and normal concrete floor slabs possessing secondary (shrinkage and temperature) reinforcement alone. While the present Canadian building code is the basis for our column designs, other standards provide very similar specifications. Although fire proofing is required in virtually all high rise building construction, we are excluding such materials in order to simplify the analyses, but clearly do not advocate its omission – quite the opposite in fact. As well, attributes such as floor beams, partitions and furnishings of every description, all of which would in practice participate in absorbing the kinetic energy of a crush-down upper block are excluded. Despite such a vast array of conservative assump-tions, it is shown that partial collapse may occur during crush-down, however, in no case will total collapse be the consequence. These results should provide some com-fort to code writers that their requirements should indeed prevent the most cata-strophic of failures due to fires.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KOROL, R., SİVAKUMARAN, K., HEEREMA, P. (2018). Re-examination of steel frame office buildings in preventing collapse when subject to intense fires. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3, 82–88. https://ajindex.com/articles/144388

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (7)

  1. Bazant Z, Le J-L (2011). Why the observed motion history is smooth. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 137(1), 82-84.
  2. Bazant Z, Zhou Y (2002). Why did the World Trade Center collapse? - Simple analysis. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 128(1): 2-6, Addendum, 128(3), 369-370.
  3. CISC (2016). Handbook of Steel Construction. 11th Edition, Part 6 - Properties and Dimensions, Canadian Institute of Steel Construc-tion, Markham, Ontario. CSA (2014). Design of steel structures. CSA Standard CAN/CSA S16 – 14, Canadian Standards Association, Rexdale, Ontario, Canada. FEMA 403 Report (2002). World Trade Centre building performance study: data collection, preliminary observations and recommenda-tions. Hall JR Jr. (2014). The total cost of fire in the United States - a report for the National Fire Protection Association - fact sheets, 3 pages. Korol RM, Greening F, Heerema P (2015). Performance-based fire pro-tection of office buildings: A case study based on the collapse of WTC 7. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics, 1(3), 96-105.
  4. Korol RM, Sivakumaran KS (2014). Reassessing the plastic hinge model for energy dissipation of axially loaded columns. Journal of Struc-tures, ID 795257, 7 pages. McAllister TP, Sadek F, Gross JL, Kirkpatrick SW, MacNeill RS, Bocchieri R, Zarghamee MS, Erbay OO, Sarawit AT (2013). Structural analysis of impact damage to World Trade Center buildings 1, 2 and 7. Fire Technology, 49(3), 615-642.
  5. NIST (2008). Final report on the collapse of World Trade Center Build-ing 7. National Institute of Standards. NIST (2012). Questions and Answers about the NIST WTC 7 Investiga-tion (June update). National Institute of Standards. Quintierre JG, Williams FA (2014). Comments on the NIST Investiga-tion of the World Trade Center fires. Journal of Fire Sciences, 32, 281-291.
  6. Sivakumaran KS, Korol RM, Fan X (2014). Energy absorption potential of concrete floors containing secondary (shrinkage and tempera-ture) reinforcements. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 8(3), 282-291.
  7. Wikipedia (2018). Factor of Safety. https://en.wikipe-dia.org/wiki/Factor of safety, Downloaded on 15-04-2018.