Dergiler / Acta Medica Anatolia / 2016 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

Effects of Refractive Errors on Visual Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Sayfa
8–13
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Thus, to achieve accurate results they should be corrected in patients that included in the visual fMRI study.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: The purpose of our study is to evaluate the effects of refractive errors on functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) of visual cortex.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The study included 13 patients with refractive error (group 1) and 30 emetropic volunteers (group 2).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Thus, to achieve accurate results they should be corrected in patients that included in the visual fMRI study.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of our study is to evaluate the effects of refractive errors on functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) of visual cortex. Methods and Materials: We performed a prospective study. The study included 13 patients with refractive error (group 1) and 30 emetropic volunteers (group 2). Group 2 was also subgrouped as 20-32 years old (young) and over 45 years old (old) to analyse accommodation effect. fMRI data were acquired with a block design paradigm with 3 Tesla MR system. In both groups, images initially were acquired in normal refractive state. fMRI was performed again in both groups during refractive error. Activation areas on visual cortex were calculated as square centimeter. Total activated areas on visual cortex was compared between normal refractive state and induced/ uncorrected refractive error. Results: In group 1, activation areas of visual cortex during uncorrected refractive error revealed significantly decrease compared with activation areas during corrected refractive error (p=0.001). In group 2, induced myopia resulted significant decrease in activation areas compared with normal refractive state. Decrease in activation areas were significant both in 2 and 4 diopters (D) of myopia compared with normal refractive state (p=0.003, p<0.001 respectively). Both in young and old subgroup, activation areas were significantly decreased during induced myopia. We revealed no difference between young and old subgroups. Conclusion: The refractive errors have a clear effect on fMRI of visual cortex. Thus, to achieve accurate results they should be corrected in patients that included in the visual fMRI study.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AKÇA, A., ANIK, Y., ALTINTAŞ, Ö., DEMİRCİ, A. (2016). Effects of Refractive Errors on Visual Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Acta Medica Anatolia, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 8–13. https://ajindex.com/articles/142620

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Stippich C, Blatow M, Krakow K. Presurgical Functional MRI in Patients with Brain. In: Stippich C. Clinical Functional MRI. Presurgical functional neuroimaging. Germany:Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007:100 2. Miki A, Liu GT, Faro SH. fMRI of the Visual Pathways. In: Faro SH, Mohamed FB, eds. Functional MRI. Basic Principles and Clinicals Aplications. China. Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006:342-343 3. Young TL. Molecular genetics of human myopia: an update. Optom Vis Sci. 2009 Jan
  2. 86(1):E8-E22. 4. Ganesan S, Raman R, Reddy S, Krishnan T, Kulothungan V, Sharma T. Prevalence of myopia and its association with diabetic retinopathy in subjects with type II diabetes mellitus: A population-based study. Oman J Ophthalmol. 2012 May-Aug
  3. 5(2): 91–96. 5. Donahue SP. Presbyopia and Loss of Accomodation. In: Yanoff M, Duker JS, Ophthalmology. [2 nd ed.]. Spain:Mosby, 2004:1371 6. Lawan A, Okpo E, Philips E. Refractive errors in presbyopic patients in Kano, Nigeria. Ann Afr Med. 2014 Jan-Mar
  4. 13(1):21-4. 7. Stippich C. Introduction to Presurgical Functional MRI. In: Stippich C. Clinical Functional MRI. Presurgical functional neuroimaging. Germany:Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007:1-4 8. Li W, Wait SD, Ogg RJ, Scoggins MA, Zou P, Wheless J, et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of the visual cortex performed in children under sedation to assist in presurgical planning. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2013
  5. 6 9. Schulder M, Holodny A, Liu WC, Gray A, Lange G, Carmel PW. Functional magnetic resonance imageguided surgery of tumors in or near the primary visual cortex. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1999
  6. 6 10. Gareau PJ, Gati JS, Menon RS, Lee D, Rice G, Mitchell JR, et al. Reduced visual evoked responses in multiple sclerosis patients with optic neuritis: comparison of functional magnetic resonance imaging and visual evoked potentials. Mult Scler 1999
  7. 4 11. Rombouts SA, Lazeron RH, Scheltens P, Uitdehaag BM, Sprenger M, Valk J, et al. Visual activation patterns in patients with optic neuritis: an fMRI pilot study. Neurology 1998
  8. 9 12. Zou P, Mulhern RK, Butler RW, Li CS, Langston JW, Ogg RJ. BOLD responses to visual stimulation in survivors of childhood cancer. Neuroimage 2005
  9. 9 13. Elbel GK, Kaufmann C, Schaefers S, Buser A, Auer DP. Refractive anomalies and visual activation in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI): a versatile and low-cost MR-compatible device to correct a potential confound. J Magn Reson Imaging 200