KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics / 2026 / Volume: 10 Issue: 2

Role of Port Tugs in Ship-Borne Emissions: An Analysis in Izmit Bay-TURKIYE

Orhan Ergüven(İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DENİZ BİLİMLERİ VE İŞLETMECİLİĞİ ENSTİTÜSÜ)0009-0005-4018-4638
İrşad Bayırhan(İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DENİZ BİLİMLERİ VE İŞLETMECİLİĞİ ENSTİTÜSÜ)0000-0001-9404-399X
Cengiz Deniz(İSTANBUL TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-9702-4583
Cem Gazioğlu(İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DENİZ BİLİMLERİ VE İŞLETMECİLİĞİ ENSTİTÜSÜ)0000-0002-2083-4008
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2023-06-15
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This suggests that port tugs have a significant place among ship types in terms of producing exhaust emissions.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Thanks to the awareness created by the concrete effects of global warming and climatic irregularities, concepts such as carbon emissions, polluting gases, internal combustion engines, energy efficiency are gaining more and more importance in our lives globally.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this context, the maritime sector, which provides the transfer of 90% of global trade, has become the center of attention with its ships boasting huge machinery and has also been a subject of exhaust emission studies.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This suggests that port tugs have a significant place among ship types in terms of producing exhaust emissions.
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Ship emissions · port tugs · carbon emissions

Abstract

Thanks to the awareness created by the concrete effects of global warming and climatic irregularities, concepts such as carbon emissions, polluting gases, internal combustion engines, energy efficiency are gaining more and more importance in our lives globally. In this context, the maritime sector, which provides the transfer of 90% of global trade, has become the center of attention with its ships boasting huge machinery and has also been a subject of exhaust emission studies. The fact that approximately 70% of ship emissions occur in coastal areas requires more scrutiny of ships operating in these areas. Providing docking and departing services for ports, having small hull sizes compared to other ships but featuring big machinery in terms of power output (kW), port tugboats are a serious source of emissions. As a first in this literature, the present study aimed to make a 3-month emission inventory of port tugs in Izmit Bay, where Turkey’s largest shipping activities take place, and to compare it with emission studies for other ships. In the study period, port tugs’ emissions of CO2, NOX, SOX, VOC, PM, CO were calculated to be 7,398.88 tonnes, 121.09 tonnes, 66.43 tonnes, 2.13 tonnes, 4.27 tonnes, and 5.77 tonnes, respectively. This suggests that port tugs have a significant place among ship types in terms of producing exhaust emissions.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Ergüven, O., Bayırhan, İ., Deniz, C., Gazioğlu, C. (2023). Role of Port Tugs in Ship-Borne Emissions: An Analysis in Izmit Bay-TURKIYE. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, Volume: 10 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.30897/ijegeo.1300605

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (34)

  1. Aspelund, A., Mølnvik, M. J., De Koeijer, G. (2006). Ship Transport of CO2. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 84(9), 847–855. https://doi.org/10.1205/cherd.5147
  2. Atmaca, Ç., Sevimoğlu, O. (2020). Determination of City-Based Greenhouse Gas Emissions: The Case Study of Kocaeli Province. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, 1616–1627. https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.669651
  3. Bayırhan, İ., Mersin, K., Tokuşlu, A., Gazioğlu, C. (2019). Modelling of Ship Originated Exhaust Gas Emissions in the Strait of Istanbul (Bosphorus). International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, 6(3), 238–243. https://doi.org/10.30897/ijegeo.641397
  4. Bilgili, L., Celebi, U. B. (2016). Emission Routing in Maritime Transportation (pp. 837–849). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30127-3_62
  5. Chen, Z. S., Lam, J. S. L. (2022). Life cycle assessment of diesel and hydrogen power systems in tugboats. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 103, 103192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103192
  6. Chu Van, T., Ramirez, J., Rainey, T., Ristovski, Z., Brown, R. J. (2019). Global impacts of recent IMO regulations on marine fuel oil refining processes and ship emissions. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 70, 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.04.001
  7. Corbett, J. J., Winebrake, J. J., Green, E. H., Kasibhatla, P., Eyring, V., Lauer, A. (2007). Mortality from Ship Emissions: A Global Assessment. Environmental Science & Technology, 41(24), 8512–8518. https://doi.org/10.1021/es071686z
  8. Deniz, C., Zincir, B. (2016). Environmental and economical assessment of alternative marine fuels. Journal of Cleaner Production, 113, 438–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.089
  9. Ekmekçioğlu, A., Kuzu, S. L., Ünlügençoğlu, K., Çelebi, U. B. (2020). Assessment of shipping emission factors through monitoring and modelling studies. The Science of the Total Environment, 743, 140742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140742
  10. Entec UK. (2010). Entec UK Ship Emissions Inventory Final Report.
  11. Equasis-Electronic Ship Qualty Shipping İnformation System. (2020). The World Merchant Fleet In 2020. European Commission. (2017a). Study on Differentiated Port Infrastructure Charges to Promote
  12. Environmentally Friendly Maritime Transport Activities and Sustainable Transportation; Final Report. European Commission. (2017b). Study on Differentiated Port Infrastructure Charges to Promote
  13. Environmentally Friendly Maritime Transport Activities and Sustainable Transportation. International Maritime Organization -IMO. (2020). How significant is the reduction in sulphur oxides emissions?
  14. IMO. (2019, October). IMO 2020 – cutting sulphur oxide emissions.
  15. IMO. (2020). Fourth IMO GHG Study 2020.
  16. IPCC. (1996). the Science of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group I to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. WMO/UNEP. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  17. KEGM. (2016). İzmit VTS Service
  18. Kiliç, A., Deniz, C. (2009). Inventory of shipping emissions in Izmit Gulf, Turkey. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, 29(2), 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.10365
  19. Kocaeli Liman Başkanlığı. (2022). İzmit Körfezi Liman İstatistikleri. https://kocaeliliman.uab.gov.tr
  20. Kumar, B. A., Chandrasekar, M., Chelliah, T. R., Ramesh, U. S. (2018). Fuel Minimization in Diesel-Electric Tugboat Considering Flywheel Energy Storage System. 2018, IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference and Expo, Asia-Pacific (ITEC Asia-Pacific), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITEC-AP.2018.8433279
  21. Lebedevas, S., Norkevičius, L., Zhou, P. (2021). Investigation of effect on environmental performance of using lng as fuel for engines in seaport tugboats. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 9(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9020123
  22. Marinetraffic.com. (2021). Ship density map.
  23. Mersin, K. (2020). Review of total emission of transit Ships in the Dardanelle which including possible CO2 emission of 1915 Canakkale Bridge. Thermal Science, 24(Suppl. 1), 391–398. https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI20S1391M
  24. Mersin, K., Yıldırım, M. (2021). A New Formula for Calculation of Optimum Displacement and Its Effects. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics (IJEGEO), 9(3):021-000. https://doi.org/10.30897/ijegeo.972152
  25. National Aeronautics and Space Administration - NASA. (2022). Fuel Regulation Reduced Air Pollution from Shipping.
  26. Sofiev, M., Winebrake, J. J., Johansson, L., Carr, E. W., Prank, M., Soares, J., Vira, J., Kouznetsov, R., Jalkanen, J.-P., Corbett, J. J. (2018). Cleaner fuels for ships provide public health benefits with climate tradeoffs. Nature Communications, 9(1), 406. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02774-9
  27. ISO 8217 Bunker Standart, (2017). www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:8217:ed-6:v1:en
  28. Tokuşlu, A. (2019). İstanbul Boğazın’da Gemi Kaynaklı Egzoz Emisyonlarının Modellenmesi.
  29. Türk Loydu. (2023). Türk Loydu Newsletter. www.turkloydu.org
  30. UAB- Ulaştırma ve Altyapı Bakanlığı. (2022). 2021 Yılı Türk Boğazları Geçiş İstatistikleri. Limanlar Yönetmeliği, Port Tug Requirement List. The Official Gazette. (2012).
  31. Ülker, D., Bayırhan, İ., Mersin, K., Gazioğlu, C. (2021). A comparative CO2 emissions analysis and mitigation strategies of short-sea shipping and road transport in the Marmara Region. Carbon Management, 12(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2020.1852853
  32. UNCTAD. (2020). Challenges for international trade logistics United Nationals. (2023). Kyoto Protocol. https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdf United Nations. (1992). United Nations Framework
  33. Wang, C., Corbett, J. J. (2007). The costs and benefits of reducing SO2 emissions from ships in the US West Coastal waters. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 12(8), 577–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2007.08.003
  34. Yılmaz, Ö. Bayram, O. (2020). COVID-19 Pandemi döneminde Türkiye’de e-ticaret ve e-ihracat. Kayseri Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. https://doi.org/10.51177/kayusosder.777097.