Dergiler / İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1

Dezavantajlı Gruplarla Çalışan Psikologların İkincil Travma ve Bilişsel Esneklik Düzeylerinin Sosyodemografik Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi

Examination of Secondary Trauma and Cognitive Flexibility Levels of Psychologists Working with Disadvantaged Groups in Terms of Sociodemographic Variables

Pınar Uygun(T.C. Aile ve Sosyal Hizmetler Bakanlığı)0000-0003-0799-5031
Zekeriya Kökrek(İSTANBUL TİCARET ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İNSAN VE TOPLUM BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ, PSİKOLOJİ BÖLÜMÜ)0000-0003-0689-5952
Sayfa
215–229
Yayın Tarihi
2025-04-21
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Bulgular: Araştırma sonucunda, cinsiyet, yaş, eğitim durumu, gelir düzeyi, çalışılan kurum türü, psikiyatrik rahatsızlık öyküsü, mesleği isteyerek yapma ve çalışılan dezavantajlı grup türü gibi değişkenlerin ikincil travmatik stres ve bilişsel esneklik puanlarında anlamlı bir fark yaratmadığı bulunmuştur.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Amaç: Bu araştırmanın amacı, dezavantajlı gruplarla çalışan psikologların ikincil travmatik stres ve bilişsel esneklik düzeylerini incelemek ve bu değişkenlerin çeşitli demografik ve mesleki özelliklere göre farklılık gösterip göstermediğini değerlendirmektir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Yöntem: Nicel desenle yürütülen araştırmaya, dezavantajlı gruplarla çalışan toplam 165 psikolog katılmıştır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Bulgular: Araştırma sonucunda, cinsiyet, yaş, eğitim durumu, gelir düzeyi, çalışılan kurum türü, psikiyatrik rahatsızlık öyküsü, mesleği isteyerek yapma ve çalışılan dezavantajlı grup türü gibi değişkenlerin ikincil travmatik stres ve bilişsel esneklik puanlarında anlamlı bir fark yaratmadığı bulunmuştur.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Bilişsel Esneklik · Dezavantajlı Gruplar · İkincil Travma

Özet

Amaç: Bu araştırmanın amacı, dezavantajlı gruplarla çalışan psikologların ikincil travmatik stres ve bilişsel esneklik düzeylerini incelemek ve bu değişkenlerin çeşitli demografik ve mesleki özelliklere göre farklılık gösterip göstermediğini değerlendirmektir. Yöntem: Nicel desenle yürütülen araştırmaya, dezavantajlı gruplarla çalışan toplam 165 psikolog katılmıştır. Veri toplamak amacıyla “Sosyodemografik Bilgi Formu”, “İkincil Travmatik Stres Ölçeği” ve “Bilişsel Esneklik Envanteri” kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen veriler çeşitli istatistiksel analiz yöntemleriyle değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular: Araştırma sonucunda, cinsiyet, yaş, eğitim durumu, gelir düzeyi, çalışılan kurum türü, psikiyatrik rahatsızlık öyküsü, mesleği isteyerek yapma ve çalışılan dezavantajlı grup türü gibi değişkenlerin ikincil travmatik stres ve bilişsel esneklik puanlarında anlamlı bir fark yaratmadığı bulunmuştur. Öte yandan, görev süresi ve bireysel travmatik yaşantı öyküsü, ikincil travmatik stres düzeylerinde anlamlı farklılık göstermiştir. Bilişsel esneklik düzeyleri ise yalnızca görev süresine göre anlamlı farklılık göstermiştir. Sonuç: Elde edilen bulgular, dezavantajlı gruplarla çalışan psikologların mesleki dayanıklılığı açısından ikincil travmatik stres ve bilişsel esnekliğin dikkate alınması gerektiğine işaret etmektedir. Bu çerçevede, psikologların iyi oluşlarının desteklenmesi ve etkin müdahale sunabilmeleri adına daha fazla uygulamalı çalışma ve destekleyici programlara ihtiyaç duyulmaktadır.

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to examine the levels of secondary traumatic stress and cognitive flexibility among psychologists working with disadvantaged groups, and to investigate whether these variables differ based on various demographic and professional characteristics. Method: The study was conducted using a quantitative design and included 165 psychologists working with disadvantaged populations. Data were collected through the “Sociodemographic Information Form,” the “Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale,” and the “Cognitive Flexibility Inventory.” The data were analyzed using appropriate statistical methods. Results: Findings indicated that gender, age, education level, income level, type of institution, history of psychiatric disorders, willingness to practice the profession, and the type of disadvantaged group served did not yield significant differences in secondary traumatic stress or cognitive flexibility scores. However, significant differences in secondary traumatic stress levels were observed based on years of professional experience and personal history of traumatic experiences. Cognitive flexibility levels showed significant variation only in relation to professional experience. Conclusion: The findings highlight the importance of addressing secondary traumatic stress and cognitive flexibility to support the well-being and effectiveness of psychologists working with disadvantaged groups. The study suggests a need for further applied research and supportive programs to promote mental resilience in this professional group.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Uygun, P., Kökrek, Z. (2025). Dezavantajlı Gruplarla Çalışan Psikologların İkincil Travma ve Bilişsel Esneklik Düzeylerinin Sosyodemografik Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi. İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1, 215–229. https://ajindex.com/articles/1417435

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (54)

  1. ADAMS, R., BOSCARINO, J., & FIGLEY, C. (2006). Compassion fatigue and psychological distress among social workers: a validation study. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 76(1), 103-108. https://doi.org/10.1037/0002-9432.76.1.103
  2. AMINIHAJIBASHI, S., SKAR, A., & JENSEN, T. (2022). Professional wellbeing and turnover intention among child therapists: a comparison between therapists trained and untrained in trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy. BMC Health Services Research, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08670-3
  3. APPERLY, I. & BUTTERFILL, S. (2009). Do humans have two systems to track beliefs and belief-like states? Psychological Review, 116(4), 953-970. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016923
  4. BECK, C. (2011). Secondary traumatic stress in nurses: a systematic review. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 25(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnu.2010.05.005
  5. BECK, C. (2019). Secondary traumatic stress in maternal-newborn nurses: secondary qualitative analysis. Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, 26(1), 55-64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078390319886358
  6. BEN‐ZİON, Z., FİNE, N., KEYNAN, N., ADMON, R., GREEN, N., HALEVİ, M., & SHALEV, A. (2018). Cognitive flexibility predicts ptsd symptoms: observational and interventional studies. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00477
  7. BRİDE, B. E. (2001). Psychometric properties of the secondary traumatic stress scale. (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). The University of Georgia/Graduate Faculty, Georgia, ABD.
  8. BRİDE, B., ROBİNSON, M., YEGİDİS, B., & FİGLEY, C. (2004). Development and validation of the secondary traumatic stress scale. Research on Social Work Practice, 14(1), 27-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731503254106
  9. CAMPBELL, A., LANDERS, A., & JACKSON, J. (2022). I have to hold it together: trauma in law enforcement couples. Family Relations, 71(4), 1593-1618. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12661
  10. CHEN, J., MASTARONE, G., & DENNESON, L. (2019). It's not easy – impacts of suicide prevention research on study staff. Crisis, 40(3), 151-156. https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000595
  11. CHOI, G. (2016). Secondary traumatic stress and empowerment among social workers working with family violence or sexual assault survivors. Journal of Social Work, 17(3), 358-378. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017316640194
  12. CIEŚLAK, R., ANDERSON, V., BOCK, J., MOORE, B., PETERSON, A., & BENIGHT, C. (2013). Secondary traumatic stress among mental health providers working with the military. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 201(11), 917-925. https://doi.org/10.1097/nmd.0000000000000034
  13. CİEŚLAK, R., SHOJİ, K., LUSZCZYNSKA, A., TAYLOR, S., ROGALA, A., & BENİGHT, C. (2013). Secondary trauma self-efficacy: concept and its measurement. Psychological Assessment, 25(3), 917-928. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032687
  14. COETZEE, S. & KLOPPER, H. (2010). Compassion fatigue within nursing practice: a concept analysis. Nursing and Health Sciences, 12(2), 235-243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2018.2010.00526.x
  15. COHEN, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
  16. COLZATO, L. S., VAN DEN WILDENBERG, W. P., & HOMMEL, B. (2013). Cognitive flexibility in work-related situations: Dual-task studies of executive control. Cognitive psychology, 66(3), 184-202.
  17. Rönnlund, M., Mäntylä, T., & Nilsson, L. G. (2008). The association between cognitive ability and cognitive flexibility is higher for extraverts than introverts. Intelligence, 36(6), 591-601.
  18. DAJANİ, D. & UDDİN, L. (2015). Demystifying cognitive flexibility: implications for clinical and developmental neuroscience. Trends in Neurosciences, 38(9), 571-578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2015.07.003
  19. DENNİS, J. P. & VANDER WAL, J. S. V. (2010). The Cognitive Flexibility Inventory: Instrument development and estimates of reliability and validity. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 34(3), 241–253. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10608-009-9276-
  20. DUFFY, E., AVALOS, G., & DOWLİNG, M. (2015). Secondary traumatic stress among emergency nurses: a cross-sectional study. International Emergency Nursing, 23(2), 53-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ienj.2014.05.001
  21. FOLEY, J. & MASSEY, K. (2020). The ‘cost’ of caring in policing: from burnout to ptsd in police officers in england and wales. The Police Journal Theory Practice and Principles, 94(3), 298-315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032258x20917442
  22. GUROWİEC, P., OGİŃSKA-BULİK, J., MİCHALSKA, P., & KĘDRA, E. (2023). The mediating role of cognitive processing in the relationship between social support and secondary traumatic stress symptoms in healthcare professionals. Archives of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, 25(1), 54-62. https://doi.org/10.12740/app/155143
  23. GÜLÜM, İ. V. & DAĞ, İ. (2012). The Turkish adaptation, validity and reliability study of The Repetitive Thinking Questionnaire and The Cognitive Flexibility Inventory. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry, 13(3), 216-223
  24. HAREL, O., HEMİ, A., & LEVY-GİGİ, E. (2023). The role of cognitive flexibility in moderating the effect of school-related stress exposure. Scientific Reports, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31743-0
  25. HENSEL, J., RUİZ, C., FİNNEY, C., & DEWA, C. (2015). Meta‐analysis of risk factors for secondary traumatic stress in therapeutic work with trauma victims. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 28(2), 83-91. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.21998
  26. HUANG, W., FANG, Y., TAN, X., & ZHAO, J. (2022). Childhood trauma, stressful life events, and depression: exploring the mediating effect of cognitive flexibility. Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001337
  27. IVİCİC, R. & MOTTA, R. (2017). Variables associated with secondary traumatic stress among mental health professionals. Traumatology an International Journal, 23(2), 196-204. https://doi.org/10.1037/trm0000065
  28. KAHİL, A. (2016). Travmatik yaşantıları olan bireylere yardım davranışında bulunan profesyonel ve gönüllülerin ikincil travmatik stres düzeylerinin incelenmesi (Yayımlanmış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Ufuk Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  29. LANDERS, A., DIMITROPOULOS, G., MENDENHALL, T., KENNEDY, A., & ZEMANEK, L. (2019). Backing the blue: trauma in law enforcement spouses and couples. Family Relations, 69(2), 308-319. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12393
  30. LEE, H., BAEK, W., LIM, A., LEE, D., PANG, Y., & KIM, O. (2021). Secondary traumatic stress and compassion satisfaction mediate the association between stress and burnout among korean hospital nurses: a cross-sectional study. BMC Nursing, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00636-w
  31. LEE, H., LEE, M., & JANG, S. (2021). Compassion satisfaction, secondary traumatic stress, and burnout among nurses working in trauma centers: a cross-sectional study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(14), 7228. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147228
  32. LEVIN, A., PUTNEY, H., CRIMMINS, D., & MCGRATH, J. (2021). Secondary traumatic stress, burnout, compassion satisfaction, and perceived organizational trauma readiness in forensic science professionals. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 66(5), 1758-1769. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.14747
  33. MACRITCHIE, V. & LEIBOWITZ, S. (2010). Secondary traumatic stress, level of exposure, empathy and social support in trauma workers. South African Journal of Psychology, 40(2), 149-158. https://doi.org/10.1177/008124631004000204
  34. MAGALHÃES, S., CARNEIRO, L., LIMPO, T., & FILIPE, M. (2020). Executive functions predict literacy and mathematics achievements: the unique contribution of cognitive flexibility in grades 2, 4, and 6. Child Neuropsychology, 26(7), 934-952. https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2020.1740188
  35. MAURYA, R. & DEDIEGO, A. (2023). Exploring the relationship between secondary traumatic stress, professional identity and career factors for counsellors. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 24(1), 199-208. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12630
  36. MERWE, A. & HUNT, X. (2019). Secondary trauma among trauma researchers: lessons from the field. Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy, 11(1), 10-18. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0000414
  37. NEWSOME, J., CLEMMONS, E., FITZHUGH, D., GLUCKMAN, T., CREAMER-HENTE, M., TAMBRALLO, L., & WILDER-KOFIE, T. (2019). Compassion fatigue, euthanasia stress, and their management in laboratory animal research. Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science, 58(3), 289-292. https://doi.org/10.30802/aalas-jaalas-18-000092
  38. OGIŃSKA-BULIK, N. & MICHALSKA, P. (2021). Psychological resilience and secondary traumatic stress in nurses working with terminally ill patients—the mediating role of job burnout. Psychological Services, 18(3), 398-405. https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000421
  39. OGİŃSKA-BULİK, N., GUROWİEC, P., MİCHALSKA, P., & KĘDRA, E. (2021). Prevalence and predictors of secondary traumatic stress symptoms in health care professionals working with trauma victims: a cross-sectional study. Plos One, 16(2), e0247596. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247596
  40. RUHENKAMP, G., DAWSON, C., & LEE, H. (2023). Why self-care? maintaining high job satisfaction among human service professionals. Journal of Student Research, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.47611/jsr.v11i4.1813
  41. SHOJI, K., LESNIEROWSKA, M., SMOKTUNOWICZ, E., BOCK, J., LUSZCZYNSKA, A., BENIGHT, C., & CIEŚLAK, R. (2015). What comes first, job burnout or secondary traumatic stress? findings from two longitudinal studies from the u.s. and poland. Plos One, 10(8), e0136730. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136730
  42. SODEKE-GREGSON, E., HOLTTUM, S., & BILLINGS, J. (2013). Compassion satisfaction, burnout, and secondary traumatic stress in uk therapists who work with adult trauma clients. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.3402/ejpt.v4i0.21869
  43. SPRANG, G., CLARK, J., & WHİTT-WOOSLEY, A. (2007). Compassion fatigue, compassion satisfaction, and burnout: factors impacting a professional's quality of life. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 12(3), 259-280. https://doi.org/10.1080/15325020701238093
  44. WIDARSIH, R., WIDYANA, R., & LAILATUSIFAH, S. (2021). The effectiveness of self-induced unclassified therapeutic tremor for decreasing secondary traumatic stress among social workers. Jurnal Psikologi, 20(1), 75-94. https://doi.org/10.14710/jp.20.1.75-94
  45. YAO, Z. & HSIEH, S. (2019). Neurocognitive mechanism of human resilience: a conceptual framework and empirical review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(24), 5123. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16245123
  46. ZACHER, H., & FRESE, M. (2009). Age and occupational success: The moderating role of cognitive ability and job performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 75(2), 156-167.
  47. ZACHER, H., & FRESE, M. (2011). Maintaining a focus on opportunities at work: The interplay between age, job complexity, and the use of selection, optimization, and compensation strategies. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(3), 291-318.
  48. ZAKERI, M., BAZMANDEGAN, G., GANJEH, H., ZAKERI, M., MOLLAAHMADI, S., ANBARIYAN, A., … & KAMIAB, Z. (2020). Is nurses’ clinical competence associated with their compassion satisfaction, burnout and secondary traumatic stress? a cross‐sectional study. Nursing Open, 8(1), 354-363. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.636
  49. ZHOU, X., MENG, Y., SCHMİTT, H., MONTAG, C., KENDRİCK, K., & BECKER, B. (2020). Cognitive flexibility mediates the association between early life stress and habitual behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 167, 110231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110231
  50. CİEŚLAK, R., SHOJİ, K., LUSZCZYNSKA, A., TAYLOR, S., ROGALA, A., & BENİGHT, C. (2013). Secondary trauma self-efficacy: concept and its measurement. Psychological Assessment, 25(3), 917-928. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032687
  51. HUANG, W., FANG, Y., TAN, X., & ZHAO, J. (2022). Childhood trauma, stressful life events, and depression: exploring the mediating effect of cognitive flexibility. Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001337
  52. IVİCİC, R. & MOTTA, R. (2017). Variables associated with secondary traumatic stress among mental health professionals. Traumatology an International Journal, 23(2), 196-204. https://doi.org/10.1037/trm0000065
  53. MERWE, A. & HUNT, X. (2019). Secondary trauma among trauma researchers: lessons from the field. Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy, 11(1), 10-18. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0000414
  54. OGIŃSKA-BULIK, N. & MICHALSKA, P. (2021). Psychological resilience and secondary traumatic stress in nurses working with terminally ill patients—the mediating role of job burnout. Psychological Services, 18(3), 398-405. https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000421