KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Journal of advances in vetbio science and techniques / 2026 / Issue: 3

Global research trends on antimicrobial resistance in farm animals: a bibliometric analysis

Ahmet Cihat Öner(VAN YÜZÜNCÜ YIL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, VETERİNER FAKÜLTESİ, VETERİNER PR.)0000-0001-6614-4347
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2026-10-20
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This bibliometric analysis provides a foundational reference for identifying research gaps and setting future priorities.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is considered one of the foremost global public health threats affecting both human and animal health.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:A systematic search of the Web of Science (WOS) database was conducted using the keywords "antimicrobial resistance", "antibiotic resistance", "AMR" and "livestock", covering 1980–2024.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This bibliometric analysis provides a foundational reference for identifying research gaps and setting future priorities.
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:2024 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:antimicrobial resistance · antibiotic resistance · bibliometric analysis

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is considered one of the foremost global public health threats affecting both human and animal health. The intensive use of antibiotics in farm animals promotes the selection and dissemination of resistance genes across diverse reservoirs. This study characterised worldwide scientific publication patterns on AMR in farm animals using bibliometric methods. A systematic search of the Web of Science (WOS) database was conducted using the keywords "antimicrobial resistance", "antibiotic resistance", "AMR" and "livestock", covering 1980–2024. Of 850 initially retrieved records, 835 articles met inclusion criteria and were analysed using VOSviewer (v1.6.20) and Bibliometrix/Biblioshiny (R v4.2.2). The 835 articles received 18,142 citations, yielding a mean citation rate of 29.98 per article and an H-index of 74. Publications and citations increased markedly from 2015 onwards. A total of 87.67% of articles were indexed in the Science Citation Index Expanded. Microbiology (26.47%), veterinary sciences (24.79%) and infectious diseases (21.80%) were the leading research categories. The USA (17.96%), England (14.13%) and China (9.94%) were the most productive countries, while CGIAR (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) and the International Livestock Research Institute led at the institutional level. Global scientific output on AMR in farm animals has accelerated considerably over the past decade. The convergence of microbiology, veterinary sciences and public health underscores the need for interdisciplinary, One Health approaches. This bibliometric analysis provides a foundational reference for identifying research gaps and setting future priorities.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Öner, A. C. (2026). Global research trends on antimicrobial resistance in farm animals: a bibliometric analysis. Journal of advances in vetbio science and techniques, Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.31797/vetbio.1973840

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (19)

  1. Ardakani, Z., Canali, M., Aragrande, M., Tomassone, L., Simoes, M., Balzani, A., & Beber, C. L. (2023). Evaluating the contribution of antimicrobial use in farmed animals to global antimicrobial resistance in humans. One Health, 17, 100647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2023.100647
  2. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
  3. Dimuccio, M. M., Conforti, V., Celentano, F. E., Circella, E., Salvaggiulo, A., Bozzo, G., & Corrente, M. (2026). Regulation of antibiotic use in livestock: European and international strategies to prevent and control antimicrobial resistance and ensure animal welfare. Antibiotics, 15(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics15010067
  4. European Environment Agency (EEA). (2024). Veterinary antimicrobials in Europe's environment: a One Health perspective. Copenhagen: EEA.
  5. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (2021). FAO Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance 2021–2025. Rome: FAO.
  6. Hickman, R. A., Leangapichart, T., Lunha, K., Jiwakanon, J., Angkititrakul, S., Magnusson, U., Sunde, M., & Järhult, J. D. (2021). Exploring the antibiotic resistance burden in livestock, livestock handlers and their non-livestock handling contacts: a One Health perspective. Frontiers in Microbiology, 12, 651461. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.651461
  7. IHME AMR Collaborators. (2024). Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance 1990–2021: a systematic analysis with forecasts to 2050. The Lancet, 404(10459), 1199–1226. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01867-1
  8. Laxminarayan, R., Duse, A., Wattal, C., Zaidi, A. K. M., Wertheim, H. F. L., Sumpradit, N., & Cars, O. (2013). Antibiotic resistance—the need for global solutions. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 13(12), 1057–1098. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70318-9
  9. Mulchandani, R., Wang, Y., Gilbert, M., & Van Boeckel, T. P. (2023). Global trends in antimicrobial use in food-producing animals: 2020 to 2030. PLOS Global Public Health, 3(2), e0001305. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001305
  10. Murray, C. J., Ikuta, K. S., Sharara, F., Swetschinski, L., Robles Aguilar, G., Gray, A., & Naghavi, M. (2022). Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. The Lancet, 399(10325), 629–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02724-0
  11. Sweileh, W. M. (2021). Global research activity on antimicrobial resistance in food-producing animals. Archives of Public Health, 79(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-021-00572-w
  12. Torres, R. T., Carvalho, J., Cunha, M. V., Serrano, E., Palmeira, J. D., & Fonseca, C. (2020). Temporal and geographical research trends of antimicrobial resistance in wildlife - A bibliometric analysis. One Health, 11, 100198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2020.100198
  13. Van Boeckel, T. P., Brower, C., Gilbert, M., Grenfell, B. T., Levin, S. A., Robinson, T. P., Teillant, A., & Laxminarayan, R. (2015). Global trends in antimicrobial use in food animals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(18), 5649–5654. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1503141112
  14. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2023). VOSviewer manual for VOSviewer version 1.6.20. Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS), Leiden University. https://www.vosviewer.com/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.20.pdf
  15. Woolhouse, M., Ward, M., van Bunnik, B., & Farrar, J. (2015). Antimicrobial resistance in humans, livestock and the wider environment. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 370(1670), 20140083. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0083
  16. World Health Organization. (2019). No time to wait: Securing the future from drug-resistant infections. Report to the Secretary-General of the United Nations. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/documents/no-time-to-wait-securing-the-future-from-drug-resistant-infections-en.pdf
  17. World Health Organization (WHO). (2019). No time to wait: securing the future from drug-resistant infections. Report to the Secretary-General of the United Nations. Geneva: WHO. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/documents/no-time-to-wait-securing-the-future-from-drug-resistant-infections-en.pdf
  18. World Organization for Animal Health. (2023). Annual report on antimicrobial agents intended for use in animals: 7th report. Paris, France: World Organization for Animal Health. https://www.woah.org/app/uploads/2023/10/a-seventh-annual-report-amu.pdf
  19. Zhao, X., Yang, J., & Ju, Z. (2023). Extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing bacteria in animals: a review. Antibiotics, 12(4), 661. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12040661