KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Türkiye Biyolojik Mücadele Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1

Fitopatolojide biyolojik mücadele

Biological control in phytopathology

Hatice Özaktan(EGE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, ZİRAAT FAKÜLTESİ, BİTKİ KORUMA BÖLÜMÜ)
Yeşim Aysan(Çukurova Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Bitki Koruma Bölümü, Adana, Türkiye)
Figen Yıldız(EGE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, ZİRAAT FAKÜLTESİ, BİTKİ KORUMA BÖLÜMÜ)
Pervin Kınay(EGE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, ZİRAAT FAKÜLTESİ, BİTKİ KORUMA BÖLÜMÜ)
Sayfa
61–78
Yayın Tarihi
2016-07-13
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Antagonist mikroorganizma

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu yayında fitopatolojide biyolojik mücadelenin tarihçesi, antagonist mikroorganizmaların kullandıkları mekanizmalar ile fungal, bakteriyel ve viral kökenli bitki hastalıkları için kullanılan biyolojik pestisitler tartışılmıştır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Bu yayında fitopatolojide biyolojik mücadelenin tarihçesi, antagonist mikroorganizmaların kullandıkları mekanizmalar ile fungal, bakteriyel ve viral kökenli bitki hastalıkları için kullanılan biyolojik pestisitler tartışılmıştır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Antagonist mikroorganizma
🔬Tür:Makale
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:bakteri · virüs · fungus

Özet

Bu yayında fitopatolojide biyolojik mücadelenin tarihçesi, antagonist mikroorganizmaların kullandıkları mekanizmalar ile fungal, bakteriyel ve viral kökenli bitki hastalıkları için kullanılan biyolojik pestisitler tartışılmıştır. Antagonist mikroorganizma

Abstract

In this paper, history of biological control in phytopathology, biocontrol mechanisms of antagonist microorganisms, biopesticides for fungal, bacterial and viral plant diseases are discussed. Biocontrol mechanisms of antagonist microorganisms are antibios

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Özaktan, H., Aysan, Y., Yıldız, F., Kınay, P. (2016). Fitopatolojide biyolojik mücadele. Türkiye Biyolojik Mücadele Dergisi, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1, 61–78. https://ajindex.com/articles/1435061

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (48)

  1. arras, g., 1996. mode of action of an isolate of Candida famata in biological control of Penicillium digitatum in orange fruits. Postharvest Biology and Technology 8: 191-198.
  2. Biopesticides URL: http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/biopesticide, [erişim: 11.10.2009].
  3. Biopesticides URL: http://ppis.ceris.purdue.edu/npublic.htm, [erişim: 11.10.2009].
  4. Bora, T. ve T. Nemli, 1973. An investigation on soil fungistasis in İzmir. Journal of Turkish Phytopathology 2: 49-54.
  5. Bora, T. ve H. Özaktan, 1996. Antagonistik bazı floresent pseudomonasların önemli kültür mantarı hastalıklarına karşı in vitro etkileri üzerinde araştırmalar. Türkiye 5. Yemeklik Mantar Kongresi Bildiri Özetleri, 5-7 Kasım 1996, Yalova, s:267-273.
  6. Bora, T. ve H. Özaktan, 1998. Bitki hastalıklarıyla biyolojik savaş. Prizma Matbaası, İzmir. 205 s.
  7. Chalutz, E., Droby, S., Cohen, L E., Weiss, B., Barkai-Golan, O., Daus, A., Fuchs Y. and C. L. Wilson, 1990. Biological control of Botrytis, Rhizopus, and Alternaria rots of tomato fruit by Pichia guilliermondii. Biological Control of Postharvest Diseases of Fruit and Vegetables Workshop Proceedings, Shepherdtown, West Wirginia, Sept. 12-14, pp: 71-85.
  8. Chet, I. and R. Baker, 1981. Isolation and biocontrol potential of Trichoderma hamatum from soil naturally suppressive of Rhizoctonia solani. Phytopathology, 71: 286-290.
  9. Costa, A. S. and G. W. Muller, 1980. Tristeza control by cross protection: a USBrazil coperative success. Plant Disease, 64: 538-541.
  10. Dede, Y. ve M. Biçici, 1988. Phytophthora citrophthora’nın limonlarda neden olduğu zamklanma hastalığının oluşum düzeyi, etmenin topraktaki dağılımı ve bu hastalığa karşı antagonist Trichoderma türlerinin kullanılması. V. Türkiye Fitopatoloji Kongresi Bildirileri, s:149-153.
  11. Droby, S., Hofstein, R., Wilson, C. L.,. Wisniewski, M, Fridlander, B., Cohen, L., Weiss, B., Daus, A., Timar, D. and E. Chalutz, 1993. Pilot testing of Pichia guilliermondii: a biocontrol agent of postharvest diseases of citrus fruits. Biological Control, 3: 47-52.
  12. Droby, S., Linschinsky, S., Cohen, L., Manulis, S., Mehra R. K. and J. W. Eckert, 1995. Epiphytic yeasts of citrus tolerant to extreme conditions are effective antagonist green mold decay on Ankara pear. Journal of Turkish Phytopathology 27: 27-37.
  13. El-Ghaouth, A., Smilanick J. L. and C. L. Wilson, 2000. Enhancement of the performance of Candida saitioana by the addidition of glycochitosan for the control of postharvest decay of apple and citrus fruit. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 19: 103-110.
  14. Elad, Y., I. Chet, P. Boyle and Y. Henis, 1983. Parasitism of Trichoderma spp. on Rhizoctonia solani and Sclerotium rolfsii, scanning electron microscopy and fluorescence microscopy. Phytopathology, 73: 85-88.
  15. Elad, Y. and R. Baker, 1985. The role of competitium for iron and carbon in suppression of chlamydospore germination of Fusarium spp. by Pseudomonas spp. Phytopathology, 75: 1053-1059.
  16. Erkılıç, A. ve A. Çınar, 1988. Limon ağaçları fillosfer mikroflorasının in-vitro’da Phoma tracheiphila’ya antagonistik etkileri. V. Türkiye Fitopatoloji Kongresi Bildiri Özetleri, s:95.
  17. Filnow, A.B. 1998. Role of competition for sugars by yeasts in the biological of gray mold and blue mold of apple. Biocontrol Science Technology, 8: 243-256.
  18. Janisiewicz, W., 2007. Commercial applications and future prospects for the use of biocontrol after harvest. COST Action 924. Prooceedings of the International Congress: Novel Approaches for the Control of Postharvest Diseases and Disorders, Bologna, Italy, 3-5 May, 2007, pp: 9-18.
  19. Kapper, J. M. and H. E. Waterworth, 1977. Cucumber mosaic virus associated RNA 5: Causal agent for tomato necrosis. Science, 196: 429-431.
  20. Katz, H., Bercovitz, A., Chalutz, E., Droby, S., Hofstein R. and M. Keren-Tzoor, 1995. Compatibility of ecogens biofungicide Aspire a yeast based preparation, with other commonly used for the control of postharvest decay of citrus. Phytopathology 85: 1123.
  21. Kerr, A. and K. Htay, 1974. Biological control of crown gall through bacteriocin production. Physiological Plant Pathology, 4: 37-44.
  22. Kınay, P., Yıldız, M., Şen, F., Öngen G. ve L. Akdoğan, 2005. Turunçgillerde hasat sonrası Penicillium çürüklüklerine karşı maya biyoformülasyonlarının geliştirilmesi ve kullanımı. TUBITAK TOVAG 2931 No’lu proje kesin raporu.
  23. Kınay, P. and M. Yıldız, 2008. The shelflife and effectiveness of granular formulations of Metschnikowia pulcherrima and Pichia guilliermondii yeast isolates that control postharvest decay of citrus fruit. Biological Control, 45: 433–440.
  24. Kurtzman, C. P., and S. Droby, 2001. Metschnikowia fructicola, a new ascosporic yeast with potential for biocontrol of postharvest fruit rots. Systematic Applied Microbiology 24:395-399.
  25. Lima, G., Ippolito, A., Nigro, F. and M. Salerno, 1997. Effectiviness of Aurobasidium pullulans and Candida oleiphila against postharvest strawberry rots. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 10: 169-178.
  26. Liu, L., Kloepper, J. W. and S. Tuzun, 1995. Induction of systemic resistance in cucumber against bacterial angular leaf spotby plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Phytopathology, 85: 843-847.
  27. Lurie, S., Droby, S., Chalupowicz, L. and E. Chalutz, 1995. Efficacy of Candida oleiphila strain 182 in preventing Penicillium expansum infection of nectarine fruits. Phytoparasitica, 23: 231-234.
  28. Mclaughlin, r. j., Wilson, c. l., Droby, S., ben-arie, r. and E. Chalutz, 1992. Biological control of postharvest diseases of grape, peach and apple with the yeast Kloeckera apiculata and Candida guilliermondii. Plant Disease, 76: 470-473.
  29. New, P. B. and A. Kerr, 1972. Biological control of crown gall: field measurements and glasshouse experiments. Journal of Applied Bacteriology, 35: 279-287.
  30. Özaktan, H. and T. Bora, 2004. Biological control of fire blight in pear orchards with a formulation of Pantoea agglomerans strain Eh 24. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, 35: 224-229.
  31. Petersson, S., Jonsson, N. and J. Schnürer, 1999. Pichia anomola as a biocontrol agent during storage of high-moisture feed grain under airtight conditions. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 15: 175-184.
  32. Pusey, Y. and C. L. Wilson, 1984. Postharvest biological control of stone fruit brown rot by Bacillus subtilis. Plant Diseases, 68: 753.
  33. Rast, A. T. B., 1972. MII-16, an artificial symtomless mutant of tobacco mosaic virus for seedling inoculation of tomato crops. Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology, 78: 110-112.
  34. Roberts, R.G., 1990. Postharvest biological control of gray mold of apple by Cryptococcus laurentii. Phytopathology, 80: 526-530.
  35. Scher, F. M. and R. Baker, 1982. Effect of Pseudomonas putida and a synthetic iron chelator on induction of soil suppressiveness to Fusarium wilt pathogens. Phytopathology, 72: 171-176.
  36. Schisler, D. A., Kurtzman, C. P., Bothast, R. J. and P. J. Slininger, 1995. Evaluation of yeast for biological control of Fusarium dry rot of potatoes. American Potato Journals, 72: 339-353.
  37. Speakman, J. B., 1984. The effect of inoculation of wheat with Gaeumannomyces graminis var. graminis on the take-all disease caused by G. graminis var. tritici. Phytopathogishche Zeitschrift, 109: 188-191.
  38. Stanford, G. B., 1926. Some factors affecting the pathogenicity of Actinomyces scabies. Phytopathology, 16: 525-527.
  39. Turhan, G. and F. Grossmann, 1986. Investigation of a great number of Actinomycetes isolates on their antagonistic effects against soil borne fungal pathogens by an improved method. Journal Phytopathology, 116: 238-243.
  40. Tuzun, S. and J. Kuc, 1983. New technique which immunizes against blue mold (Peronospora hyoscyami f. sp tabacina) and increases growth of tobacco. Phytopathology, 73: 823.
  41. Van Alfen, N. K., 1982. Biology and potential disease control of hypovirülence of Endothia parasitica. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 73: 132-135.
  42. Weindling, R., 1934. Studies on lethal principle effective in the parasitic action of Trichoderma lignorum on Rhizoctonia solani and other soil fungi. Phytopathology, 24: 1153-1179. Weindling, R., 1937. Isolation of toxic substances from the culture flitrates of Trichoderma on Gliocladium. Phytopathology, 27: 1175-1177. Weindling, R., 1941. Experimental consideration of the mold toxin of Gliocladium and Trichoderma. Phytopathology, 31: 991-1003.
  43. Wilson, C. L. and m. e. Wisniewski, 1989. Postharvest biological control of Penicillium rots of citrus with antagonistic yeasts and bacteria. Scientica Horticulture, 40: 105-112.
  44. Wilson, C. L., Wisniewski, m. e., Biles, C. L., McLaughlin, r. j., Chalutz, E. and S. Droby, 1991. Biological control of postharvest diseases of fruits and vegetables: alternative to synthetic fungicides. Crop Protection, 10: 172-177.
  45. Wisniewski, M. E., Biles, C. and S. Droby, 1990. The use of the yeast Pichia guillieromondii as a biocontrol agent: characterization of attachment to Botrytis cinerea. Biological Control of Postharvest Diseases of Fruit and Vegetables
  46. Workshop Proceedings, Shepherdtown, West Winginia, Sept. 12-14, pp: 167-169. 78 Fitopatolojide biyolojik mücadele Wymore, L. A. and R. Baker,
  47. Wymore, L. A. and R. Baker, 1982. Factors affecting cross protection in control of Fusarium wilt of tomato. Plant Disease, 66: 908-910
  48. Roberts, R.G., 1990. Postharvest biological control of gray mold of apple by Cryptococcus laurentii. Phytopathology, 80: 526-530.