Dergiler / Aquatic Research / 2020 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3

Macroinvertebrates in a high Andean wetland (Chalhuanca) of southern Peru during the dry and wet season

Sayfa
155–166
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

By type of environment, 25 families were registered for bofedal and 26 for the river, where exclusive families were presented for found environments 05 exclusive families of bofedal (Chydoridae, Coenagrionidae, Ilyocryptidae, Lumbriculidae, Dytiscidae), and 05 exclusive families of river (Gripopterygidae, Hydrobiosidae, Hydrophilidae, Leptoceridae, Saldidae).

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Macroinvertebrates of the Chalhuanca high Andean wetland (bofedal) is presented, which presents two aquatic environments, river and water pools within bofedal vegetation.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This wetland is located in the district of Yanque (Caylloma, Arequipa) at 4300 meters, in southern Peru.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:By type of environment, 25 families were registered for bofedal and 26 for the river, where exclusive families were presented for found environments 05 exclusive families of bofedal (Chydoridae, Coenagrionidae, Ilyocryptidae, Lumbriculidae, Dytiscidae), and 05 exclusive families of river (Gripopterygidae, Hydrobiosidae, Hydrophilidae, Leptoceridae, Saldidae).
🔬Tür:Deneysel Tarla Denemesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Macroinvertebrates of the Chalhuanca high Andean wetland (bofedal) is presented, which presents two aquatic environments, river and water pools within bofedal vegetation. This wetland is located in the district of Yanque (Caylloma, Arequipa) at 4300 meters, in southern Peru. Aquatic macroinvertebrates in wetlands such as these have been sparsely studied in Peru and other localities, especially in the southern region, which is added to their taxonomic complexity for identification. For this bofedal 32 families were identified, distributed in 21 orders and 12 classes. The richest groups were Diptera, Coleoptera, Trichoptera and Anomopoda. The other groups presented only one family. By type of environment, 25 families were registered for bofedal and 26 for the river, where exclusive families were presented for found environments 05 exclusive families of bofedal (Chydoridae, Coenagrionidae, Ilyocryptidae, Lumbriculidae, Dytiscidae), and 05 exclusive families of river (Gripopterygidae, Hydrobiosidae, Hydrophilidae, Leptoceridae, Saldidae).

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

FERNANDEZ, C. R. L., PAUCA, G. A., PAREDES, L. N. V., TURPO, J. D. P. Q., BENAVİDES, J. F. V. (2020). Macroinvertebrates in a high Andean wetland (Chalhuanca) of southern Peru during the dry and wet season. Aquatic Research, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3, 155–166. https://ajindex.com/articles/141944

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Acosta, R., Ríos-Touma, B., Rieradevall, M., Prat, N. (2009). Propuesta de un protocolo de evaluación de la calidad ecológica de ríos Andinos (C.E.R.A) y su aplicación en dos cuencas en Ecuador y Perú. Limnetica, 28(1), 35-64.
  2. Allan, J.D. (2004). Landscape and Riverscapes: The influence of land use on stream ecosystems. Annual Reviews Ecological Systems, 35, 257-284. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.120202.110122
  3. Andrade, G.I., Franco, L., Delgado, J. (2012). Barriers to Sustainable Adaptation of Lake Fúque-ne, Colombia. In: Lake Sustainability, eds. C. A. Brebbia y S. E. Jorgense. WIT Press, 224 p. ISBN: 1845646681 Ansaloni, I., Prevedelli, D., Ruocco, M., Simonini, R. (2016). Checklist of benthic macroinvertebrates of the Lago Pratignano (northern Apennines, Italy): an extremely rich ecosystem. Check List, 12(1), 182-186. https://doi.org/10.15560/12.1.1821
  4. Armitage, P.D., Moss, D., Furse, M.T. (1983). The performance of a new biological water quality score system based on macroinvertebrates over a wide range of umpollutes runnigwaters sites. Water Research, 17, 33-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(83)90188-4
  5. Bonada, N., Prat, N., Resh, V.H., Statzner, B. (2006). Development in aquatic insect biomonitoring: a comparative analysis of recent approaches. Annual Review of Entomology, 51, 495-523. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.51.110104.151124
  6. Borkent, A., Spinelli, G.R. (2007). Neotropical Ceratopogonidae (Diptera: Insecta), In: J. Adis, J.R. Arias, G. RuedaDelgado & K.M. Wantzen (Eds.). Aquatic Biodiversity in Latin America (p. 197-198),
  7. Pensoft, Sofia, Moscow. ISBN: 9789546423016 Bunn, A.J., Davies, P.M. (2000). Biological processes in running waters and their implications for the assessment of ecological integrity. Hydrobiologia, 422/423, 461-470. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4164-2_5
  8. Canchapoma, K., Casas, K., Palacin, A., Rojas, D., Vargas, I. (2016). La biodiversidad de macroinvertebrados como indicadores de calidad de agua en los ríos de Junín. Revista Ingenium, 1(2), 2519-1403. https://doi.org/10.18259/ing.2016012
  9. Coaguila, L., Machaca, J., Lizarraga, J., Ocsa, E., Quispe, F., Zeballos, H. (2010). Bofedales en la Reserva Nacional de Salinas y Aguada Blanca. In:Diversidad biológica de la Reserva Nacional de Salinas y Aguada Blanca (p. 115-129).
  10. Lima, Peru, Desco, Profonanpe, Sernanp. ISBN: 9786124043093 Coronel, J.S., de la Barra, N., Aguilera, N. (2009). Bofedales altoandinas de Bolivia: Vegetacion acuática y factores ambie