KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Bingöl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2020 / Sayı: 20

ADVERGAME NEDİR VE NE DEĞİLDİR? ADVERGAME’İ ANLAMAK İÇİN DAVRANIŞSAL TEORİLERİN YENİDEN ÖZETLENMESİ

WHAT IS ADVERGAMING AND WHAT IT IS NOT? RECAPPING BEHAVIOURAL THEORIES TO UNDERSTAND ADVERGAMING

Murat Aktan(Woosong University)0000-0003-3683-7796
Ahmet Koçak(BİNGÖL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-4376-4337
Sayfa
229–248
Yayın Tarihi
2020-10-23
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Bu kapsamda, sekiz adet teoriye değinen bu araştırma Advergame’in bütünsel bir şekilde anlaşılmasına katkı sunmaktadır.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Son teknolojik gelişmeler sayesinde, dijital teknolojiye dayalı alternatif reklamlar, TV, gazete reklamları gibi diğer geleneksel reklamlara kıyasla katlanarak artmaktadır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Buradan hareketle bu araştırma, Sosyal Bilişsel Teori, Sınırlı Kapasite Modeli, Detaylandırma Olabilirlik Modeli vb. temel teorilere odaklanarak, advergame uygulamalarının markalara dair düşünceleri nasıl etkilediğini incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Bu kapsamda, sekiz adet teoriye değinen bu araştırma Advergame’in bütünsel bir şekilde anlaşılmasına katkı sunmaktadır.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Pazarlama · Advergaming · Reklamlı Oyun

Özet

Son teknolojik gelişmeler sayesinde, dijital teknolojiye dayalı alternatif reklamlar, TV, gazete reklamları gibi diğer geleneksel reklamlara kıyasla katlanarak artmaktadır. Advergaming, çevrimiçi video oyunları üzerine inşa edilmiş yeni bir reklam şekli olarak ortaya çıkmıştır. Advergaming'in pazarlama ve iletişim endüstrisinde her geçen gün daha fazla kullanılmasına ve giderek büyüyen bir pazarlama platformu olmasına rağmen, pazarlama literatüründe advergaming çalışmalarını davranış teorileri kapsamında inceleyen araştırmaların yeterince olmadığı görülmektedir. Buradan hareketle bu araştırma, Sosyal Bilişsel Teori, Sınırlı Kapasite Modeli, Detaylandırma Olabilirlik Modeli vb. temel teorilere odaklanarak, advergame uygulamalarının markalara dair düşünceleri nasıl etkilediğini incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu kapsamda, sekiz adet teoriye değinen bu araştırma Advergame’in bütünsel bir şekilde anlaşılmasına katkı sunmaktadır.

Abstract

Owing to the latest technological advancements, alternative ads based on digital technology have been increasing exponentially compared to traditional ads such as TV and newspaper ads. Advergaming utilizing online video games was recently becoming popular as a new form of advertisement. Although the marketing and communication industries make more use of advergaming every day and despite being a growing marketing platform, there is a lack of research in the marketing literature that examines the underpinning behavioural theories for advergaming implications. Accordingly, this article aims to identify fundamental consumer behaviour theories such as Social Cognitive Theory, Limited Capacity Model, Elaboration Likelihood Model etc. to understand whether advergames can positively influence players toward a particular brand. This study suggests that eight major theories from the consumer behaviour field are relevant to elaborate players' behaviour in advergames as well as providing a holistic understanding of this new media.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Aktan, M., Koçak, A. (2020). ADVERGAME NEDİR VE NE DEĞİLDİR? ADVERGAME’İ ANLAMAK İÇİN DAVRANIŞSAL TEORİLERİN YENİDEN ÖZETLENMESİ. Bingöl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Sayı: 20, 229–248. https://doi.org/10.29029/busbed.738050

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (55)

  1. AD FORUM (April 2008). Milk - "Get the Glass Game". https://www.adforum.com/creative-work/ad/player/12652418/get-the-glass-game/milk
  2. AKTAN, M. & Chao, P.W. (2016). Impact of Country Personality on Attitude Toward Foreign Products: Self-congruity as a Mediator. Atlantic Marketing Journal, 5(1), 155-171.
  3. AN, S. & Stern, S. (2011). Mitigating the effects of advergames on children. Journal of Advertising, 40(1), 43-56.
  4. ANDERSON, J. R. (1983). A spreading activation theory of memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22(3), 261–295.
  5. BANDURA, A. (1977), Social Learning Theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
  6. BREHM, S.S. & Brehm, J.W. (1981). Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control. Academic Press, New York, NY.
  7. BUCHHOLZ, L.M. & Smith, R.E. (1991). The role of consumer involvement in determining cognitive response to broadcast advertising. Journal of Advertising, 20(1), 4-17.
  8. CACIOPPO, J.T. & Petty, R.E. (1984). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Consumer Research, 11(1), 673-675.
  9. CICCHIRILLO, V. & Lin, J.S. (2011). Stop playing with your food: a comparison of for-profit and non-profit food-related advergames. Journal of Advertising Research, 51(3), 484-498.
  10. CSIKSZENTMIHALYI, M. (1988). The flow experience and its significance for human psychology. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. S. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness (pp. 15-35). New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press.
  11. CULP, J., Bell, R.A., & Cassady, D. (2010). Characteristics of food industry web sites and “advergames” targeting children. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 42(3), 197-201.
  12. DOBROW, L. (2004, January 15). How to Play Games and Influence People: Advergaming Emerges as New Ad Option. MediaPost. https://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/5723/how-to-play-games-and-influence-people-advergamin.html
  13. DUNCAN, G. (2011, August 23). The Sims Social officially launches on Facebook. Digital Trends, https://www.digitaltrends.com/gaming/the-sims-social-officially-launches-on-facebook/
  14. FRIESTAD, M. & Wright, P. (1994). The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 1-31.
  15. GOOGLE & Newzoo (2017). Why We Play [White paper]. Google Play. http://services.google.com/fh/files/misc/changethegame_white_paper.pdf
  16. GRODAL, T. (2000). Video Games and Pleasures of Control. In Zillmann, D. & Vorderer, P. (Eds.), Media Entertainment: The Psychology of Its Appeal, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, (pp.197–213).
  17. HUDSON, M.C., (2011, December 3). Red Bull Formula Face Uses Your Head as Controls. Trend Hunter. https://www.trendhunter.com/trends/red-bull-formula-face
  18. KAHNEMAN, D. (1973). Attention and Effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  19. KIM, M. (2004). The Role of Self- and Functional Congruity on Online Retail Patronage Behavior [Doctoral dissertation, University of Tennessee] https://trace.tennessee.edu/ cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3817&context=utk_graddiss
  20. KRUGMAN, H. E. (1965). The Impact of Television Advertising: Learning Without Involvement. Public Opinion Quarterly, 29 (3), 349-56. https://doi.org/10.1086/267335
  21. KUMAR, J., Herger, M., & Dam, R. F. (2018, November 20). A brief history of games. Interaction Design Foundation, https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/a-brief-history-of-games
  22. LEE, M. & Faber, R.J. (2007). Effects of product placement in on-line games on brand memory: A perspective of the limited-capacity model of attention. Journal of Advertising, 36(4), 75-90.
  23. LEWIS, B. (2006). Measuring player perceptions of advertising in online games. [Unpublished Master’s thesis]. Louisiana State University. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/cgi/ viewcontent.cgi?article=1792&context=gradschool_theses
  24. LLOYD, D.W. & Clancy, K.J. (1991). Television program involvement and advertising response: Some unsettling implications for copy research. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 8(4), 61-74.
  25. LYNLEY, M. (2011, August 25). Electronic Arts’ The Sims Social hits 4.6 million daily players a week after launch. Venture Beat. https://venturebeat.com/2011/08/25/sims-social-week-update/
  26. MALLINCKRODT, V. & Mizerski, D. (2007). The effects of playing an advergame on young children's perceptions, preferences, and requests. Journal of Advertising, 36(2), 87-100.
  27. MARKETING TÜRKİYE (2018, January 31). RTÜK reklam sürelerini hatırlattı: 1 saate en fazla 12 dakika. https://www.marketingturkiye.com.tr/haberler/rtuk-reklam-surelerini-hatirlatti-1-saate-en-fazla-12-dakika/
  28. MEHTA, K., Phillips, C., Ward, P., Coveney, J., Handsley, E., & Carter, P., (2012). Marketing foods to children through product packaging: prolific, unhealthy and misleading. Public Health Nutrition, 15(9), 1763-1770.
  29. MISRA, S. & Beatty, S.E. (1990). Celebrity spokesperson and brand congruence: An assessment of recall and affect. Journal of Business Research, 21(2), 159-173.
  30. MOORE, E.S. & Rideout, V.J., (2007). The online marketing of food to children: is it just fun and games?. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 26(2), 202-220.
  31. NICOVICH, S.G. (2005). The effect of involvement on ad judgment in a video game environment: the mediating role of presence. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 6(1), 29-39.
  32. OSGOOD, C.E. & Tannenbaum, P.H. (1955). The principle of congruity in the prediction of attitude change. Psychological Review, 62(1), 42.
  33. PEMPEK, T. A. & Calvert, S. L. (2009). Tipping the balance: Use of advergames to promote consumption of nutritious foods and beverages by low-income African American children. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 163(7), 633–637.
  34. PLINQ. (2019, October 10). 8 reasons why advergames are the best type of advertising. https://www.plinq.co/blog/8-reasons-why-advergames-are-the-best-form-of-advertising
  35. POHL, F. (August 1963). Spacewar, 1963. Galaxy Magazine. 21(6), World Editions, 4. https://archive.org/stream/Galaxy_v21n06_1963-08#page/n2/mode/1up
  36. REDONDO, I. (2012). The effectiveness of casual advergames on adolescents' brand attitudes. European Journal of Marketing, 46(11/12), 1671-1688.
  37. RODRIGUEZ-SANCHEZ, A.M., Schaufeli, W.B., Salanova, M., & Cifre, E. (2008). Flow experience among information and communication technology users. Psychological Reports, 102(1), 29-39.
  38. REPUTATION DEFENDER (2016, August 25). Advergaming and Gamification: Funny and Effective Digital Marketing Trends. Medium. https://medium.com/@ReputationDefender/advergaming-and-gamification-funny-and-effective-digital-marketing-trends-70b0a5b78617
  39. SCHAVERIEN, A. (2019, March 18). How Retailers Can Adapt to A.I. and The Future of Shopping. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/annaschaverien/2019/03/18/ey-future-of-shopping-retail-ai-artificial-intelligence/#431a2a904a15
  40. STEEL, E. (2013, June 12). Companies scramble for consumer data. Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/f0b6edc0-d342-11e2-b3ff-00144feab7de
  41. SUSI, T., Johannesson, M., & Backlund, P. (2007). Serious Games: An Overview (Technical Report HS- IKI -TR-07-001). School of Humanities and Informatics, University of Skövde. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:2416/FULLTEXT01.pdf
  42. TERLUTTER, R. & Capella, M.L. (2013). The gamification of advertising: analysis and research directions of in-game advertising, advergames, and advertising in social network games. Journal of Advertising, 42(2-3), 95-112.
  43. THE GERMANY PORTAL (2014, April 2). Industry 4.0 at Hannover Messe. https://www.deutschland.de/en/topic/business/globalization-world-trade/industry-40-at-hannover-messe
  44. TURKISH STATISTICAL INSTITUTE (2016, August 18). Household Information Technology Usage Survey 2016 [Press Release]. http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=21779
  45. VAN REIJMERSDAL, E. A., Rozendaal, E., & Buijzen, M. (2012). Effects of prominence, involvement, and persuasion knowledge on children's cognitive and affective responses to advergames. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26(1), 33-42.
  46. VASHISHT, D. (2015). Impact of nature of advergames on brand recall and brand attitude among young Indian gamers: moderating roles of game-product congruence and persuasion knowledge. Young Consumers, 16(4), 454-467.
  47. VASHISHT, D. & Royne, M.B. (2016). Advergame speed influence and brand recall: The moderating effects of brand placement strength and gamers’ persuasion knowledge. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 162-169.
  48. VASHISHT, D. & S. Pillai, S. (2017). Are you able to recall the brand? The impact of brand prominence, game involvement and persuasion knowledge in online–advergames. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 26(4), 402-414.
  49. WAIGUNY, M. K., Nelson, M.R., & Terlutter, R. (2012). Entertainment matters! The relationship between challenge and persuasiveness of an advergame for children. Journal of Marketing Communications, 18(1), 69-89.
  50. WILCOX, B., Kunkel D., Cantor, J., Dowrick, P., Linn, S., & Palmer, E. (2004). Report of the APA Task Force on Advertising and Children. American Psychological Association. https://www.apa.org/pi/families/resources/advertising-children.pdf
  51. WOTTRICH, V.M., Verlegh, P.W., & Smit, E.G. (2017). The role of customization, brand trust, and privacy concerns in advergaming. International Journal of Advertising, 36(1), 60-81.
  52. YANG, M., Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., Dinu, L., & Arpan, L. M. (2006). The effectiveness of" in-game" advertising: Comparing college students' explicit and implicit memory for brand names. Journal of Advertising, 35(4), 143-152.
  53. YEU, M., Yoon, H.S., Taylor, C.R., & Lee, D.H. (2013). Are banner advertisements in online games effective?. Journal of Advertising, 42(2-3), 241-250.
  54. YING, L., Korneliussen, T., & Grønhaug, K. (2009). The effect of ad value, ad placement, and ad execution on the perceived intrusiveness of web advertisements. International Journal of Advertising, 28(4), 623-38.
  55. YOUN, S. & Lee, M. (2004). Advergame Playing Motivations and Effectiveness: A ‘Uses and Gratifications’ Perspective. In Stafford, M. R., & Faber, R. J. (Eds.), Advertising, Promotion, and New Media, (pp.320-347).