Dergiler / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2020 / Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 3

The implant density does not change the correction rate of the main and the accompanying curves: A comparison between consecutive and intermittent pedicle screw constructs

Sayfa
293–299
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The IPSC and CPSC groups did not demonstrate a significant change in the correction rate of the main and minor or major accompanying structural and nonstructural curves, and also in the SRS-22 scores.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and the coronal correction rate of the main and accompanying curves of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) corrected with pedicle screws inserted consecutively or intermittently.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: The prospectively collected data of 60 patients (8 men and 52 women; mean age: 14.6±2.5 years) who underwent corrective surgery for AIS between January 2010 and December 2015 were reviewed retrospectively.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The IPSC and CPSC groups did not demonstrate a significant change in the correction rate of the main and minor or major accompanying structural and nonstructural curves, and also in the SRS-22 scores.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:2010 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and the coronal correction rate of the main and accompanying curves of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) corrected with pedicle screws inserted consecutively or intermittently. Methods: The prospectively collected data of 60 patients (8 men and 52 women; mean age: 14.6±2.5 years) who underwent corrective surgery for AIS between January 2010 and December 2015 were reviewed retrospectively. Two groups were constituted according to the pedicle screw construct type: consecutive pedicle screw construct (CPSC) and intermittent pedicle screw construct (IPSC) groups. The preoperative, early postoperative, and 24-month follow-up radiographs and the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) scores were reevaluated. The Cobb angle of the main and accompanying curves, the correction rate, and the flexibility of the curves were calculated. Results: The mean preoperative Cobb angles were 57.03° and 57.46°, the mean postoperative Cobb angles were 14.93° and 14.4°, and the mean correction rates were 76.22% and 75.31% in IPSC and CPSC groups, respectively (p>0.05). The preoperative and postoperative accompanying curve magnitudes and correction rates were similar (p>0.05). These radiographic outcomes were also consistent with the SRS-22 scores. Conclusion: Both the pedicle screw constructs had satisfactory outcomes following the surgery, which were confirmed by both the SRS-22 scores and radiographs taken perioperatively and at follow-ups. The IPSC and CPSC groups did not demonstrate a significant change in the correction rate of the main and minor or major accompanying structural and nonstructural curves, and also in the SRS-22 scores.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ŞENKÖYLÜ, A., ÇETİNKAYA, M., DALDAL, İ., EREN, A., AKTAŞ, E. (2020). The implant density does not change the correction rate of the main and the accompanying curves: A comparison between consecutive and intermittent pedicle screw constructs. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 3, 293–299. https://ajindex.com/articles/141646

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Helenius I, Remes V, Yrjonen T, et al. Harrington and Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Long-term functional and radiographic outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003
  2. [Crossref] 2. Cotrel Y, Dubousset J. A new technic for segmental spinal osteosynthesis using the posterior approach. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2014
  3. [Crossref] 3. Boucher HH. A method of spinal fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1959
  4. [Crossref] 4. Quan GM, Gibson MJ. Correction of main thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using pedicle screw instrumentation: does higher implant density improve correction? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010
  5. [Crossref] 5. Sariyilmaz K, Ozkunt O, Karademir G, Gemalmaz HC, Dikici F, Domanic U. Does pedicle screw density matter in Lenke type 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? Medicine (Baltimore) 2018
  6. e9581. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009581. [Crossref] 6. Wang X, Larson AN, Crandall DG, et al. Biomechanical effect of pedicle screw distribution in AIS instrumentation using a segmental translation technique: computer modeling and simulation. Scoliosis Spinal Disord 2017
  7. doi: 10.1186/ s13013-017-0120-4. eCollection 2017. [Crossref] 7. Clements DH, Betz RR, Newton PO, Rohmiller M, Marks MC, Bastrom T. Correlation of scoliosis curve correction with the number and type of fixation anchors. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009
  8. [Crossref] 8. Delikaris A, Wang X, Boyer L, Larson AN, Ledonio CGT, Aubin CE. Implant density at the apex is more important than overall implant density for 3D correction in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using rod derotation and en bloc vertebral derotation technique. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2017
  9. [Crossref] 9. Luo M, Wang W, Shen M, Luo X, Xia L. Does higher screw density improve radiographic and clinical outcomes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? A systematic review and pooled analysis. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2017
  10. [Crossref] 10. Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J, et al. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001
  11. [Crossref] 11. Alanay A, Cil A, Berk H, et al. Reliability and validity of adapted Turkish Version of Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005
  12. [Crossref] 12. Carreon LY, Sanders JO, Diab M, et al. The minimum clinically important difference in Scoliosis Research Society-22 appear