Dergiler / Aquatic Research / 2020 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3

Effects of intermittent feeding regimes on growth performance and economic benefits of Amur catfish (Silurus asotus)

Sayfa
167–176
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This shows that every day feeding to satiation is the best feeding regime to be adopted for economic benefits of rearing Amur catfish.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:A study was conducted to determine the growth performance and economic viability of culturing Amur Catfish (Silurus asotus) using four different feeding regimes: Every-day feeding (EDF), Every two-days feeding (ETDF), Tertian feeding (TF) and Quartan feeding (QF) for 65 days.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Twenty fingerlings of sizes between 2-3 grams each were randomly distributed in 12 glass aquaria and assigned to each of the feeding regime in triplicates.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This shows that every day feeding to satiation is the best feeding regime to be adopted for economic benefits of rearing Amur catfish.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

A study was conducted to determine the growth performance and economic viability of culturing Amur Catfish (Silurus asotus) using four different feeding regimes: Every-day feeding (EDF), Every two-days feeding (ETDF), Tertian feeding (TF) and Quartan feeding (QF) for 65 days. Twenty fingerlings of sizes between 2-3 grams each were randomly distributed in 12 glass aquaria and assigned to each of the feeding regime in triplicates. Fish were fed on commercial feed (Woosung feed) containing 50% crude protein. Highest specific growth rates (SGR) (5.15 ±0.06%) was recorded in EDF with significance differences in all treatments (P ˃ 0.05). Feed conversion ratio (FCR) was significantly lower in TF (P ˂ 0.05) while survival rate ranged from 83.33% to 96.67% and was not significantly different among the treatments (P > 0.05). The length-weight relationship (LWR) analysis indicated that the regression slope b values were not significantly different (P > 0.05) among the treatments. Partial enterprise budget analysis of S. asotus using different feeding regimes indicated that net returns above total costs were significantly higher in EDF (P ˂ 0.05). This shows that every day feeding to satiation is the best feeding regime to be adopted for economic benefits of rearing Amur catfish.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

HOLEH, G. M., APPENTENG, P., OPİYO, M. A., PARK, J., BROWN, C. L. (2020). Effects of intermittent feeding regimes on growth performance and economic benefits of Amur catfish (Silurus asotus). Aquatic Research, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3, 167–176. https://ajindex.com/articles/141945

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Abdel-Tawwab, M., Ahmad, M.H. (2009). Effect of dietary protein regime during the growing period on growth performance, feed utilization and whole-body chemical composition of Nile Tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus (L.). Aquaculture Research, 40(13), 1532-1537. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.02254.x
  2. Abou-Zied, R. M. (2015). Effect of diet extruded type on growth performance, feed utilization and economic efficiency of Nile tilapia in commercial farms. Egyptian Journal of Nutrition and Feeds, 18(1), 143-150.
  3. Ali, M. Z., Jauncey, K. (2004). Evaluation of mixed feeding schedules with respect to compensatory growth and body composition in African catfish Clarias gariepinus. Aquaculture Nutrition, 10(1). 1365-2095. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2095.2003.00278.x
  4. Anderson, R., Neumann, R. M. (1996).
  5. Length, Weight and Associated Structural Indices. In: B.R. Murphy, & D.W. Willis, (Eds), Fisheries techniques, 2nd edition. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland 447-482.
  6. Bailey, D.S., Hargreaves, J.A., Rakocy, J.E. (1992). Enterprise budget analysis of three stocking densities of caged Florida red tilapia. Proc. Gulf Carib. Fish. Biswal, G., Jena, J.K., Singh, S.K., Muduli, H.K. (2006). Effect of feeding frequency on growth, survival and feed utilization in fingerlings of Catla catla (Hamilton), Labeo rohita (Hamilton) and Cirrhinus mrigala (Hamilton) in outdoor rearing systems. Aquaculture Research, 37(5), 510-514. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2006.01457.x
  7. Bolivar, R.J., Brown, C.L. (2006). Alternate day feeding strategy for nile tilapia growth out in the phillipines: marginal cost revenue analysis 1. North American Journal of Aquaculture, 68, 192-197. https://doi.org/10.1577/A05-012.1
  8. Boyd, C.E., Tucker, C.S. (1998). Pond Aquaculture Water Quality Management. Kluwer Academic Publishers,
  9. Boston, Massachusetts, USA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5407-3
  10. Brown, C.L., Bolivar, R.B., Jimenez, E.B. (2000). Timing of the onset of supplemental feeeding of Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) in ponds. In: Fitzsimmons K, Filho JC, editors. Tilapia Aquaculture in the 21st Century. Proceedings from the 5th Int'l Symposium on Tilapia Aquaculture. Brazil, Rio de Janeiro, 2000. p. 682, 237-240.
  11. Brown, C.L., Bolivar, B., Jimenez, E.B. (2004). Philippine studies support moderate feeding in tilapia. Global Aquaculture Alliance Advocate 7,4 p70. Bulut M., Yigit M., Ergun S., Kesbic O.S., Acar U., Gultepe N., Karga M., Yilmaz S., Guroy D. (2014). Evaluation o