Dergiler / Bogazici Journal: Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies / 2017 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2

Trade Policies, Investment Climate, and Export Performance

Ticaret Politikaları, Yatırım Ortamı ve İhracat Performansı

Sayfa
21–48
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Hence, policies that improve the investment climate have a greater benefit for export sales of countries with lower foreign market access.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:International trade is a significant source of dispersion in income levels and growth.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Although trade liberalization policies during the past 60 years has led to an almost 30- fold growth in the volume of international trade, the increase has been unequal among countries.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Hence, policies that improve the investment climate have a greater benefit for export sales of countries with lower foreign market access.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

International trade is a significant source of dispersion in income levels and growth. Although trade liberalization policies during the past 60 years has led to an almost 30- fold growth in the volume of international trade, the increase has been unequal among countries. This study investigates how improvements in the investment climate relate to increased export performances of countries. It shows that improvements in regulatory quality, customs efficiency, quality of infrastructure, and access to finance are associated with the competitiveness of firms in international markets. Furthermore, it shows that countries that are relatively more constrained in accessing to foreign markets benefit more from improvements in investment climate. Hence, policies that improve the investment climate have a greater benefit for export sales of countries with lower foreign market access.

Abstract

Uluslararası ticaret gelir seviyelerinde ve büyümede ülkelerin farklı performans göstermelerinde önemli bir etkendir. Geçtiğimiz 60 yıl boyunca ticareti serbestleştiren politikalar global ticaret hacmini 30 kat arttırmış olsa da, bu artış ülkeler arasında büyük farklar göstermektedir. Bu çalışma, yatırım ortamındaki iyileşmelerin ülke ihracat performansları ile nasıl ilişkilendiğini incelemektedir. Çalışmada, düzenleyici kanunların kalitesi, gümrüklerin verimliliği, altyapı kalitesi, finansman kaynaklarına kolay erişim gibi yatırım ortamını iyileştirecek politikaların firmaların uluslararası piyasalarda rekabet gücü ile nasıl ilişkilendiği gösterilmektedir. Bu tür yatırım ortamını iyileştiren politikalar uluslararası piyasalara erişimde güçlük çeken ülkelerde ihracat gelirlerine nispi olarak daha fazla katkı sağlamaktadır.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ŞEKER, M. (2017). Trade Policies, Investment Climate, and Export Performance. Bogazici Journal: Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2, 21–48. https://ajindex.com/articles/142118

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Wilson, J.S., Mann, C.L., and Otsuki, T. (2003). “Trade Facilitation, and Economic Development: A New Approach to Quantifying the Impact,” The World Bank Economic Review, 17(3): 367-389.
  2. Wacziarg, R. and Welch, K.H. (2008), “Trade Liberalization and Growth: The New Evidence,” The World Bank Economic Review, 22(2): 187-231. ------, (2002b). Trade and Development Report. United Nations, Geneva. UNCTAD (2002a). World Investment Report. United Nations, Geneva. Şeker, M. (2012). “Importing, Exporting, and Innovation in Developing Countries,” Review of International Economics, 20(2): 299-314.
  3. Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A., and Trebbi, F. (2004). “Institutional Rule: The Primacy of Institutions over Geography and Integration in Economic Development,” Journal of Economic Growth, 9(2): 131-165.
  4. Rodrik, D. (1998). “Trade Policy and Economic Performance in Sub-Saharan Africa,” NBER Working Paper, No.6562. Francisco, R. and Rodrik, D. (2000). “Trade Policy and Economic Growth: A Skeptic’s Guide to the Cross-national Evidence,” Macroeconomics Annual, NBER and MIT Press.
  5. Redding, S. and Venables, A.J. (2003). “Geography and Export Performance: External Market Access and Internal Supply Capacity,” NBER Working Paper 9637, NBER. North, D. (1990).
  6. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  7. Morrissey, O. (2005). “Imports and Implementation: Neglected Aspects of Trade in the Report of the Commission for Africa,” Journal of Development Studies, 41(4): 1133-1153.
  8. Limao, N. and Venables, A.J. (2001). “Infrastructure, Geographical Disadvantage, Transport Costs, and Trade,” The World Bank Economic Review, 15(3): 451-479.
  9. Kee, H.L., Nicita, A., and Olarreag M. (2009). “Estimating Trade Restrictiveness Indices,” Economic Journal, 119: 172-199.
  10. Kaufman, D., Kraay, A., and Mastruzzi, M. (2009). “Governance Matters VIII Aggregate and Individual Governance Indicators 1996-2008,” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4978. Kasahara, H. and Rodrigue, J. (2008). “Does the Use of Imported Intermediates Increase Productivity? Plant Level Evidence,” Journal of Development Economics, 87: 106-118.
  11. Iwanow, T. and Kirkpatrick, C. (2009). “Trade Facilitation and Manufacturing Exports: Is Africa Different?” World Development, 37(6): 1039-1050.
  12. Hoekman, B. and Nicita, A. (2011). “Trade Policy, Trade Costs, and Developing Country Trade,” World Development, 39(12): 2069-2079.
  13. Head, K. (2003). “Gravity for Beginners,” Mimeo University of Britis