KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society Section B: Chemical Engineering / 2019 / Volume: 2 Issue: 2

EFFECT OF MOS2 DOPED CONDUCTING POLYMERS TO CORROSION OF MILD STEEL

Abdurrahman Asan(HITIT UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-1010-3981
Gülden Asan(HITIT UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-6075-159X
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2019-11-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Better protection of PPy than PANI can be explained by the fact that the oxidation potential of pyrrole (0.6 V) is lower than the aniline oxidation potential.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:One of the most common ways of protecting metals from corrosion is to form a film on metal surfaces or to coat them with suitable materials.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this study, the effect of polypyrrole (PPy), polyaniline (PANI) and MoS2 doped PPy and PANI coatings on the corrosion rate of steel was investigated.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Better protection of PPy than PANI can be explained by the fact that the oxidation potential of pyrrole (0.6 V) is lower than the aniline oxidation potential.
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Corrosion · conducting polymers · MoS2

Abstract

One of the most common ways of protecting metals from corrosion is to form a film on metal surfaces or to coat them with suitable materials. Thus, metals are protected from corrosive components in their environment. However, in the case of openings at the micro level that may occur in the formation of the coating or in case of scratches and similar openings that may occur after the coating, water and air will reach the metal surface and initiate corrosion. In this study, the effect of polypyrrole (PPy), polyaniline (PANI) and MoS2 doped PPy and PANI coatings on the corrosion rate of steel was investigated. Corrosion resistance of these coatings was determined by measuring corrosion rates by Tafel Polarization method in 0.1 M NaCl medium. Because of the experiments, it was determined that these homogeneous and adhering coatings were effective against corrosion. The best protection against corrosion was found as 96.7%, 89.0%, 69.5% and 45.2% for PPy + MoS2, PPy, PANI + MoS2 and PANI coatings, respectively. MoS2 additive yielded positive results for both coatings. Better protection of PPy than PANI can be explained by the fact that the oxidation potential of pyrrole (0.6 V) is lower than the aniline oxidation potential.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Asan, A., Asan, G. (2019). EFFECT OF MOS2 DOPED CONDUCTING POLYMERS TO CORROSION OF MILD STEEL. Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society Section B: Chemical Engineering, Volume: 2 Issue: 2. https://ajindex.com/articles/1426198

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (16)

  1. Cost of corrosion in the USA. Anti-Corros Method M. 2000;47(3):141-.
  2. Biezma MV, San Cristobal JR. Methodology to study cost of corrosion. Corros Eng Sci Techn. 2005;40(4):344-52.
  3. Bhaskaran R, Palaniswamy N, Rengaswamy NS, Jayachandran M. A review of differing approaches used to estimate the cost of corrosion (and their relevance in the development of modern corrosion prevention and control strategies). Anti-Corros Method M. 2005;52(1):29-41.
  4. Abed KM, Pynn CR. Effect of Volatile Corrosion Inhibitors on Cathodic Protection. Mater Performance. 2018;57(12):24-9.
  5. Al-Amiery AA, Ahmed MHO, Abdullah TA, Gaaz TS, Kadhum AAH. Electrochemical studies of novel corrosion inhibitor for mild steel in 1 M hydrochloric acid. Results Phys. 2018;9:978-81.
  6. Bandeira MCE, Prochnow FD, Costa I, Franco CV. Corrosion resistance of Nd-Fe-B magnets coated with polypyrrole films. Mater Sci Forum. 2006;530-531:111-+.
  7. Riviere JP, Delafond J, Misaelides P, Noli F. Corrosion protection of an AISI 321 stainless steel by SIC coatings. Surf Coat Tech. 1998;100(1-3):243-6.
  8. DeBerry DW. Modification of the electrochemical and corrosion behavior of stainless steels with an electroactive coating. J Electrochem Soc. 1985;132(5):1022-6.
  9. Fenelon AM, Breslin CB. The electrochemical synthesis of polypyrrole at a copper electrode: corrosion protection properties. Electrochim Acta. 2002;47(28):4467-76.
  10. Asan A, Kabasakaloglu M. Electrochemical and corrosion behaviors of mild steel coated with polypyrrole. Mater Sci+. 2003;39(5):643-51.
  11. Attarzadeh N, Raeissi K, Golozar MA. Effect of saccharin addition on the corrosion resistance of polypyrrole coatings. Prog Org Coat. 2008;63(2):167-74.
  12. Armelin E, Meneguzzi A, Ferreira CA, Aleman C. Polyaniline, polypyrrole and poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) as additives of organic coatings to prevent corrosion. Surf Coat Tech. 2009;203(24):3763-9.
  13. Anicai L, Florea A, Buda M, Visan T. Polypyrrole Films Doped with Phosphomolybdate Anions on Al Surfaces - Formation and Corrosion Protection Characterisation. Z Phys Chem. 2013;227(8):1121-41.
  14. Aravindan N, Sangaranarayanan MV. Influence of solvent composition on the anti-corrosion performance of copper-polypyrrole (Cu-PPy) coated 304 stainless steel. Prog Org Coat. 2016;95:38-45.
  15. Arabzadeh H, Shahidi M, Foroughi MM. Electrodeposited polypyrrole coatings on mild steel: Modeling the EIS data with a new equivalent circuit and the influence of scan rate and cycle number on the corrosion protection. J Electroanal Chem. 2017;807:162-73.
  16. Balaskas AC, Kartsonakis IA, Kordas G, Cabral AM, Morais PJ. Influence of the doping agent on the corrosion protection properties of polypyrrole grown on aluminium alloy 2024-T3. Prog Org Coat. 2011;71(2):181-7.