Dergiler / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2020 / Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 2

Comparison of two methods for coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction: A finite element analysis

Sayfa
202–206
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The drilling technique may be associated with increased loading on the tendon graft and bone surface, causing further loss of reduction and consequent complications.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: This study aimed to compare two different tendon grafting techniques for coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction from the data obtained using finite element analysis.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Results: While the reference model yielded the lowest values for all the loading conditions as well as the shortest coracoclavicular distance, the DT model demonstrated the highest values for all the loading conditions and the largest coracoclavicular distance.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The drilling technique may be associated with increased loading on the tendon graft and bone surface, causing further loss of reduction and consequent complications.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: This study aimed to compare two different tendon grafting techniques for coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction from the data obtained using finite element analysis. Methods: Three different finite element models of the shoulder girdle were formulated using computerized tomography images: the reference model, coracoid loop technique (CLT), and drilling technique (DT) model. In all these models, forces were applied to the clavicle along three axes (x, y, and z) of the trapezius and sternocleidomastoid muscles. Thereafter, data regarding the loading values of the tendon grafts, loads on the coracoid base, and coracoclavicular vertical distance were measured. Results: While the reference model yielded the lowest values for all the loading conditions as well as the shortest coracoclavicular distance, the DT model demonstrated the highest values for all the loading conditions and the largest coracoclavicular distance. Conclusion: Different tendon grafting techniques may offer different loading values on both bone surface and tendon graft during coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction. The drilling technique may be associated with increased loading on the tendon graft and bone surface, causing further loss of reduction and consequent complications.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÇALIŞAL, E., UĞUR, L. (2020). Comparison of two methods for coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction: A finite element analysis. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 2, 202–206. https://ajindex.com/articles/143916

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Clavert P, Meyer A, Boyer P, Gastaud O, Barth J, Duparc F. Complication rates and types of failure after arthroscopic acute acromioclavicular dislocation fixation. Prospective multicenter study of 116 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2015
  2. [CrossRef] 2. Cave EF. Fractures and Other Injuries. Academic Medicine 1958
  3. Urist MR. The treatment of dislocations of the acromioclavicular joint. Am J Surg 1959
  4. [CrossRef] 4. Korsten K, Gunning AC, Leenen LPH. Operative or conservative treatment in patients with Rockwood type III acromioclavicular dislocation: a systematic review and update of current literature. Int Orthop 2014
  5. [CrossRef] 5. Simovitch R, Sanders B, Ozbaydar M, Lavery K, Warner JJ. Acromioclavicular joint injuries: diagnosis and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2009
  6. [CrossRef] 6. Mazzocca AD, Arciero RA, Bicos J. Evaluation and treatment of acromioclavicular joint injuries. Am J Sports Med 2007
  7. [CrossRef] 7. Carofino BC, Mazzocca AD. The anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction: surgical technique and indications. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2010
  8. [CrossRef] 8. Beitzel K, Cote MP, Apostolakos J, et al. Current concepts in the treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocations. Arthroscopy 2013
  9. [CrossRef] 9. Zhu Y, Hsueh P, Zeng B, et al. A prospective study of coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction with autogenous peroneus longus tendon for acromioclavicular joint dislocations. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2018
  10. [CrossRef] 10. Tomlinson DP, Altchek DW, Davila J, Cordasco FA. A modified technique of arthroscopically assisted AC joint reconstruction and preliminary results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008
  11. [CrossRef] 11. Milewski MD, Tompkins M, Giugale JM, Carson EW, Miller MD, Diduch DR. Complications related to anatomic reconstruction of the coracoclavicular ligaments. Am J Sports Med 2012
  12. [CrossRef] 12. Ferreira JV, Chowaniec D, Obopilwe E, Nowak MD, Arciero RA, Mazzocca AD. Biomechanical evaluation of effect of coracoid tunnel placement on load to failure of fixation during repair of acromioclavicular joint dislocations. Arthroscopy 2012
  13. [CrossRef] 13. Cook JB, Shaha JS, Rowles DJ, Bottoni CR, Shaha SH, Tokish JM. Clavicular bone tunnel malposition leads to early failures in coracoclavicular ligament reconstructions. Am J Sports Med 2013
  14. [CrossRef] 14. Shih CM, Huang KC, Pan CC, Lee CH, Su KC