Dergiler / Clinical Dentistry and Research / 2018 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 2

THE INFLUENCE OF AN ACIDIC SOFT DRINK ON THE MICROHARDNESS OF DIFFERENT RESTORATIVE MATERIALS

BİR ASİDİK İÇECEĞİN FARKLI RESTORATİF MATERYALLERİN MİKROSERTLİĞİ ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ

Sayfa
80–86
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

A detailed ultrastructural analysis is necessary to complement these results.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background and Aim: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of an acidic soft drink on the microhardness of different restorative materials.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Materials and Methods: One hundred twelve restoration samples, twenty-eight in each material group (Ketac Molar, Ketac Nano, Filtek Silorane and Filtek Z250), were prepared.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:A detailed ultrastructural analysis is necessary to complement these results.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Background and Aim: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of an acidic soft drink on the microhardness of different restorative materials. Materials and Methods: One hundred twelve restoration samples, twenty-eight in each material group (Ketac Molar, Ketac Nano, Filtek Silorane and Filtek Z250), were prepared. After the baseline microhardness measurement, four experimental procedures were applied daily as follows: Group I, samples were immersed in a cola drink (Coca-Cola) for five minutes over five cycles; Group II, a remineralization agent (Tooth Mousse-GC) was applied as an additional step to the procedure for Group I; Group III, a cola drink was applied once a day for twenty-five minutes; and Group IV, the samples were kept in artificial saliva as a control. Following the treatment procedure (1, 7 and 30 days), the microhardness was re-measured, and the data were statistically analysed (p<0.05). Results: The microhardness of Ketac Molar could not be measured after cola drink exposure due to surface deterioration. The differences in Ketac Nano in all experimental procedures were significant (p<0.05). In contrast, Filtek Silorane was a unique material that was not affected by cola drink exposure. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, the soft drink influenced the microhardness of the restorative materials tested. Additionally, the highest deleterious effect was found for conventional glass ionomer. A detailed ultrastructural analysis is necessary to complement these results.

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı bir asidik içeceğin farklı restoratif materyallerin mikrosertliği üzerine etkisini incelemekti. Gereç ve Yöntem: Her bir materyal grubunda (Ketac Molar, Ketac Nano, Filtek Silorane ve Filtek Z250) yirmi sekiz adet olmak üzere toplam yüz on iki adet örnek hazırlandı. Başlangıç mikrosertlik ölçümü sonrası aşağıda belirtilen prosedürler günlük olarak uygulandı. Grup I; örnekler beş kez beş dakika kola (Coca-Cola) içerisinde bekletildi. Grup II; Grup I’deki işleme ek olarak bir remineralizasyon ajanı (Tooth Mousse-GC) uygulandı. Grup III; günde yirmi beş dakika kola uygulandı. Grup IV; kontrol grubu örnekleri yapay tükürük içinde bekletildi. Uygulamalar sonrası (1, 7 ve 30 gün) tekrar mikrosertlik ölçümü yapıldı ve veriler istatistiksel olarak analiz edildi (p<0.05). Bulgular: Ketac Molar grubunda kola uygulaması sonrası yüzey deformasyonu nedeniyle mikrosertlik ölçümü yapılamadı. Tüm deney gruplarında Ketac Nano için farklılık anlamlı idi (p<0.05). Buna karşın kola uygulamasından etkilenmeyen tek materyal Filtek Silorane idi. Sonuç: Bu çalışmanın sınırları dahilinde, asidik içeceğin incelenen restoratif materyallerin mikrosertliğini etkilediği söylenebilir. İlaveten en yüksek hasar geleneksel cam iyonomer için saptanmıştır. Bulguların desteklenmesi için detaylı ultrastrüktürel analiz gereklidir.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÖZKAYA, Ç. A., PAMİR, T., ŞEN, B. H. (2018). THE INFLUENCE OF AN ACIDIC SOFT DRINK ON THE MICROHARDNESS OF DIFFERENT RESTORATIVE MATERIALS. Clinical Dentistry and Research, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 2, 80–86. https://ajindex.com/articles/143887

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Lussi A, Carvalho TS. Erosive tooth wear: a multifactorial condition of growing concern and increasing knowledge. Monogr Oral Sci 2014; 25: 1-15.
  2. Wan Bakar W, McIntyre J. Susceptibility of selected toothcoloured dental materials to damage by common erosive acids. Aust Dent J 2008; 53: 226-234.
  3. Erdemir U, Yildiz E, Eren MM, Ozel S. Surface hardness of different restorative materials after long-term immersion in sports and energy drinks. Dent Mater J 2012; 31: 729-736.
  4. Erdemir U, Yildiz E, Eren MM, Ozel S. Surface hardness evaluation of different composite resin materials: influence of sports and energy drinks immersion after a short-term period. J Appl Oral Sci 2013; 21: 124-131.
  5. Cheng R, Yang H, Shao MY, Hu T, Zhou XD. Dental erosion and severe tooth decay related to soft drinks: a case report and literature review. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 2009; 10: 395-399.
  6. Willershausen B, Schulz-Dobrick B. In vitro study on dental erosion provoked by various beverages using electron probe microanalysis. Eur J Med Res 2004; 9: 432-438.
  7. Maupome G, Diez-de-Bonilla J, Torres-Villasenor G, AndradeDelgado LC, Castaño VM. In vitro quantitative assessment of enamel microhardness after exposure to eroding immersion in a cola drink. Caries Res 1998; 32: 148-153.
  8. Schlueter N, Luka B. Erosive tooth wear - a review on global prevalence and on its prevalence in risk groups. Br Dent J 2018; 224: 364-370. Lussi A. Erosive Tooth Wear-A Multifactorial Condition of Growing Concern and Increasing Knowledge. In: Lussi A, editor. Dental Erosion from Diagnosis to Therapy. (Monographs in Oral Science Vol 20, Series Editor G.M. Whitford). Basel: Karger; 2006. p. 1-8.
  9. Tyas MJ, Anusavice KJ, Frencken JE, Mount G. Minimal intervention dentistry-a review. FDI Commission Project 1-97. Int Dent J 2000; 50: 1-12.
  10. Wiegand A, Buchalla W, Attin T. Review on fluoridereleasing restorative materials-fluoride release and uptake characteristics, antibacterial activity and influence on caries formation. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 343-362.
  11. Zhou SL, Zhou J, Watanabe S, Watanabe K, Wen LY, Xuan K. In vitro study of the effects of fluoride-releasing dental materials on remineralization in an enamel erosion model J Dent 2012; 40: 255-263.
  12. Barbour ME, Rees JS. The laboratory assessment of enamel erosion: A review. J Dent 2004; 32: 591-602.
  13. Eisenburger M, Addy M, Hughes JA, Shellis RP. Effect of time on the remineralization of enamel by synthetic saliva after citric acid erosion. Caries Res 2001; 35: 211-215.
  14. LippertF, Parke