Dergiler / Central Bank Review / 2016 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 3

Informality as a stepping stone: A search-theoretical assessment of informal sector and government policy

Sayfa
109–117
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This is an openaccess article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This paper develops a model of sequential job search to understand the factors determining the effect oftax and enforcement policies on the size (i.e., employment share) of informal sector.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Calibrating the model to the Brazilian data, I perform numerical exercises conŞrming that the effect of government policy on the size ofinformal sector is a decreasing function of the intensity of skill acquisition in the informal sector.© 2016 Central Bank of The Republic of Turkey.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This is an openaccess article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:2016 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

This paper develops a model of sequential job search to understand the factors determining the effect oftax and enforcement policies on the size (i.e., employment share) of informal sector. The focus is on therole of informal sector as a stepping stone to formal jobs. I argue that the stepping-stone role of informaljobs is an important concept determining how strongly government policies affect the size of informalsector. I measure the extent of the stepping-stone role with the intensity of skill accumulation in theinformal sector. If informal jobs help workers acquire skills, gain expertise, and build professional networks for boosting the chances to switch to a formal job, then the size of informal sector is less sensitive togovernment policy. In this case, the option value of a job in informal sector will be high and a worker withan informal job will not rush to switch to a formal job when a policy encouraging formal employment is ineffect. If, on the other hand, informal sector does not provide satisfactory training opportunities, then thesize of informal sector becomes more sensitive to government policy. Calibrating the model to the Brazilian data, I perform numerical exercises conŞrming that the effect of government policy on the size ofinformal sector is a decreasing function of the intensity of skill acquisition in the informal sector.© 2016 Central Bank of The Republic of Turkey. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. This is an openaccess article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

TÜMEN, S. (2016). Informality as a stepping stone: A search-theoretical assessment of informal sector and government policy. Central Bank Review, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 3, 109–117. https://ajindex.com/articles/144379

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (3)

  1. Acemoglu, D., 2001. Good jobs versus bad jobs. J. Labor Econ. 19, 1e22. Albrecht, J.W., Navarro, L., Vroman, S., 2009. The effects of labor market policies in an economy with an informal sector. Econ. J. 119, 1105e1129. Aruoba, S.B., 2010.
  2. Informal Sector, Government Policy, and Institutions. Unpublished manuscript. University of Maryland. Boeri, T., Garibaldi, P., 2005. Shadow sorting. In: Pissarides, C., Frenkel, J. (Eds.), NBER Macroeconomics Annual. MIT Press,, Cambridge, MA. Bosch, M., Esteban-Pretel, J., 2012. Job creation and job destruction in the presence of informal markets. J. Dev. Econ. 98, 270e286. Bosch, M., Maloney, W.F., 2010. Comparative analysis of labor market dynamics using Markov processes: an application to informality. Labour Econ. 17, 621e631. Cunningham, W., Salvagno, J.B., 2011. Youth Employment Transitions in Latin America. World Bank. Policy Research Working Paper #5521. Elgin, C., 2010.
  3. Political Turnover, Taxes, and the Shadow Economy. Unpublished manuscript. Bogazici University. Esteban-Pretel, J., Nakajima, R., Ryuichi, T., 2011. Are contingent jobs dead ends or stepping stones to regular jobs? Evidence from a structural estimation. Labour Econ. 18, 513e526. Fields, G., 1975. Rural-urban migration, urban unemployment and underemployment, and job search activity in LDCs. J. Dev. Econ. 2, 165e187. Friedman, E., Johnson, S., Kaufmann, D., Zoido-Lobaton, P., 2000. Dodging the grabbing hand: the determinants of unofficial activity in 69 countries. J. Public Econ. 76, 459e493. Gunther, I., Launov, A., 2012. Informal employment in developing countries: opportunity or last resort? J. Dev. Econ. 97, 88e98. Heckman, J.J., Hotz, J.V., 1986. An investigation of the labor market earnings of Panamanian males evaluating the sources of inequality. J. Hum. Resour. 21, 507e542. Heckman, J.J., Pages, C., 2000. The Cost of Job Security Regulation: Evidence from Latin American Labor Markets. NBER Working Paper #7773. Hemmer, H., Mannel, C., 1989. On the economic analysis of the urban informal sector. World Dev. 17, 1543e1552. Ihrig, J., Moe, K.S., 2004. Lurking in the shadows: the informal sector and government policy. J. Dev. Econ. 73, 541e557. Johnson, S., Kaufmann, D., Shleifer, A., 1997. The unofficial economy in transition. Brook. Pap. Econ. Act. 28, 159e240. Johnson, S., Kaufmann, D., Zoido-Lobaton, P., 1998. Regulatory discretion and the unofficial economy. Am. Econ. Rev. Pap. Proc. 88, 387e392. Ljungqvist, L., Sargent, T.J., 2008. Two q