Dergiler / BEYOGLU EYE JOURNAL / 2020 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

Results of Callisto Eye System in Toric Intraocular Lens Alignment

Sayfa
1–4
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: The Callisto eye image-guided, markerless system successfully provided assistance in precisely positioning the toric IOL.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: This study was an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Callisto eye image-guided, markerless system (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany) in toric intraocular lens (IOL) positioning.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Preoperatively, reference image registration was performed with the IOLMaster 700 biometer (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany) and transferred to the Callisto eye system, which was used in conjunction with an Opmi Lumera 700 microscope (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: The Callisto eye image-guided, markerless system successfully provided assistance in precisely positioning the toric IOL.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objectives: This study was an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Callisto eye image-guided, markerless system (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany) in toric intraocular lens (IOL) positioning. Methods: The results of a novel, markerless, alignment system used for IOL positioning were analyzed in this retrospective study. Preoperatively, reference image registration was performed with the IOLMaster 700 biometer (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany) and transferred to the Callisto eye system, which was used in conjunction with an Opmi Lumera 700 microscope (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany). Using the Callisto Z Align technology, a toric IOL was aligned precisely with the steep axis. One day after surgery, the pupil was fully dilated and a thin slit was placed on the marker of the toric IOL and the angle was measured using an axis calculator smartphone application. The degree of the measured angle and the preoperatively determined angle were compared. Results: Sixty eyes of 46 patients were included. The difference in the absolute angle between the intended and the postoperative (at day 1) axes was a mean of 2.71±1.64°. Conclusion: The Callisto eye image-guided, markerless system successfully provided assistance in precisely positioning the toric IOL.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KÖSE, B., ALBAYRAK, S. (2020). Results of Callisto Eye System in Toric Intraocular Lens Alignment. BEYOGLU EYE JOURNAL, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 1–4. https://ajindex.com/articles/142057

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Gökçe SE, Ayar O, Özmen MC, Yazgan S, Akdemir MO, Koç M. The Results of Toric Intraocular Lens Implantation in Cataract Patients with Preexistıng Corneal Astigmatism. Journal of Glaucoma-Cataract 2015;10;125–8
  2. Kılıç İ, Akova YA, Akman A, Eğrilmez S. The Results of Phacoemulsification and Toric Intraocular Lens Implantation in Patients with High Astigmatism and Cataract. [Article in Turkish] Turk J Ophthalmol 2012;42:116–9
  3. Yüce B, Köse B, Yılmaz SG, Eğrilmez S. The Results of Toric Intraocular Lens Implantation in Cases with Cataract and High Astigmatism. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci 2013;33:1224–30
  4. Felipe A, Artigas JM, Díez-Ajenjo A, García-Domene C, Alcocer P. Residual astigmatism produced by toric intraocular lens rotation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011;37:1895–901
  5. Popp N, Hirnschall N, Maedel S, Findl O. Evaluation of 4 corneal astigmatic marking methods. J Cataract Refract Surg 2012;38:2094–9
  6. Visser N, Bauer NJ, Nuijts RM. Toric intraocular lenses: historical overview patient selection, IOL calculation, surgical techniques, clinical outcomes, and complications. J Cataract Refract Surg 2013;39:624–37
  7. Garzón N, Poyales F, de Zárate BO, Ruiz-García JL, Quiroga JA. Evaluation of rotation and visual outcomes after implantation of monofocal and multi- focal toric intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg 2015;31:90–7
  8. Solomon JD, Ladas J. outcomes: computer-assisted registration versus intraoperative aberrometry. J Cataract Refract Surg 2017;43:498–504
  9. Carey PJ, Leccisotti A, McGilligan VE, Goodall EA, Moore CB. Assessment of toric intraocular lens alignment by a refractive power/corneal analyzer system and slitlamp observation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010;36:222–9
  10. Elhofi AH, Helaly HA. Comparison between digital and manual marking of toric intraocular lenses: a randomized trial. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015;94:e1618
  11. Montes de Oca I, Kim EJ, Wang L, Weikert MP, Khandelwal SS, Al-Mohtaseb Z, et al. Accuracy of toric intraocular lens axis alignment using a 3-dimensional computer-guided visualization system. J Cataract Refract Surg 2016;42:550–5
  12. Webers VSC, Bauer NJC, Visser N, Berendschot TTJM, van den Biggelaar FJHM, Nuijts RMMA. Image-guided system versus manual marking for toric intraocular lens alignment in cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2017;43:781–8
  13. Woodcock MG, Lehmann R, Cionni RJ, Breen M, Scott MC. Intraoperative aberrometry versus standard preoperative biometry and a toric IOLcalculator for bil