Dergiler / International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences / 2020 / Volume: 5 Issue: 3

Accuracy assessments of Göktürk-1 satellite imagery

Gökhan Arasan(Harita Genel Müdürlüğü)0000-0002-9163-0950
Altan Yılmaz(Harita Genel Müdürlüğü)0000-0002-1926-0633
Orhan Fırat(Harita Genel Müdürlüğü)0000-0001-5775-2420
Ertuğrul Avşar(Harita Genel Müdürlüğü)0000-0003-1397-5870
Hasan Güner(Harita Genel Müdürlüğü)0000-0002-9604-9604
Kemal Ayğan(Harita Genel Müdürlüğü)0000-0002-6809-5582
Damla Yüce(Harita Genel Müdürlüğü)0000-0002-3343-4775
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2020-10-01
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

As a result, although the pointing accuracy and the Digital Surface Model accuracy produced from Göktürk-1 satellite imagery, will vary according to the incidence angle of Göktürk-1 satellite, the Digital Terrain Model used in the production of the orthoimage, the selected method for orientation of satellite imagery; a planimetric accuracy of better than ± 2 m RMSE in orthoimage and a height accuracy of better than ± 3 m RMSE is accomplished.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Optical satellite imagery has an important place today in terms of responding to the increasing need for geospatial base in many different fields and disciplines, especially because of their availability and temporal resolution.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Göktürk-1, an electro-optical satellite that was launched on December 5, 2016 and acquiring 0.50 m spatial resolution imagery, aims to meet the high resolution image requirements of Turkey.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:As a result, although the pointing accuracy and the Digital Surface Model accuracy produced from Göktürk-1 satellite imagery, will vary according to the incidence angle of Göktürk-1 satellite, the Digital Terrain Model used in the production of the orthoimage, the selected method for orientation of satellite imagery; a planimetric accuracy of better than ± 2 m RMSE in orthoimage and a height accuracy of better than ± 3 m RMSE is accomplished.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:2016 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Göktürk-1 · Satellite Imagery · Orthoimage

Abstract

Optical satellite imagery has an important place today in terms of responding to the increasing need for geospatial base in many different fields and disciplines, especially because of their availability and temporal resolution. Because all kinds of geospatial information and data production processes such as orthoimages, maps, vector data and etc. in especially for large project areas provide the opportunity to reduce the cost and time required in the field work, so the interest in high resolution satellite imagery. Göktürk-1, an electro-optical satellite that was launched on December 5, 2016 and acquiring 0.50 m spatial resolution imagery, aims to meet the high resolution image requirements of Turkey. In this study, the horizontal and vertical accuracy of the Digital Surface Model and orthoimages produced by different methods from stereo images obtained from Göktürk-1 satellite in two different regions were investigated. As a result, although the pointing accuracy and the Digital Surface Model accuracy produced from Göktürk-1 satellite imagery, will vary according to the incidence angle of Göktürk-1 satellite, the Digital Terrain Model used in the production of the orthoimage, the selected method for orientation of satellite imagery; a planimetric accuracy of better than ± 2 m RMSE in orthoimage and a height accuracy of better than ± 3 m RMSE is accomplished.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Arasan, G., Yılmaz, A., Fırat, O., Avşar, E., Güner, H., Ayğan, K., Yüce, D. (2020). Accuracy assessments of Göktürk-1 satellite imagery. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, Volume: 5 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.650899

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Cheng P. and Chaapel C., 2010. Pan-sharpening and geometric correction of WorldView-2 satellite. GEOInformatics 2010:30–33
  2. Di, K., Ma R. and Li R., 2003. Rational functions and potential for rigorous sensor model recovery. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 69(1), 33-41
  3. Li, R., Zhou F., Niu X., and Di K., 2007. Integration of Ikonos and QuickBird Imagery for geopositioning accuracy analysis. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 73 (9):1067–1074.
  4. Perko, R., Raggam, H. and Roth, P.M., 2019. Mapping with Pléiades—End-to-End Workflow. Remote Sensing 11 (17) 2052. DOI 10.3390/rs11172052
  5. Tao, V. and Hu, Y. 2002. 3D Reconstruction methods based on the rational function model. Photogrammetric Engineering Remote Sensing 68(7):705–714
  6. Telespazio, 2017 I. Göktürk-1 User Guide
  7. Telespazio, 2017 II. Göktürk-1 System Specification Technical Notes
  8. Telespazio, 2017 III. Göktürk-1 Product Specification Definitions Technical Notes
  9. Wang, S., Ren, Z., Wu, C., Lei, Q., Gong, W., Ou, Q., Zhang, H., Ren, G. and Li, C., 2019. DEM generation from Worldview-2 stereo imagery and vertical accuracy assessment for its application in active tectonics. Geomorphology. 336:107-118. DOI 10.1016/j.geomorph.2019.03.016.
  10. Yilmaz A., Erdogan M., Maras H.H., Aktug B. and Maras S.S., 2016. Did satellite imagery supersede aerial imagery? A perspective from 3D geopositioning accuracy. Arabian Journal of Geosciences (2016) 9: 324 DOI 10.1007/s12517-016-2386-x.
  11. Yilmaz A. and Erdogan M., 2020. Modelling the orthoimage accuracy using DEM accuracy and off-nadir angle, Geocarto International, 35 (1), 1-16. DOI: 10.1080/10106049.2018.1493157.
  12. Yilmaz A. and Erdogan M., 2018. Designing High Resolution Countrywide DEM For Turkey. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 3 (3), 98-107. DOI: 10.26833/ijeg.384822.