KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences / 2026 / Volume: 11 Issue: 3

Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri ve Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci Kullanılarak Yaz Turizm Bölgelerinde Kayak Merkezi Yer Seçimi

Site Selection for Ski Resort Development in Summer Tourism Regions Using Geographic Information Systems and the Analytic Hierarchy Process

Ramazan Yoldaş Satılmış(PAMUKKALE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, ÇAMELİ MESLEK YÜKSEKOKULU)0000-0003-2907-4022
Recep Çakır(PAMUKKALE ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-2395-4769
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2026-06-28
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Elde edilen sonuçlar bu dört tesisle karşılaştırılmış ve Çameli bölgesinde kayak merkezi kurulumu için en uygun alanlar belirlenmiştir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Yaz ayı turizminin baskın ve önemli olduğu bölgelerde kış turizminden yararlanmak oldukça güçtür.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Bu durum, özellikle son yıllarda gözlemlenen iklim değişikliğinin etkileri bağlamında daha da belirgin hale gelmiştir.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Elde edilen sonuçlar bu dört tesisle karşılaştırılmış ve Çameli bölgesinde kayak merkezi kurulumu için en uygun alanlar belirlenmiştir.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:GIS · InSAR · DEM

Özet

Yaz ayı turizminin baskın ve önemli olduğu bölgelerde kış turizminden yararlanmak oldukça güçtür. Bu durum, özellikle son yıllarda gözlemlenen iklim değişikliğinin etkileri bağlamında daha da belirgin hale gelmiştir. Bu çalışmada, yaz turizminin yaygın olduğu Akdeniz Bölgesi’nde yer alan Denizli ili Çameli ilçesinde, kış turizminde önemli bir role sahip olan kayak merkezleri için en uygun alan, Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri (CBS) ve Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci (AHP) yöntemleri kullanılarak belirlenmiştir. Yer seçimi süreci; kar örtüsü, yükselti, sıcaklık, rüzgâr, su kaynakları ve karayolu verilerini kapsayan kapsamlı bir analizle gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bu tür çalışmalarda sayısal yükseklik modellerinin (SYM) oluşturulmasında genellikle Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) verileri kullanılmaktadır. Ancak bu çalışmada, InSAR yöntemi aracılığıyla daha yüksek doğrulukta SYM verileri elde edilmiştir. Ayrıca analizler hem SRTM hem de InSAR verileri kullanılarak yapılmış ve elde edilen sonuçlar karşılaştırmalı olarak değerlendirilmiştir. Belirlenen kriterler doğrultusunda alan uygunluğunu değerlendirmek ve analizleri bu kriterlere göre yürütmek amacıyla, çalışma alanına 150 km mesafede yer alan ve kar koşullarına bağlı olarak kış aylarında sürekli faaliyet göstermeyen Tavas, Salda, Saklıkent ve Davraz kayak merkezleri incelenmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlar bu dört tesisle karşılaştırılmış ve Çameli bölgesinde kayak merkezi kurulumu için en uygun alanlar belirlenmiştir.

Abstract

It is quite difficult to benefit from winter tourism in regions where summer tourism is dominant, particularly under the increasing impacts of climate change observed in recent years. In this study, the most suitable locations for ski resort development in the Cameli District of Denizli—located in the Mediterranean region where summer tourism is prevalent—were identified using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The site selection was based on a comprehensive evaluation of environmental and physical factors, including snow cover, elevation, temperature, wind conditions, water resources, and road networks. Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) data were used to generate Digital Elevation Models (DEMs); however, higher-resolution DEMs were also obtained using the Interferometric SAR (InSAR) method to improve terrain representation. Analyses were conducted using both SRTM- and InSAR-derived DEMs, and the resulting suitability maps were comparatively evaluated. To define realistic snow cover conditions for seasonal winter tourism in a summer-dominated region, nearby ski resorts located within approximately 150 km of the study area—namely Denizli, Salda, Saklikent, and Davraz—were examined as reference cases, rather than for direct spatial comparison. Based on this integrated GIS–AHP analysis, the most suitable areas for ski resort development in the Cameli District were determined.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Satılmış, R. Y., Çakır, R. (2026). Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri ve Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci Kullanılarak Yaz Turizm Bölgelerinde Kayak Merkezi Yer Seçimi. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, Volume: 11 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.1805718

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (48)

  1. Ćurčić, N., Mirković Svitlica, A., Brankov, J., Bjeljac, Ž., Pavlović, S., & Jandžiković, B. (2021). The Role of Rural Tourism in Strengthening the Sustainability of Rural Areas: The Case of Zlakusa Village. Sustainability, 13(12), 6747. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126747
  2. Yılmaz, V. (2025). Climate patterns in Europe: A focus on ten countries through remote sensing. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 10(3), 398-418. https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.1583206
  3. Witting, M., Bischof, M., & Schmude, J. (2021). Behavioural change or “business as usual”? Characterising the reaction behaviour of winter (sport) tourists to climate change in two German destinations. International Journal of Tourism Research, 23(1), 110-122. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.2399
  4. Steiger, R., Damm, A., Prettenthaler, F., & Proebstl-Haider, U. (2021). Climate change and winter outdoor activities in Austria. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 34, 100330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2020.100330
  5. Sarı, S., & Türk, T. (2021). An investigation of urban development with geographical information systems: 100-year change of Sivas City, Turkey. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 6(1), 51-63. https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.690216
  6. Döner, F. (2022). The effect of tourism and legalization policies on summer pasture in Turkey. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 7(2), 142-153. https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.927503
  7. Utami, D. D., Dhewanto, W., & Lestari, Y. D. (2023). Rural tourism entrepreneurship success factors for sustainable tourism village: Evidence from Indonesia. Cogent Business & Management, 10(1), 2180845. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2180845
  8. Dursun, M. T., & Argun, S. Destinasyon Yönetimi Ve Sürdürülebilirliği Kapsaminda Festivaller: Denizli İlinde Bir Araştirma. Turizm Ve Destinasyon Araştirmalari II, 249.
  9. Royo-Vela, M. (2009). Rural-cultural excursion conceptualization: A local tourism marketing management model based on tourist destination image measurement. Tourism management, 30(3), 419-428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2008.07.013
  10. Keller, P. (2018). Sustainable mountain tourism: Opportunities for local communities. World Tourism Organization.
  11. Steiger, R., Knowles, N., Pöll, K., & Rutty, M. (2024). Impacts of climate change on mountain tourism: A review. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 32(9), 1984-2017. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2022.2112204
  12. Tripathi, A. K., Agrawal, S., & Gupta, R. D. (2022). Comparison of GIS-based AHP and fuzzy AHP methods for hospital site selection: a case study for Prayagraj City, India. GeoJournal, 87(5), 3507-3528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-021-10445-y
  13. Sivac, A., & Korjenić, A. A Gıs-Based Multı-Crıterıa Analysıs Of Optımal Skı Resort Locatıons In Sarajevo Canton. Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Management, 73. https://doi.org/10.35666/25662880.2024.10.73
  14. Gabdrakhmanov, N., & Hosseini, S. (2019, June). Site Location and Construction of Ski Resorts Using Geographical Information System (GIS) in Isfahan Province. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 272, No. 2, p. 022013). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/272/2/022013
  15. Silberman, J. A., & Rees, P. W. (2010). Reinventing mountain settlements: A GIS model for identifying possible ski towns in the US Rocky Mountains. Applied Geography, 30(1), 36-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2009.10.005
  16. Rafaqat, R. (2024). GIS based site suitability analysis for the identification of potential skiing resorts in Gilgit Baltistan, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Science, 76(2).
  17. Deng, J., Che, T., Xiao, C., Wang, S., Dai, L., & Meerzhan, A. (2019). Suitability analysis of ski areas in China: an integrated study based on natural and socioeconomic conditions. The Cryosphere, 13(8), 2149-2167. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-2149-2019
  18. Geneletti, D. (2008). Impact assessment of proposed ski areas: A GIS approach integrating biological, physical and landscape indicators. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 28(2-3), 116-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2007.05.011
  19. Aksoy, T. (2024). Kayak Merkezi için Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri (CBS) Destekli Yer Tespiti: Cilo ve Sat Dağları Millî Parkı Örneği. Anatolia: Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 35(2), 7-18. https://doi.org/10.17123/atad.1520727
  20. Savolainen, L. (2021). Ecotourism in the municipality of Cameli in Finnish and Scandinavian tourist view.
  21. Gao, X., Liu, Y., Li, T., & Wu, D. (2017). High Precision DEM Generation Algorithm Based on InSAR Multi-Look Iteration. Remote Sensing, 9(7), 741. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9070741
  22. Feng, Y., Zhou, Y., Chen, Y., Li, P., Xi, M., & Tong, X. (2022). Automatic selection of permanent scatterers-based GCPs for refinement and reflattening in InSAR DEM generation. International Journal of Digital Earth, 15(1), 954–974. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2022.2070678
  23. Wu, Z., Zhao, Z., Ma, P., & Huang, B. (2021). Real-world DEM super-resolution based on generative adversarial networks for improving InSAR topographic phase simulation. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 14, 8373-8385. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2021.3105123
  24. Tang, M., Zhao, Q., Pepe, A., Devlin, A. T., Falabella, F., Yao, C., & Li, Z. (2022). Changes of Chinese coastal regions induced by land reclamation as revealed through TanDEM-X DEM and InSAR analyses. Remote Sensing, 14(3), 637. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14030637
  25. Satir, O., Tosun, B., Coskun Ozyol, F., Ozdemir, O. F., & Berberoglu, S. (2024). An integrated spatial planning of the mountainous landscapes for ski sports in a case area at the eastern Türkiye. Journal of Mountain Science, 21(3), 754-767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-023-8309-x
  26. Scott, D., McBoyle, G., & Mills, B. (2003). Climate change and the skiing industry in southern Ontario (Canada): exploring the importance of snowmaking as a technical adaptation. Climate research, 23, 171-181. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr023171
  27. Tervo, K. (2008). The operational and regional vulnerability of winter tourism to climate variability and change: The case of the Finnish nature‐based tourism entrepreneurs. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 8(4), 317-332. https://doi.org/10.1080/15022250802553696
  28. Spandre, P., François, H., Thibert, E., Morin, S., & George-Marcelpoil, E. (2017). Determination of snowmaking efficiency on a ski slope from observations and modelling of snowmaking events and seasonal snow accumulation. The Cryosphere, 11(2), 891-909. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-891-2017
  29. De Freitas, C. R. (2005). The climate-tourism relationship and its relevance to climate change impact assessment. Tourism, Recreation and Climate Change: International Perspectives. CM Hall and J. Higham (eds). Channelview Press, UK, 29-43.
  30. Duglio, S., & Beltramo, R. (2016). Environmental Management and Sustainable Labels in the Ski Industry: A Critical Review. Sustainability, 8(9), 851. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8090851
  31. Wilson, G., Green, M., & Mack, K. (2018). Historical climate warming in the white mountains of New Hampshire (USA): implications for snowmaking water needs at ski areas. Mountain Research and Development, 38(2), 164-171. https://doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-17-00117
  32. Church, R. L., & Murray, A. T. (2009). Business site selection, location analysis, and GIS (pp. 209-233). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  33. Zambrano-Asanza, S., Quiros-Tortos, J., & Franco, J. F. (2021). Optimal site selection for photovoltaic power plants using a GIS-based multi-criteria decision making and spatial overlay with electric load. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 143, 110853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110853
  34. Bruno, G., & Giannikos, I. (2015). Location and GIS. In Location science (pp. 509-536). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13111-5_19
  35. Yılmaz, O. S., Gülgen, F., Güngör, R., & Kadı, F. (2018). Uzaktan algılama teknikleri ile arazi kullanım değişiminin incelenmesi: Köprübaşı İlçesi örneği. Geomatik Dergisi Journal of Geomatics Araştırma Makalesi DOI, 10, 233-241. https://doi.org/10.29128/geomatik.410987
  36. Arca, D., & Çıtıroğlu, H. K. (2022). Güneş enerjisi santral (GES) yapım yerlerinin CBS dayalı çok kriterli karar analizi ile belirlenmesi: Karabük örneği. Geomatik, 7(1), 17-25. https://doi.org/10.29128/geomatik.803200
  37. Batur, M., Alkan, R. M., Karaman, H., & Özener, H. (2025). Multi-dimensional optimization of nuclear emergency shelters: balancing capacity, evacuation efficiency, and supply accessibility. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 10(2), 244-261. https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.1596244
  38. Boutallaka, M., Miloud, T., El Mazi, M., Hmamouchi, M., & El Hairchi, K. (2025). Assessment of current and future land sensitivity to degradation under climate change in the upstream Ouergha watershed (Morocco) using GIS and AHP method. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 10(1), 46-58. https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.1521350
  39. Koca, C., & Kaymaz, Ç. K. (2024). CBS tabanlı ÇKKV-AHS yöntemi ile ekoturizm alanlarının yer seçimi: Çamlıhemşin İlçesi Örneği. Geomatik, 9(2), 185-206. https://doi.org/10.29128/geomatik.1419623
  40. Torkayesh, A. E., Hashemkhani Zolfani, S., Kahvand, M., & Khazaelpour, P. (2021). Landfill location selection for healthcare waste of urban areas using hybrid BWM-grey MARCOS model based on GIS. Sustain Cities Soc 67: 102712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102712
  41. Mijani, N., Alavipanah, S. K., Hamzeh, S., Firozjaei, M. K., & Arsanjani, J. J. (2019). Modeling thermal comfort in different condition of mind using satellite images: An Ordered Weighted Averaging approach and a case study. Ecological indicators, 104, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.04.069
  42. Shorabeh, S. N., Firozjaei, H. K., Firozjaei, M. K., Jelokhani-Niaraki, M., Homaee, M., & Nematollahi, O. (2022). The site selection of wind energy power plant using GIS-multi-criteria evaluation from economic perspectives. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 168, 112778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112778
  43. Shorabeh, S. N., Varnaseri, A., Firozjaei, M. K., Nickravesh, F., & Samany, N. N. (2020). Spatial modeling of areas suitable for public libraries construction by integration of GIS and multi-attribute decision making: Case study Tehran, Iran. Library & Information Science Research, 42(2), 101017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2020.101017
  44. Demir, A., Dincer, A. E., & Yılmaz, K. (2023). A novel method for the site selection of large-scale PV farms by using AHP and GIS: a case study in İzmir, Türkiye. Solar Energy, 259, 235-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2023.05.031
  45. Song, B., & Kang, S. (2016). A method of assigning weights using a ranking and nonhierarchy comparison. Advances in Decision Sciences, 2016.
  46. Saaty, T. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. mcgrawhill international. New York.
  47. Kayalık, M., & Polat, Z. A. (2023). CBS destekli nominal taşınmaz değer haritasının 3 boyutlu sunumu: Berlin Eyaleti örneği. Geomatik, 8(2), 180-191. https://doi.org/10.29128/geomatik.1178599
  48. Urfalı, T., & Eymen, A. (2021). CBS ve AHP Yöntemi Yardımıyla Kayseri İli Örneğinde Rüzgâr Enerji Santrallerinin Yer Seçimi. Geomatik, 6(3), 227-237. https://doi.org/10.29128/geomatik.772453