KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology / 2026 / Volume: 9 Issue: 1

Pythagorean Fuzzy AHP Approach for Evaluating the Importance Level of Industry 4.0 Technologies in the Automotive Manufacturing Industry

Sinan Çıkmak(DÜZCE ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-4704-3409
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2025-03-31
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The proposed approach will serve as a guide for decision-makers in selecting the appropriate Industry 4.0 technology in the automotive industry.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:To succeed in the rapidly advancing technological environment driven by Industry 4.0, automotive manufacturers need to swiftly embrace new technologies.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Moreover, the ability to introduce innovations to the market more quickly and sustainably hinges on the integration of Industry 4.0 technologies.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The proposed approach will serve as a guide for decision-makers in selecting the appropriate Industry 4.0 technology in the automotive industry.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Automotive industry · Industry 4.0 technologies · Multi-criteria decision-making

Abstract

To succeed in the rapidly advancing technological environment driven by Industry 4.0, automotive manufacturers need to swiftly embrace new technologies. Moreover, the ability to introduce innovations to the market more quickly and sustainably hinges on the integration of Industry 4.0 technologies. The automotive industry plays a crucial role in boosting the economy, generating a multiplier impact in Türkiye, much like it does in various countries around the world. Therefore, keeping a close eye on the digital transformation of the automotive industry is critical for establishing a cost-efficient, productive, and competitive market in a rapidly developing market. This study aims to indicate the importance level of Industry 4.0 technologies for automotive manufacturers operating in Türkiye. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method based on Pythagorean fuzzy sets was employed to achieve this aim. Pythagorean fuzzy sets are a contemporary fuzzy approach that gives experts more freedom to express their judgments regarding uncertainty and ambiguity in decision-making problems. The study results reveal that the top three most important technologies in the automotive manufacturing industry are “simulation and modeling”, “autonomous robots”, and “big data and analytics”, respectively. However, blockchain technology ranked lowest in terms of importance level. The proposed approach will serve as a guide for decision-makers in selecting the appropriate Industry 4.0 technology in the automotive industry.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Çıkmak, S. (2025). Pythagorean Fuzzy AHP Approach for Evaluating the Importance Level of Industry 4.0 Technologies in the Automotive Manufacturing Industry. International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology, Volume: 9 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech..1522257

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (67)

  1. Duman MC, Akdemir B. A study to determine the effects of industry 4.0 technology components on organizational performance. Technological forecasting and social change. 2021;167:120615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120615
  2. Kiel D, Müller JM, Arnold C, Voigt KI. Sustainable industrial value creation: Benefits and challenges of industry 4.0. International journal of innovation management. 2017;21(08):1740015. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919617400151
  3. Butt J. A strategic roadmap for the manufacturing industry to implement industry 4.0. Designs. 2020;4(2):11. https://doi.org/10.3390/designs4020011
  4. Zheng T, Ardolino M, Bacchetti A, Perona M. The applications of Industry 4.0 technologies in manufacturing context: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Production Research. 2021;59(6):1922–1954. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1824085
  5. Görçün ÖF, Mishra AR, Aytekin A, Simic V, Korucuk S. Evaluation of Industry 4.0 strategies for digital transformation in the automotive manufacturing industry using an integrated fuzzy decision-making model. Journal of Manufacturing Systems. 2024;74:922–948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2024.05.005
  6. Kumar S, Purohit BS, Manjrekar V, Singh V, Lad BK. Investigating the value of integrated operations planning: A case-based approach from automotive industry. International Journal of Production Research. 2018;56(22):6971–6992. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1424367
  7. Llopis-Albert C, Rubio F, Valero F. Impact of digital transformation on the automotive industry. Technological forecasting and social change. 2021;162:120343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120343
  8. Prajapati DK, Mathiyazhagan K, Agarwal V, Khorana S, Gunasekaran A. Enabling industry 4.0: Assessing technologies and prioritization framework for agile manufacturing in India. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2024;447:141488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141488
  9. Maretto L, Faccio M, Battini D. A multi-criteria decision-making model based on fuzzy logic and AHP for the selection of digital technologies. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 2022;55(2):319–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.04.213
  10. Bakioglu G, Atahan AO. AHP integrated TOPSIS and VIKOR methods with Pythagorean fuzzy sets to prioritize risks in self-driving vehicles. Applied Soft Computing. 2021;99:106948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106948
  11. Xu F, Liu J, Lin S, Yuan J. A VIKOR-based approach for assessing the service performance of electric vehicle sharing programs: A case study in Beijing. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2017;148:254-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.162
  12. Girubha RJ, Vinodh S. Application of fuzzy VIKOR and environmental impact analysis for material selection of an automotive component. Materials & Design. 2012;37:478-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.01.022
  13. Ayyildiz E, Taskin Gumus A. Pythagorean fuzzy AHP based risk assessment methodology for hazardous material transportation: an application in Istanbul. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2021;28(27):35798–35810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13223-y
  14. Ayyildiz E, Taskin Gumus A. Interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy AHP method-based supply chain performance evaluation by a new extension of SCOR model: SCOR 4.0. Complex & Intelligent Systems. 2021b;7(1):559-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-020-00221-9
  15. Başaran Y, Aladağ H, Işık Z. Pythagorean fuzzy AHP based dynamic subcontractor management framework. Buildings. 2023; 13(5):1351. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13051351
  16. Yager RR. Pythagorean fuzzy subsets. In2013 joint IFSA world congress and NAFIPS annual meeting (IFSA/NAFIPS) 2013;(pp. 57–61). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IFSA-NAFIPS.2013.6608375
  17. Garg H. A novel correlation coefficients between Pythagorean fuzzy sets and its applications to decision‐making processes. International Journal of Intelligent Systems. 2016;31(12):1234–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21827
  18. Ilbahar E, Karaşan A, Cebi S, Kahraman C. A novel approach to risk assessment for occupational health and safety using Pythagorean fuzzy AHP & fuzzy inference system. Safety science. 2018;103:124–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.10.025
  19. Yucesan M, Gul M. Hospital service quality evaluation: an integrated model based on Pythagorean fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS. Soft Computing. 2020;24(5):3237–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04084-2
  20. Lin D, Lee CK, Lau H, Yang Y. Strategic response to Industry 4.0: an empirical investigation on the Chinese automotive industry. Industrial Management & Data Systems. 2018;118(3):589–605. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2017-0403
  21. Sonntag M, Mehmann J, Teuteberg F. Application of Industry 4.0 in the automotive sector. In Adapting to the Future: How Digitalization Shapes Sustainable Logistics and Resilient Supply Chain Management. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL),2021 (pp. 151–182). Berlin: epubli GmbH. https://doi.org/10.15480/882.3989
  22. Konstantinidis FK, Mouroutsos SG, Gasteratos A. The role of machine vision in industry 4.0: an automotive manufacturing perspective. In 2021 IEEE international conference on imaging systems and techniques (IST) 2021 Aug 24 (pp. 1–6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IST50367.2021.9651453
  23. Mahut F, Daaboul J, Bricogne M, Eynard B. Product-Service Systems for servitization of the automotive industry: a literature review. International Journal of Production Research. 2017;55(7):2102–2120. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2016.1252864
  24. Wilkesmann M, Wilkesmann U. Industry 4.0–organizing routines or innovations? VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems. 2018;48(2):238–254. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-04-2017-0019
  25. Dutt, D., Giffi, C., Haberman, T., McGinnis, T., Natarajan, V., Robinson, R., Schiller, T., Scmith, S., Vitale Jr., J., & Wilson, A. Industry 4.0 in automotive Digitizing the end-to-end automotive value chain. In Deloitte Insights. 2020. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/insights/us/articles/automotive-news_industry-4-0-in-automotive/DI_Automotive-News-Supplement.pdf [Accessed 26th Jun 2024].
  26. Pişkin S. Otomotiv sektör raporu: Türkiye otomotiv sanayii rekabet gücü ve talep dinamikleri perspektifinde 2020 iç pazar beklentileri. TSKB Ekonomik Araştırmalar. 2017. http://www.tskb.com.tr/i/content/3081_1_Otomotiv%20Sektor%20Raporu.pdf [Accessed 15th Apr 2024].
  27. Üstündağ, A. Tedarik Zinciri Risklerinin Değerlendirilmesi ve Otomotiv Sektöründe Bir Uygulama. [thesis]. Sakarya University; 2024
  28. OSD(Otomotiv Sanayii Derneği).Otomotiv sanayii 2022 yılı küresel değerlendirme raporu. 2023. https://www.osd.org.tr/saved-files/PDF/2023/09/14/2022%20Kuresel%20Degerlendirme%20Raporu.pdf [Accessed 13th Jun 2024].
  29. KPMG.Otomotiv sektörel bakış. 2023. https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/tr/pdf/2023/08/otomotiv-sektorel-bakis-2023.pdf [Accessed 21th Jun 2024].
  30. UİB (Uludağ Otomotiv Endüstrisi İhracatçıları Birliği).2024 https://uib.org.tr/tr/birliklerimiz-uludag-otomotiv-endustrisi-ihracatcilari-birligi-oib-hakkinda.html [Accessed 13th Jun 2024].
  31. Nara EO, da Costa MB, Baierle IC, Schaefer JL, Benitez GB, do Santos LM, Benitez LB. Expected impact of industry 4.0 technologies on sustainable development: A study in the context of Brazil's plastic industry. Sustainable Production and Consumption. 2021;25:102–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.07.018
  32. Bai C, Dallasega P, Orzes G, Sarkis J. Industry 4.0 technologies assessment: A sustainability perspective. International journal of production economics. 2020;229:107776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107776
  33. Jamwal A, Agrawal R, Sharma M, Giallanza A. Industry 4.0 technologies for manufacturing sustainability: A systematic review and future research directions. Applied Sciences. 2021;11(12):5725. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11125725
  34. Karnik N, Bora U, Bhadri K, Kadambi P, Dhatrak P. A comprehensive study on current and future trends towards the characteristics and enablers of industry 4.0. Journal of Industrial Information Integration. 2022; 27: 100294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2021.100294
  35. Culot G, Fattori F, Podrecca M, Sartor M. Addressing industry 4.0 cybersecurity challenges. IEEE Engineering Management Review. 2019;47(3):79–86. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2019.2927559
  36. Dawson M. Cyber security in industry 4.0: The pitfalls of having hyperconnected systems. Journal of Strategic Management Studies. 2018;10(1):19–28. https://doi.org/10.24760/iasme.10.1_19
  37. Ben-Daya M, Hassini E, Bahroun Z. Internet of things and supply chain management: a literature review. International journal of production research. 2019;57(15-16):4719–4742. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1402140
  38. Peng X, Yang Y. Fundamental properties of interval‐valued Pythagorean fuzzy aggregation operators. International journal of intelligent systems. 2016;31(5):444–487. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21790
  39. Karasan A, Ilbahar E, Kahraman C. A novel pythagorean fuzzy AHP and its application to landfill site selection problem. Soft Computing.2019;23:10953–10968. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3649-0
  40. Zhang X, Xu Z. Extension of TOPSIS to multiple criteria decision making with Pythagorean fuzzy sets. International journal of intelligent systems. 2014;29(12):1061–1078. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21676
  41. Bruck L, Haycock B, Emadi A. A review of driving simulation technology and applications. IEEE Open Journal of Vehicular Technology. 2020;2:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/OJVT.2020.3036582
  42. Papulová Z, Gažová A, Šufliarský Ľ. Implementation of automation technologies of industry 4.0 in automotive manufacturing companies. Procedia Computer Science. 2022;200:1488–1497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.350
  43. Bogue R. The changing face of the automotive robotics industry. Industrial Robot: the international journal of robotics research and application. 2022;49(3):386–390. https://doi.org/10.1108/IR-01-2022-0022
  44. Gamal A, Mohamed M. A hybrid MCDM approach for industrial robots selection for the automotive industry. Neutrosophic Systems with Applications. 2023;4:1–11. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8212-1572
  45. Lee CC, Qin S, Li Y. Does industrial robot application promote green technology innovation in the manufacturing industry? Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2022;183:121893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121893
  46. Deloitte LLP. Big data and analytics in the automotive industry: Automotive analytics thought piece Contents. 2015. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/uk/Documents/manufacturing/deloitte-uk-automotive-analytics.pdf [Accessed 15th June 2024].
  47. Luckow A, Kennedy K, Manhardt F, Djerekarov E, Vorster B, Apon A. Automotive big data: Applications, workloads and infrastructures. In2015 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) 2015 Oct 29 (pp. 1201–1210). IEEE. https://orcid.org/10.1109/BigData.2015.7363874
  48. Wang J, Xu C, Zhang J, Zhong R. Big data analytics for intelligent manufacturing systems: A review. Journal of Manufacturing Systems. 2022;62:738–752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.03.005
  49. Yan J, Meng Y, Lu L, Li L. Industrial big data in an industry 4.0 environment: Challenges, schemes, and applications for predictive maintenance. IEE Access. 2017;5:23484–23491. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2765544
  50. Parisi GI, Kemker R, Part JL, Kanan C, Wermter S. Continual lifelong learning with neural networks: A review. Neural Networks. 2019;113:54-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2019.01.012
  51. Ren L, Zhang L, Wang L, Tao F, Chai X. Cloud manufacturing: key characteristics and applications. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing. 2017;30(6):501–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2014.902105
  52. Dar AA. Cloud computing-positive impacts and challenges in business perspective. Journal of Computer Science & Systems Biology. 2018;12(1):15–8. https://doi.org/10.4172/jcsb.1000294
  53. Krohn-Grimberghe A, Gupta A, Chadha A, Vyas R. Cloud computing in optimizing supply chain management of automotive component industry. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Internet of Things and Machine Learning 2017 Oct 17 (pp. 1–3). https://doi.org/10.1145/3109761.3109807
  54. Chouchene A, Ventura Carvalho A, Charrua-Santos F, Barhoumi W. Augmented reality-based framework supporting visual inspection for automotive industry. Applied System Innovation. 2022;5(3):48. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi5030048
  55. Gattullo M, Scurati GW, Fiorentino M, Uva AE, Ferrise F, Bordegoni M. Towards augmented reality manuals for industry 4.0: A methodology. robotics and computer-integrated manufacturing. 2019;56:276–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2018.10.001
  56. Rejeb A, Keogh JG, Wamba SF, Treiblmaier H. The potentials of augmented reality in supply chain management: A state-of-the-art review. Management review quarterly. 2020:1–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-020-00201-w
  57. Boboc RG, Gîrbacia F, Butilă EV. The application of augmented reality in the automotive industry: A systematic literature review. Applied Sciences. 2020;10(12):4259. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10124259
  58. Fernández-López A, Fernández-Castro B, García-Coego D. MI & AI application for the automotive industry. In Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence with Industrial Applications: From Big Data to Small Data 2022 Mar 12 (pp. 79-102). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91006-8_4
  59. Kamran SS, Haleem A, Bahl S, Javaid M, Prakash C, Budhhi D. Artificial intelligence and advanced materials in automotive industry: Potential applications and perspectives. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2022;62:4207–4214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.727
  60. Srivastava, S. (2024). How is AI Transforming the Future of the Automotive Industry? Benefits and Use Cases. Appinventiv. 2024. https://appinventiv.com/blog/ai-in-automotive-industry/ [Accessed 19th June 2024].
  61. Upadhyay A, Ayodele JO, Kumar A, Garza-Reyes JA. A review of challenges and opportunities of blockchain adoption for operational excellence in the UK automotive industry. Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing. 2021;14(1):7–60. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGOSS-05-2020-0024
  62. Xu X, Tatge L, Xu X, Liu Y. Blockchain applications in the supply chain management in German automotive industry. Production Planning & Control. 2022;35(9):917–931. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2022.2044073
  63. Pardhı S, Deshmukh A, Ajrouche H. Modelling and simulation of detailed vehicle dynamics for development of innovative powertrains. International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology. 2021;5(3):244-53. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.931066
  64. Čech M, Wicher P, Lenort R, Malčic T, David J, Holman D, Staš D, Záruba J. Autonomous mobile robot technology for supplying assembly lines in the automotive industry. Acta logistica. 2020;7(2):103-109. https://doi:10.22306/al.v7i2.164
  65. Beier G, Kiefer J, Knopf J. Potentials of big data for corporate environmental management: A case study from the German automotive industry. Journal of Industrial Ecology. 2022;26(1):336-49. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13062
  66. Cieśla J, Ulewicz R. The Future of Automotive Quality Control: How Cloud-Based Reporting is Changing the Game. Management Systems in Production Engineering. 2024;32(1):72-9. https://doi.org/10.2478/mspe-2024-0008
  67. Pardhı S, Deshmukh A, Ajrouche H. Modelling and simulation of detailed vehicle dynamics for development of innovative powertrains. International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology. 2021;5(3):244-53. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.931066