KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / NİŞANTAŞI ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER DERGİSİ / 2026 / Cilt: 13 Sayı: 2

TÜRKİYE’DE ÇEVRE KALİTESİ: FİNANS-TARIM-ENERJİ ÜÇGENİNDEN İÇGÖRÜLER

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY IN TÜRKIYE: INSIGHTS FROM THE FINANCE-AGRICULTURE-ENERGY TRIANGLE

Ender Baykut(AFYON KOCATEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-3908-4008
Sayfa
735–752
Yayın Tarihi
2025-12-31
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

ARDL sınır testi yaklaşımından elde edilen bulgular, uzun dönemde tarımsal alan genişlemesinin, çevresel sürdürülebilirliğe katkı sağladığını gösterirken; tarımsal katma değerdeki ve finansal gelişmişlik endeksindeki artışların ise çevresel kalite üzerinde baskı oluşturduğunu ortaya koymaktadır.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Çevre ekonomisi üzerine yapılan çalışmalar ağırlıklı olarak çevresel bozulmaları odağına almaktadır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Literatürdeki çalışmalardan farklı olarak bu çalışma, çevresel kalitenin uzun ve kısa dönem belirleyicilerini tarımsal ve finansal göstergeleri odağına alarak araştırmaktadır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:ARDL sınır testi yaklaşımından elde edilen bulgular, uzun dönemde tarımsal alan genişlemesinin, çevresel sürdürülebilirliğe katkı sağladığını gösterirken; tarımsal katma değerdeki ve finansal gelişmişlik endeksindeki artışların ise çevresel kalite üzerinde baskı oluşturduğunu ortaya koymaktadır.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Finansal Gelişmişlik Endeksi · Tarımsal Katma Değer · Yenilenebilir Enerji

Özet

Çevre ekonomisi üzerine yapılan çalışmalar ağırlıklı olarak çevresel bozulmaları odağına almaktadır. Literatürdeki çalışmalardan farklı olarak bu çalışma, çevresel kalitenin uzun ve kısa dönem belirleyicilerini tarımsal ve finansal göstergeleri odağına alarak araştırmaktadır. ARDL sınır testi yaklaşımından elde edilen bulgular, uzun dönemde tarımsal alan genişlemesinin, çevresel sürdürülebilirliğe katkı sağladığını gösterirken; tarımsal katma değerdeki ve finansal gelişmişlik endeksindeki artışların ise çevresel kalite üzerinde baskı oluşturduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Yenilenebilir enerji tüketiminin çevresel kalite üzerindeki etkisi ise anlamsızdır. Ayrıca, yenilenebilir enerji tüketiminden çevresel kaliteye doğru nedensellik ilişkisi yokken, çevresel kaliteden yenilenebilir enerjiye doğru tek yönlü bir nedensellik ilişkisi tespit edilmiştir. Tarımsal katma değer ile çevre kalitesi arasında tespit edilen çift yönlü nedensellik, bu iki değişken arasında karşılıklı bir etkileşim ve geri besleme ilişkisi olduğuna işaret etmektedir. Ayrıca, çevre kalitesinden finansal gelişmişliğe doğru olan tek yönlü nedensellik ilişkisi, yatırım kararlarının çevresel sürdürülebilirlik kriterlerini dikkate alarak şekillendirildiğini göstermektedir. Sonuç olarak çalışma, çevresel sürdürülebilirliğin sağlanmasında tarımsal göstergelerin ve finansal gelişmenin çok yönlü ve dinamik etkileşimlerini ortaya koyarken, sürdürülebilir kalkınma hedeflerine ulaşmak için daha bütüncül politika yaklaşımlarının gerekliliğine dikkat çekmektedir.

Abstract

Studies on environmental economics mainly focus on environmental degradation. In contrast to the previous studies, this study examines the long-run and short-run determinants of environmental quality by focusing on agricultural indicators and financial indicators. The findings from the ARDL bounds test indicate that the expansion of agricultural land contributes to long-term environmental sustainability. However, increases in agricultural value added and financial development index exert pressure on environmental quality. Moreover, the effect of renewable energy consumption on environmental quality is statistically insignificant. While there is no causal relationship from renewable energy consumption to environmental quality, there is a unidirectional causality relationship from environmental quality to renewable energy. The bidirectional causality between agricultural value added and environmental quality indicates a mutual interaction and feedback loop among these variables. Moreover, the unidirectional causality relationship from environmental quality to financial development demonstrates that investment decisions are shaped by considering environmental sustainability concerns. In conclusion, the study reveals the multifaceted and dynamic interactions of agricultural indicators and financial development in achieving environmental sustainability. It draws attention to the necessity of more holistic policy approaches to achieve sustainable development goals (SDGs).

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Baykut, E. (2025). TÜRKİYE’DE ÇEVRE KALİTESİ: FİNANS-TARIM-ENERJİ ÜÇGENİNDEN İÇGÖRÜLER. NİŞANTAŞI ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER DERGİSİ, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 2, 735–752. https://doi.org/10.52122/nisantasisbd.1753309

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (100)

  1. Acaroğlu, H., & Güllü, M. (2022). Climate change caused by renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and economic growth: A time series ARDL analysis for Turkey. Renewable Energy, 193, 434–447.
  2. Acheampong, A. O. (2019). Modelling for insight: Does financial development improve environmental quality? Energy Economics, 83, 156–179.
  3. Agrawal, R., Agrawal, S., Samadhiya, A., Kumar, A., Luthra, S., & Jain, V. (2024). Adoption of green finance and green innovation for achieving circularity: An exploratory review and future directions. Geoscience Frontiers, 15(4), 101669.
  4. Ali, A., Xiangyu, G., & Radulescu, M. (2025). Investigating the impact of agricultural value added and agricultural components (rice production, inorganic fertilizers and livestock production) on the ecological footprint in emerging economies in Asia. Cogent Food and Agriculture, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2025.2522334
  5. Al-Mulali, U., Solarin, S. A., Sheau-Ting, L., & Ozturk, I. (2016). Does moving towards renewable energy cause water and land inefficiency? An empirical investigation. Energy Policy, 93, 303–314.
  6. Al-Mulali, U., Weng-Wai, C., Sheau-Ting, L., & Mohammed, A. H. (2015). Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis by utilizing the ecological footprint as an indicator of environmental degradation. Ecological Indicators, 48, 315–323.
  7. Aluko, O. A., & Obalade, A. A. (2020). Financial development and environmental quality in Sub-Saharan Africa: Is there a technology effect? Science of the Total Environment, 747, 141515.
  8. Ashraf, A., Nguyen, C. P., & Doytch, N. (2022). The impact of financial development on ecological footprints of nations. Journal of Environmental Management, 322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116062
  9. Asiedu, B. A., & Boahen, E. A. (2022). The impact of stock market capitalisation, international investment, clean energy on CO₂ emissions: New insight from listed domestic companies in Belgium. Annals of Environmental Science and Toxicology, 6(1), 26–34.
  10. Atsu, F., Adams, S., & Adjei, J. (2021). ICT, energy consumption, financial development, and environmental degradation in South Africa. Heliyon, 7(7), e07328.
  11. Awan, A., Hossain, M. E., Ngoc, B. H., Yusoff, N. Y. bte M., & Tiwari, A. K. (2025). Investigating the time-invariant impact of agriculture on environmental degradation: focusing on pesticide use, human capital, and green energy. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2025.2504522
  12. Aydoğan, B., & Vardar, G. (2020). Evaluating the role of renewable energy, economic growth and agriculture on CO₂ emission in E7 countries. International Journal of Sustainable Energy, 39(4), 335–348.
  13. Bai, J., & Perron, P. (1998). Estimating and testing linear models with multiple structural changes. Econometrica, 66(1), 47–78.
  14. Bekun, F. V. (2022). Mitigating emissions in India: Accounting for the role of real income, renewable energy consumption and investment in energy. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 12(1), 188–192.
  15. Bekun, F. V., Alola, A. A., & Sarkodie, S. A. (2019). Toward a sustainable environment: Nexus between CO₂ emissions, resource rent, renewable and nonrenewable energy in 16-EU countries. Science of the Total Environment, 657, 1023–1029.
  16. Bui, D. T. (2020). Transmission channels between financial development and CO₂ emissions: A global perspective. Heliyon, 6(11). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05478
  17. Cai, Y., Xu, J., Ahmad, P., & Anwar, A. (2022). What drives carbon emissions in the long-run? The role of renewable energy and agriculture in achieving the sustainable development goals. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 35(1), 4603–4624.
  18. Chandio, A. A., Akram, W., Ozturk, I., Ahmad, M., & Ahmad, F. (2021). Towards long-term sustainable environment: Does agriculture and renewable energy consumption matter? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(38), 53141–53160.
  19. Chen, Y., Zhao, J., Lai, Z., Wang, Z., & Xia, H. (2019). Exploring the effects of economic growth, and renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on China’s CO₂ emissions: Evidence from a regional panel analysis. Renewable Energy, 140, 341–353.
  20. Chowdhury, S., Khan, S., Sarker, M. F. H., Islam, M. K., Tamal, M. A., & Khan, N. A. (2022). Does agricultural ecology cause environmental degradation? Empirical evidence from Bangladesh. Heliyon, 8(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09750
  21. Danish, Baloch, M. A., Mahmood, N., & Zhang, J. W. (2019). Effect of natural resources, renewable energy and economic development on CO₂ emissions in BRICS countries. Science of the Total Environment, 678, 632–638.
  22. Dao, N. B., Dogan, B., Ghosh, S., Kazemzadeh, E., & Radulescu, M. (2024). Toward sustainable ecology: How do environmental technologies, green financial policies, energy uncertainties, and natural resources rents matter? Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 26, 1–19.
  23. Destek, M. A., & Sinha, A. (2020). Renewable, non-renewable energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and ecological footprint: Evidence from Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 242, 118537.
  24. Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366), 427–431.
  25. Djellouli, N., Abdelli, L., Elheddad, M., Ahmed, R., & Mahmood, H. (2022). The effects of non-renewable energy, renewable energy, economic growth, and foreign direct investment on the sustainability of African countries. Renewable Energy, 183, 676–686.
  26. Dogan, E., & Ozturk, I. (2017). The influence of renewable and non-renewable and real income on CO₂ emissions in the USA: Evidence from structural break tests. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24, 10846–10854.
  27. Dogan, M., Georgescu, I., Çestepe, H., Sarıgül, S.S. & Tatar, H.E. (2025). Renewable Energy Consumption and the Ecological Footprint in Denmark: Assessing the Influence of Financial Development and Agricultural Contribution. Agriculture, 2025, 15, 835.
  28. Ekwueme, D., Zoaka, J., & Alola, A. (2021). Carbon emission effect of renewable energy utilization, fiscal development, and foreign direct investment in South Africa. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 1–13. Engle, R. F., & Granger, C. W. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica, 55(2), 251–276.
  29. FAO. (2025). The future of food and agriculture – Trends and challenges (Annual Report). Erişim Tarihi: 11 Temmuz 2025
  30. Ghasemnejad, A., Khoshbakht, K., Mahmoudi, H., & Sayahnia, R. (2025). Understanding the socioeconomic and environmental drivers of agricultural land conversion in Babol County, Northern Iran: Implications for sustainable land use policies. Land Use Policy, 157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107651
  31. Gielen, D., Boshell, F., Saygin, D., Bazilian, M. D., Wagner, N., & Gorini, R. (2019). The role of renewable energy in the global energy transformation. Energy Strategy Reviews, 24, 38–50.
  32. Global Footprint Network. (2024). Earth Overshoot Day 2025 falls on June 24th. Retrieved from https://www.footprintnetwork.org/
  33. Gokmenoglu, K. K., & Taspinar, N. (2018). Testing the agriculture-induced EKC hypothesis: The case of Pakistan. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25, 22829–22841.
  34. Gollin, D., Parente, S., & Rogerson, R. (2002). The role of agriculture in development. American Economic Review, 92(2), 160–164. Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353–377.
  35. Guo, X., & Shahbaz, M. (2024). The existence of environmental Kuznets curve: Critical look and future implications for environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 351, 119648.
  36. Hafeez, M., Yuan, C., Shah, W. U. H., Mahmood, M. T., Li, X., & Iqbal, K. (2020). Evaluating the relationship among agriculture, energy demand, finance and environmental degradation in one belt and one road economies. Carbon Management, 11(2), 139–154.
  37. Han, Z., Wei, Y., Johnston, K., & Head, B. (2023). Stakeholder engagement in natural resources for energy transitions governance. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 102, 107206.
  38. Hewson, J., Razafimanahaka, J. H., Wright, T. M., Mandimbiniaina, R., Mulligan, M., Jones, J. P.,. & Rasolohery, A. (2019). Land change modeling to inform strategic decisions on forest cover and CO₂ emissions in eastern Madagascar. Environmental Conservation, 46, 25–33.
  39. Hunjra, A. I., Tayachi, T., Chani, M. I., Verhoeven, P., & Mehmood, A. (2020). The moderating effect of institutional quality on the financial development and environmental quality nexus. Sustainability, 12 (9), https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093805
  40. IEA (2025). International Energy Agency. https://www.iea.org/analysis?type=report Erişim Tarihi: 11 Temmuz 2025
  41. IMF (2025). International Monetary Fund. IMF Data Portal. https://www.imf.org/en/Data Erişim Tarihi: 7 Temmuz 2025
  42. Jebli, M. B., & Youssef, S. B. (2017). The role of renewable energy and agriculture in reducing CO₂ emissions: Evidence for North Africa countries. Ecological Indicators, 74, 295–301.
  43. Jiang, G., et al. (2022). Effect of agricultural employment and export diversification index on environmental pollution: Building the agenda towards sustainability. Sustainability, 14(2), 677.
  44. Jiang, Q., Khattak, S. I., & Rahman, Z. U. (2021). Measuring the simultaneous effects of electricity consumption and production on carbon emissions (CO₂e) in China: New evidence from an EKC-based assessment. Energy, 229, 120616.
  45. Johansen, S., & Juselius, K. (1990). Maximum likelihood estimation and inferences on cointegration—with applications to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52(2), 169–210.
  46. Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P. C., Schmidt, P., & Shin, Y. (1992). Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root? Journal of Econometrics, 54(1-3), 159–178.
  47. Li, Q., He, H., Oskenbayev, Y., & Ullah, I. (2024). Exploring the nexus of geopolitical risk, green financing, and natural resource rents: A study of Russia’s economic growth. Resources Policy, 96, 105199.
  48. Liu, X., Zhang, S., & Bae, J. (2017). The nexus of renewable energy-agriculture-environment in BRICS. Applied Energy, 204, 489–496.
  49. Luo, J., Zhao, C., Chen, Q., & Li, G. (2022). Using deep belief network to construct the agricultural information system based on internet of things. The Journal of Supercomputing, 78(1), 379–405.
  50. Majeed, M. T., & Mazhar, M. (2019). Financial development and ecological footprint: A global panel data analysis. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences (PJCSS), 13(2), 487–514.
  51. Mulatu, D. W., Eshete, Z. S., & Gatiso, T. S. (2016). The impact of CO₂ emissions on agricultural productivity and household welfare in Ethiopia: A computable general equilibrium analysis. Environment and Development, 21, 8–16.
  52. Musah, M., Owusu-Akomeah, M., Kumah, E., Adjei Mensah, I., Nyeadi, J., Murshed, M., & Alfred, M. (2022). Green investments, financial development and environmental quality in Ghana: Evidence from a novel dynamic ARDL simulations approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 29, 31972–32001.
  53. Narayan, P. K. (2005). The saving and investment nexus for China: Evidence from cointegration tests. Applied Economics, 37(17), 1979–1990.
  54. Nasir, M. A., Huynh, T. L. D., & Tram, H. T. X. (2019). Role of financial development, economic growth & foreign direct investment in driving climate change: A case of emerging ASEAN. Journal of Environmental Management, 242, 131–141.
  55. Nguyen, K. H., & Kakinaka, M. (2019). Renewable energy consumption, carbon emissions, and development stages: Some evidence from panel cointegration analysis. Renewable Energy, 132, 1049–1057.
  56. Nor, B. A., & Mohamad, A. (2024). The causal connection between CO2 emissions and agricultural productivity in Somalia: evidence from an ARDL Bounds Testing Approach. Cogent Food and Agriculture, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2024.2428369
  57. Nor, B. A., Yusof, Y., & Warsame, Z. A. (2024). Exploring the potential for renewable energy consumption in reducing environmental degradation in Somalia. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 14(5), 643–650.
  58. Olumba, C. C., Alimba, J. O., & Tasie, O. (2019). Assessing the factors influencing access to land for urban agriculture in Southeast Nigeria. AgEcon Search. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.303580
  59. OWD (2025). Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/ Erişim Tarihi: 28 Haziran 2025
  60. Ozturk, I., Farooq, S., Majeed, M. T., & Skare, M. (2024). An empirical investigation of financial development and ecological footprint in South Asia: Bridging the EKC and pollution haven hypotheses. Geoscience Frontiers, 15(4). Pata, U. K. & Yurtkuran, S. (2018). Yenilenebilir Enerji Tüketimi, Nüfus Yoğunluğu ve Finansal Gelişmenin CO2 Salımına Etkisi: Türkiye Örneği. UİİİD-IJEAS, Prof. Dr. Harun Terzi Özel Sayısı, 303-318. Pata, U. K. (2021). Linking renewable energy, globalization, agriculture, CO₂ emissions and ecological footprint in BRIC countries: A sustainability perspective. Renewable Energy, 173, 197–208. Pata, U. K., & Naimoglu, M. (2024). How renewable and nuclear energy-related research and development expenditures pave the way for curbing carbon emissions in France? Energy & Environment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X241258798
  61. Pata, U. K., & Samour, A. (2022). Do renewable and nuclear energy enhance environmental quality in France? A new EKC approach with the load capacity factor. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 149, 104249.
  62. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16, 289–326. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.616
  63. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289–326.
  64. Phillips, P. C., & Ouliaris, S. (1990). Asymptotic properties of residual based tests for cointegration. Econometrica, 58(1), 165–193.
  65. Phillips, P., & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335–346.
  66. Qamri, G. M., Sheng, B., Adeel-Farooq, R. M., & Alam, G. M. (2022). The criticality of FDI in environmental degradation through financial development and economic growth: Implications for promoting the green sector. Resources Policy, 78, 102765.
  67. Qiao, H., Zheng, F., Jiang, H., & Dong, K. (2019). The greenhouse effect of the agriculture-economic growth-renewable energy nexus: Evidence from G20 countries. Science of the Total Environment, 671, 722–731.
  68. Rafiq, S., Salim, R., & Apergis, N. (2016). Agriculture, trade openness and emissions: An empirical analysis and policy options. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 60(3), 348–365.
  69. Raihan, A., Muhtasim, D. A., Farhana, S., Hasan, M. A. U., Pavel, M. I., Faruk, O.,. & Rahman, M. (2023). An econometric analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from different agricultural factors in Bangladesh. Energy Nexus, 9, 100179.
  70. Ritchie, H. (2023). How much of global greenhouse gas emissions come from plastics? Our World in Data. Retrieved June 8, 2025, from https://ourworldindata.org/greenhouse-gas-emissions-food
  71. Ruza, C., & Caro-Carretero, R. (2022). The non-linear impact of financial development on environmental quality and sustainability: Evidence from G7 countries. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(14).
  72. Saud, S., Chen, S., Danish, & Haseeb, A. (2019). Impact of financial development and economic growth on environmental quality: An empirical analysis from Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(3), 2253–2269.
  73. Selvanathan, S., Jayasinghe, M. S., Selvanathan, E. A., Abbas, S. A., & Iftekhar, M. S. (2023). Energy consumption, agriculture, forestation and CO2 emission nexus: an application to OECD countries. Applied Economics, 55(37), 4359–4376.
  74. Sharif, A., Baris-Tuzemen, O., Uzuner, G., Ozturk, I., & Sinha, A. (2020). Revisiting the role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on Turkey’s ecological footprint: Evidence from quantile ARDL approach. Sustainable Cities and Society, 57, 102138.
  75. Siche, R., Pereira, L., Agostinho, F., & Ortega, E. (2010). Convergence of ecological footprint and emergy analysis as a sustainability indicator of countries: Peru as case study. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 15(10), 3182–3192.
  76. Toda, H. Y., & Yamamoto, T. (1995). Statistical inference in vector autoregression with possibly integrated processes. Journal of Econometrics, 66(1–2), 225–250.
  77. Usman, M., & Makhdum, M. S. A. (2021). What abates ecological footprint in BRICS-T region? Exploring the influence of renewable energy, non-renewable energy, agriculture, forest area and financial development. Renewable Energy, 179, 12–28.
  78. Usman, M., Anwar, S., Yaseen, M., Makhdum, M., Kousar, R., & Jahanger, A. (2021). Unveiling the dynamic relationship between agriculture value addition, energy utilization, tourism and environmental degradation in South Asia. Journal of Public Affairs. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2712
  79. Uzar, U., & Eyuboglu, K. (2024). Testing the asymmetric impacts of income inequality, financial development and human development on ecological footprint in Türkiye: A NARDL approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142652
  80. Wang, C., Wang, J., & Ai, W. (2024). Do urbanization, environmental regulation and GDP affect agricultural land use efficiency? Implications for just transition. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107421
  81. Wang, J., & Zhang, Z. (2023). Impact of renewable energy and agriculture on mineral resources rents: Do economic and environmental aspects matter. Resources Policy, 87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104281
  82. Wang, Z., Pham, T. L. H., Sun, K., Wang, B., Bui, Q., & Hashemizadeh, A. (2022). The moderating role of financial development in the renewable energy consumption–CO₂ emissions linkage: The case study of Next-11 countries. Energy, 254, 124386.
  83. Wijethunga, A. W. G. C. N., Rahman, M. M., & Sarker, T. (2025). Analyzing financial development’s moderating role on the investment–environmental quality nexus: Evidence from Australia using Autoregressive Distributed Lag approach. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 25, 100568.
  84. Wijethunga, A. W. G. C. N., Rahman, M. M., & Sarker, T. (2025). Does financial development moderate the relationship between economic growth and environmental quality? Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2025.100728
  85. World Bank (2025). Climate-smart agriculture. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/climate-smart-agriculture Erişim Tarihi: 22 Haziran 2025
  86. World Bank. (2025). World development indicators (Data Bank). https://databank.worldbank.org/home.aspx Erişim Tarihi: 22 Haziran 2025
  87. Xiong, F., Zhang, R., & Mo, H. (2023). The mediating effect of financial development on CO₂ emissions: An empirical study based on provincial panel data in China. Science of the Total Environment, 896, 165220.
  88. Xu, D., Sheraz, M., Hassan, A., Sinha, A., & Ullah, S. (2022). Financial development, renewable energy and CO₂ emission in G7 countries: New evidence from non-linear and asymmetric analysis. Energy Economics, 109, 105994.
  89. Xu, X., Huang, S., & An, H. (2021). Identification and causal analysis of the influence channels of financial development on CO₂ emissions. Energy Policy, 153, 112277.
  90. Xuezhou, W., Manu, E. K., & Akowuah, I. N. (2022). Financial development and environmental quality: The role of economic growth among the regional economies of Sub-Saharan Africa. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(16), 23069–23093.
  91. Zaman, S., Zaman, Q. uz, Zhang, L., Wang, Z., & Jehan, N. (2022). Interaction between agricultural production, female employment, renewable energy, and environmental quality: Policy directions in context of developing economies. Renewable Energy, 186, 288–298.
  92. Cai, Y., Xu, J., Ahmad, P., & Anwar, A. (2022). What drives carbon emissions in the long-run? The role of renewable energy and agriculture in achieving the sustainable development goals. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 35(1), 4603–4624.
  93. FAO. (2025). The future of food and agriculture – Trends and challenges (Annual Report). Erişim Tarihi: 11 Temmuz 2025
  94. Hewson, J., Razafimanahaka, J. H., Wright, T. M., Mandimbiniaina, R., Mulligan, M., Jones, J. P.,. & Rasolohery, A. (2019). Land change modeling to inform strategic decisions on forest cover and CO₂ emissions in eastern Madagascar. Environmental Conservation, 46, 25–33.
  95. IEA (2025). International Energy Agency. https://www.iea.org/analysis?type=report Erişim Tarihi: 11 Temmuz 2025
  96. IMF (2025). International Monetary Fund. IMF Data Portal. https://www.imf.org/en/Data Erişim Tarihi: 7 Temmuz 2025
  97. OWD (2025). Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/ Erişim Tarihi: 28 Haziran 2025
  98. Raihan, A., Muhtasim, D. A., Farhana, S., Hasan, M. A. U., Pavel, M. I., Faruk, O.,. & Rahman, M. (2023). An econometric analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from different agricultural factors in Bangladesh. Energy Nexus, 9, 100179.
  99. World Bank (2025). Climate-smart agriculture. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/climate-smart-agriculture Erişim Tarihi: 22 Haziran 2025
  100. World Bank. (2025). World development indicators (Data Bank). https://databank.worldbank.org/home.aspx Erişim Tarihi: 22 Haziran 2025