Dergiler / Anestezi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1

Meta-Analysis: A Review Article

Meta-Analiz: Bir Derleme

Sayfa
1–8
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

However, there can be misleading if the studies included are non-similar in their research question or collect different types of outcome data.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Meta-analysis is a frequently used statistical technique which uses to combine data from several studies to evaluate the effectiveness of treatment interventions.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:By combining results from independent studies, we can both increase power of the study (over individual studies) and improve estimates of the size of the effect.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:However, there can be misleading if the studies included are non-similar in their research question or collect different types of outcome data.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Meta-analysis is a frequently used statistical technique which uses to combine data from several studies to evaluate the effectiveness of treatment interventions. By combining results from independent studies, we can both increase power of the study (over individual studies) and improve estimates of the size of the effect. The processes of conducting meta-analysis include developing a protocol, selecting articles, developing inclusion criteria, collecting data, data analysis and interpreting results. A major limitation of the meta-analysis is that only relevant studies which have retrievable data can be included for analysis. This causes concern for publication bias. It is obvious that metaanalysis is a useful scientific method that can provide important information when summarizing medical literature. However, there can be misleading if the studies included are non-similar in their research question or collect different types of outcome data.

Abstract

Meta-analiz, birçok çalışmadaki verileri birleştirmek ve tedavi müdahalelerinin etkinliğini değerlendirmek için sık kullanılan bir istatistiksel tekniktir. Bağımsız çalışmalardan elde edilen sonuçları birleştirerek hem çalışmanın gücünü artırabilir (bireysel çalışmalara göre) hem de effect size tahminlerini iyileştirebilir. Meta-analiz yürütme süreçleri arasında bir protokol geliştirmek, makaleler seçmek, dahil edilme kriterleri geliştirmek, veri toplamak, veri analizi yapmak ve sonuçları yorumlamak bulunmaktadır. Meta-analizin önemli bir limitasyonu, sadece analiz için geri alınabilir verilere sahip ilgili çalışmaların dahil edilebilmesidir. Bu durum publication(yayin) bias için endişe yaratmaktadir. Meta-analizin, tıp literatürünü özetlerken önemli bilgiler sağlayabilecek tam olarak faydalı bir bilimsel yöntem olduğu oldukça açıktır. Bununla birlikte, dahil edilen araştırmaların araştırma sorusuyla aynı olmadığı veya farklı sonuç verileri topladığı takdirde yanıltıcı olabilir.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

İNCE, İ., OZCİMEN, E., TURAN, A. (2019). Meta-Analysis: A Review Article. Anestezi Dergisi, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1, 1–8. https://ajindex.com/articles/144153

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Glasser SP. Essentials of Clinical Research. P:159-176. Springer Science, 2008; 159-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8486-7_10
  2. Greenland S, O’ Rourke K. Meta-Analysis. Modern Epidemiology, 3rd ed. Edited by Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash T. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2008; 652. Pearson K. Report on certain enteric fever inoculation statistics. Bri Med J. 1904;3:1243-6. Beecher HK. The powerful placebo. J Am Med Assoc. 1955;159:1602-6. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1955.02960340022006 “Archie Cochrane: The name behind Cochrane”. www. cochrane.org. Cochrane Collaboration. 5 December 2013. Retrieved 10 September 2014.
  3. Stewart L, Moher D, Shekelle P. Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense. Syst Rev. 2012;9:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-1-7
  4. Arthur W, Bennett W, Huffcutt AI. Conducting MetaAnalysis Using SAS. Mahwah, N.J.: Psychology Press 2001.
  5. Fazalare JA, Griesser MJ, Siston RA, Flanigan DC. The use of continuous passive motion following knee cartilage defect surgery: a systematic review. Orthopedics. 2010;33:878. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20101021-16
  6. Quatman CE, Quatman-Yates CC, Schmitt LC, Paterno MV. The clinical utility and diagnostic performance of MRI for identification and classification of knee osteochondritis dissecans. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:1036- 44. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.K.00275
  7. Mulla SM, Wang L, Khokhar R, et al. Management of Central Poststroke Pain: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. Stroke. 2015;46:2853- 60. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010259
  8. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Controlled Clinical Trials. 1996;17:1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4
  9. Dhammi IK, Haq RU. How to Write Systematic Review or Metaanalysis. Indian J Orthop. 2018;52:575-7. https://doi.org/10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_557_18
  10. Dickersin, Min, & Meinert, 1992 Hedges LV. Estimation of effect size under non-random sampling: The effects of censoring studies yielding statistically insignificant mean differences. Journal of Educational Statistics. 1984;9:61-85. https://doi.org/10.2307/1164832 Rosenthal R. The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin. 1979;86:638-41. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638 Greenwald AG. Consequences of prejudice against null hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin. 1975;82:1-19. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076157
  11. Coursol A, Wagner EE