Dergiler / Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics / 2019 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3

The impact of design approach and contracting practices on cost and execution period of school buildings

Sayfa
85–95
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The findings are of relevance to researchers, education planners, and practitioners as they are of high importance to policy makers and financiers whose main concern is to meet the growing need for school accommodation.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:More than two million school-age children in Yemen are unable to enroll in education because of a shortage of school buildings.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This is one of the reasons the country missed the Millennium Development Goal of achieving Education for all by 2015.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The findings are of relevance to researchers, education planners, and practitioners as they are of high importance to policy makers and financiers whose main concern is to meet the growing need for school accommodation.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2015 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

More than two million school-age children in Yemen are unable to enroll in education because of a shortage of school buildings. This is one of the reasons the country missed the Millennium Development Goal of achieving Education for all by 2015. The struggle to afford school accommodation will continue, because of the lack of re-sources and high unit cost. Construction cost as time schedule for an identical school building vary by the implementing agency. This paper aims to study in-depth this multi-dimensional issue to find out the factors that lead to this variation, as well as the reasons for the high unit cost and lengthy periods of construction. To achieve this objective, comprehensive raw data that was resourced from agencies that are as-signed to implement the largest part of the construction program along with data collected through questionnaires and semi-structured interviews were utilized. Complete sets of design and contracting documents of representative schools were used for deeper analysis and evaluation. The analysis shows that the employed de-sign approaches lead to large structural elements and consequently to longer imple-mentation period and 30% increase in cost. It also shows that contractors add up to 20% for the client’s procurement procedure, approvals, and payment cycle. Addition-ally, bidders price risks related to accessibility to building sites, availability of build-ing materials, and how trouble-prone is the region. The findings are of relevance to researchers, education planners, and practitioners as they are of high importance to policy makers and financiers whose main concern is to meet the growing need for school accommodation.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ALMUNİFİ, A. A., ALAMERİ, I. A. (2019). The impact of design approach and contracting practices on cost and execution period of school buildings. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3, 85–95. https://ajindex.com/articles/142773

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (8)

  1. AL-kohlani M (2009). An investigation of the causes and extent of delay and cost overrun in school construction projects in Yemen. M.Sc. thesis, Bartlett School of Graduate Studies- University College Lon-don, UK. AlMunifi A (1997). Lessons learned from Yemen earthquakes - engi-neering and environmental aspects. 29th General Assembly of IASPEI. Thessaloniki, Greece. AlMunifi A (2004). The vision of the Ministry of Education: Programs and policies. The Pre-appraisal Workshop for the Preparation of the Basic Education Development Project. Sana’a, Yemen. Brown G (2013). Accelerating progress to 2015-Yemen. A Report Se-ries to the UN Special Envoy for Global Education. Choudhry R, Gabriel HF, Khan MK, Azhar S (2017). Causes of discrepan-cies between design and construction in the Pakistan construction in-dustry. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 22(2), 1–18.
  2. Döring C (2010). Cross-Sector and Multi-Institutional Assessments Study on School Construction Costs in Yemen. The Proceedings of the 13th Architecture & Behaviour Colloquium. Lausanne, Switzer-land. Dosumu OS (2018). Perceived effects of prevalent errors in contract documents on construction projects. Construction Economics and Building, 18(1), 1–26.
  3. Fast Track Initiative (2004). Yemen experience with the fast track ini-tiative. Fast Track Initiative Partnership Meeting. Brasilia. GET German Education and Training (2008). School Construction Costs in Yemen. Sana’a, Yemen. Government of Yemen (2018). Yemen Constitution. retrieved from http://www.yemen.gov.ye/. Jan 2019.
  4. Günhan S, Arditi D, Doyle J (2007). Avoiding change orders in public school construction. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 133(1), 67–73.
  5. Khan Q, Chase S (2003). Yemen and the Millennium Development Goals. Working Paper Series. The World Bank. Laryea S, Hughes W (2008). How contractors price risk in bids: Theory and practice, Construction Management and Economics, 26(9), 911–924.
  6. Ministry of Education (2003). Analysis of the school construction 1996-2003. Sana’a, Yemen. Ministry of Education (2004). Preparation of the school construction plans and policies. Ministry of Education (2013). Yemen Education Sector Plan-Mid Term Results Framework 2013-2015.
  7. National Information Center (2018). Law No. (23) for the year 2007 regarding tenders and auctions. https://www.yemen-nic.info/db/laws_ye/detail.php?ID=15594, Jan. 2019.
  8. Ogawa K (2004). Achieving education for all in Yemen: Assessment and curr