KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Anatomy / 2019 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1

Radiographic evaluation of bone maturations in children and adolescents living in Erzurum using Greulich-Pyle method

Cengiz ÖZTÜRK
Mete ÖZDİKİCİ
Samih DİYARBAIR
Dergi
Anatomy
Sayfa
21–26
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

However, in certain age groups for both genders, the GP method significantly underestimated skeletal age.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: Bone age (BA) is used in age determination for a number of medico-legal reasons.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: Hand and wrist radiographs of 507 individuals (243 boys and 264 girls) aged between 7–19 years were evaluated and the BA was estimated by a radiologist using the GP method.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:However, in certain age groups for both genders, the GP method significantly underestimated skeletal age.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:adolescent · bone age · bone maturation

Abstract

Objectives: Bone age (BA) is used in age determination for a number of medico-legal reasons. One of the most commonly used radiographic methods in BA assessment is to compare hand-wrist radiographs with a standard reference. In this study, Greulich-Pyle (GP) method was used to determine the bone maturation values of a population of children and adolescents living in the city of Erzurum, Turkey. Methods: Hand and wrist radiographs of 507 individuals (243 boys and 264 girls) aged between 7–19 years were evaluated and the BA was estimated by a radiologist using the GP method. Difference between estimated BA and chronological age (CA) was analyzed. Results: In boys, except for the ages of 12,13 and 17 years, BA was significantly lower than the chronological age. In girls, BA was significantly lower than CA at 7, 8, 18 and 19 years of age, but not statistically different in the other ages. Conclusion: According to the GP atlas, it is suggested that many factors including high altitude, cold climate, environment, nutrition, genetics, ethnics and socio-economic diversities might cause differences between BA and CA. Our results obtained in this study suggest that this method can guide the determination of bone age in children living in Erzurum, Turkey. However, in certain age groups for both genders, the GP method significantly underestimated skeletal age.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÖZTÜRK, C., ÖZDİKİCİ, M., DİYARBAIR, S. (2019). Radiographic evaluation of bone maturations in children and adolescents living in Erzurum using Greulich-Pyle method. Anatomy, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1, 21–26. https://ajindex.com/articles/141798

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (17)

  1. Greulich WW, Pyle SI. Radiographic atlas of skeletal development of the hand and wrist. 2nd ed. Stanford (CA): Stanford University Press; 1959. p. 50–250
  2. The Turkish Civil Code Law No. 4721. Official Gazette, Date: 8.12.2001, Article 11
  3. Gardner E, Gray DJ, O’Rahilly R. Anatomy. Philadelphia (PA): WB Saunders; 1969. pp. 279–83
  4. Levine E. The contributions of the carpal bones and the epiphyseal centres of the hand to the assessment of skeletal maturity. Hum Biol 1972;44:317–27
  5. Marshall WA, Ashcroft MT, Bryan G. Skeletal maturation of the hand and wrist in Jamaican children. Hum Biol 1970;42:419–35
  6. Jiménez-Castellanos J, Carmona A, Catalina-Herrera CJ, Viñuales M. Skeletal maturation of wrist and hand ossification centers in normal Spanish boys and girls: a study using the Greulich-Pyle method. Acta Anat 1996;155:206–11
  7. Lejarraga H, Guimarey L, Orazi V. Skeletal maturity of the hand and wrist of healthy Argentinian children aged 4–12 years, assessed by the TWII method. Ann Hum Biol 1997;24:257–61
  8. Zhen OY, Baolin L. Skeletal maturity of the hand and wrist in Chinese school children in Harbin assessed by the TW2 method. Ann Hum Biol 1986;13:183–7
  9. Melsen B, Wenzel A, Miletic T, Andreasen J. Dental and skeletal maturity in adoptive children: assessments at arrival and after one year in the admitting country. Journal Ann Hum Biol 1986;13:153– 9
  10. Ashizawa K, Asami T, Anzo M, Matsuo N, Matsuoka H, Murata M, Ohtsuki F, Satoh M, Tanaka T, Tatara H, Tsukagoshi K. Standard RUS skeletal maturation of Tokyo children. Ann Hum Biol 1996;23: 457–69
  11. Pawson IG. The effects of high altitudes on child growth and development. Int J Biometeorol 1977;21:171–8
  12. Wells JC. Environmental temperature and human growth in early life. J Theor Biol 2000;204:299–305
  13. Tanner JM, Whitehouse RH, Cameron N, Marshall WA. Assessment of skeletal maturity and prediction of adult height (TW2 method). London: Academic Press; 1975. p. 99
  14. Ahmed ML, Warner JT. TW2 and TW3 bone ages: time to change? Arch Dis Child 2007;92:371–2
  15. Neyzi O. Ertu¤rul C. Koç L. Child health and diseases. [Book in Turkish] Istanbul: Istanbul Faculty of Medicine Foundation & Bayda Publications; 1984. p. 21–4
  16. Takai S, Akiyoshi T. Skeletal maturity of Japanese children in Western Kyushu. Am J Phys Anthropol 1983;62:199–204
  17. Takai S. Smoothed skeletal maturity curve of Japanese children by Tanner-Whitehouse 2 (TW2) method and its application. Kaibogaku Zasshi 1990