Dergiler / International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology / 2026 / Volume: 10 Issue: 1

Crashworthiness Optimization a Novel Hexagonal Honeycomb Crash Box Under Crushing Test – A Numerical Study

Desi Gustiani(Sakarya Uygulamalı Bilimler Üniversitesi)0009-0001-5357-0475
Ömer Seçgin(Sakarya Uygulamalı Bilimler Üniversitesi)0000-0001-6158-3164
Ahmet Demirer(Sakarya Uygulamalı Bilimler Üniversitesi)0000-0003-1252-9203
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2026-03-11
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

At a velocity of 3 m/s, the deformation pattern is consistent with previously reported studies, where the initial fold or fracture initiates in the middle of the honeycomb structure.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The crash box becomes a crucial component of the vehicle structure, special designed for energy-absorbing during collisions.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This study aims to evaluate the performance of honeycomb structures in crash boxes and to investigate the deformation characteristics, energy absorption, and reaction force during crash tests.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:At a velocity of 3 m/s, the deformation pattern is consistent with previously reported studies, where the initial fold or fracture initiates in the middle of the honeycomb structure.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Crash Box · Crashworthiness · Finite Element Method

Abstract

The crash box becomes a crucial component of the vehicle structure, special designed for energy-absorbing during collisions. This study aims to evaluate the performance of honeycomb structures in crash boxes and to investigate the deformation characteristics, energy absorption, and reaction force during crash tests. In this work, a novel crash box based on the hexagonal honeycomb structure with variations in the addition of circles at each hexagonal corner is proposed. The research configurations simulate a crushing test on the traditional honeycomb structure and variations CH 1, CH 2, CH 3 and CH 4. The honeycomb model was analyszed using different impactor velocity of 3 m/s and 4 m/s, with a mass of 500 kg. The result shows that increasing the size of the circle structures at each hexagonal honeycomb corner can increase crash energy absorption (EA). The CH 3 and CH 4 crash box structures offer the most increases in EA for each crash velocity than the traditional honeycomb. Higher impact velocities activate more stable progressive folding mechanisms in the honeycomb, thereby enhancing deformation efficiency during impact. The CH4 configuration exhibits higher SEA and MCF while maintaining a stable PCF, reflecting enhanced crashworthiness performance. This improvement is associated with progressive local buckling, which enables controlled and stable energy dissipation during impact. At a velocity of 3 m/s, the deformation pattern is consistent with previously reported studies, where the initial fold or fracture initiates in the middle of the honeycomb structure.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Gustiani, D., Seçgin, Ö., Demirer, A. (2026). Crashworthiness Optimization a Novel Hexagonal Honeycomb Crash Box Under Crushing Test – A Numerical Study. International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology, Volume: 10 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech..1847010

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (35)

  1. Ahmed SK, Mohammed MG, Abdulqadir SO, El-Kader RGA, El-Shall NA, Chandran D, et al. Road traffic accidental injuries and deaths: A neglected global health issue. Heal Sci Reports. 2023;6:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1240
  2. Abdullah NAZ, Sani MSM, Salwani MS, Husain NA. A review on crashworthiness studies of crash box structure. Thin-Walled Struct. 2020;153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2020.106795
  3. Wang W, Dai S, Zhao W, Wang C. Multi-objective optimization of hexahedral pyramid crash box using MOEA/D-DAE algorithm. Appl Soft Comput. 2022;118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2022.108481
  4. Yang C, Zhao Z, Guo W, Xu P, Zhou S, Yan L, et al. Parametric beam-based crashworthiness optimisation for the crush zone of a subway vehicle. Thin-Walled Struct. 2023;183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2022.110387
  5. Erdil A, Seçgin Ö. Effect of Cross-Sectional Shape on Energy Absorption in Crash Boxes. J Chinese Soc Mech Eng. 2025;46.
  6. Sultan M, Kandil A, Baraya M. Crashworthiness Performance Evaluation of Thin-Walled Tubes Filled with Single and Hybrid-Lattice Structures Under Axial Impact Loading Using Finite Element Analysis. Int J Automot Sci Technol. 2025;9(3):284-293. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.1711179
  7. Samin SAN, Hossen S, Rahman KMM, Gosh U. Lightweighting of a Vehicle Steering Uprights via Structural-Based Design and FEA Analysis. Engineering Perspective. 2024;4(4):157-170. https://doi.org/10.29228/eng.pers.78029
  8. Gökciler OC, Geren N. An Approach to Selection and Evaluation of Battery Enclosure Materials for Electric Vehicles. Int J Automot Sci Technol. 2026;10(1):64-75. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.1830219
  9. Özen İ, Gedikli H, Aslan M. Experimental and numerical investigation on energy absorbing characteristics of empty and cellular filled composite crash boxes. Eng Struct. 2023;289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.116315
  10. Xiao Y, Wen X, Lu S, Liang D, Hu H, Long H, et al. Analysis of Factors Affecting Crashworthiness of CFRP Thin-Walled Square Tubes Filled with Gradient Aluminum Foam. J Mater Eng Perform. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-023-08460-w
  11. Yang C, Meng K, Yang L, Guo W, Xu P, Zhou S. Transfer learning-based crashworthiness prediction for the composite structure of a subway vehicle. Int J Mech Sci. 2023;248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.108244
  12. Teng C, Song Z, Zhou C, Hao P, Wang B. The imperfection sensitivity of trapezoid origami crash boxes. Thin-Walled Struct. 2024;196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2023.111486
  13. Nassar M, Polat K, Koçlu Y, Topaç MM. Design and Optimisation of a Double Wishbone Independent Suspension System for an L6 Electric Vehicle: A Response Surface Methodology Based Design Application. Engineering Perspective. 2025;5(1):21-30. https://doi.org/10.29228/eng.pers.79569
  14. Tsai C-L, Hsieh C-C, Cheng Y-C. Improvement Design for A Double-Layer Honeycomb Structure using Uniform Design for Static and Dynamic Stress Analysis. J Chinese Soc Mech Eng. 2023;44:413–23.
  15. Altin M, Acar E, Güler MA. Crashworthiness optimization of hierarchical hexagonal honeycombs under out-of-plane impact. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci. 2021;235:963–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954406220939104
  16. Wang J, Zhang Y, He N, Wang CH. Crashworthiness behavior of Koch fractal structures. Mater Des. 2018;144:229–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.02.035
  17. Simpson J, Kazancı Z. Crushing investigation of crash boxes filled with honeycomb and re-entrant (auxetic) lattices. Thin-Walled Struct. 2020;150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2020.106676
  18. Yuan L, Shi H, Ma J, You Z. Quasi-static impact of origami crash boxes with various profiles. Thin-Walled Struct. 2019;141:435–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2019.04.028
  19. Jongpradist P, Tongthong S, Kongwat S, Ruangjirakit K, Thongchom C, Hasegawa H. Optimizing functionally graded hexagonal crash boxes with honeycomb filler for enhanced crashworthiness. Structures. 2024;59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2023.105775
  20. Hou W, He P, Yang Y, Sang L. Crashworthiness optimization of crash box with 3D-printed lattice structures. Int J Mech Sci. 2023;247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.108198
  21. Wan M, Hu D, Zhang H, Pi B, Ye X. Crashworthiness study of tubular lattice structures based on triply periodic minimal surfaces under quasi-static axial crushing. Compos Struct. 2024;327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117703
  22. Wang G, Zhang Y, Zheng Z, Chen H, Yu J. Crashworthiness design and impact tests of aluminum foam-filled crash boxes. Thin-Walled Struct. 2022;180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2022.109937
  23. Djamaluddin F. Optimization of foam-filled crash-box under axial loading for pure electric vehicle. Results Mater. 2024;21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinma.2023.100505
  24. Wesselmecking S, Kreins M, Dahmen M, Bleck W. Material oriented crash-box design – Combining structural and material design todoc_improve specific energy absorption. Mater Des. 2022;213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021.110357
  25. Gao Q, Ge C, Zhuang W, Wang L, Ma Z. Crashworthiness analysis of double-arrowed auxetic structure under axial impact loading. Mater Des. 2019;161:22–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.11.013
  26. Gustiani D, Seçgin Ö, Kolip A, Çelik HA. Finite Element Analysis of Novel Hexagonal Honeycomb Sandwich Beam Performance under a Three-Point Bending Effect. J Chinese Soc Mech Eng. 2025;46:643–50.
  27. Li S, Sui J, Ding F, Wu S, Chen W, Wang C. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory Optimization of Milling Aluminum Alloy 6061-T6 using Modified Johnson-Cook Model. Simul Model Pract Theory. 2021;111:102330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2021.102330
  28. Zhou C, Zhou Y, Wang B. Crashworthiness design for trapezoid origami crash boxes. Thin-Walled Struct. 2017;117:257–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2017.03.022
  29. Li QQ, Li E, Chen T, Wu L, Wang GQ, He ZC. Improve the frontal crashworthiness of vehicle through the design of front rail. Thin-Walled Struct. 2021;162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2021.107588
  30. Yu Y, Gong X, Li J, Gao G, Li J. Crashworthiness performance and optimization of multi-cell aluminum tubes under axial loading. Structures. 2023;55:1556–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2023.06.085
  31. Akın Y, Han K, Tüylü A, Aktaş NF, Çobaner S, Çerlek Ö, et al. Compressive strength and performance of horizontally and vertically oriented hybrid lattice structures manufactured by stereolithography. J Process Mech Eng. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1177/09544089251400793
  32. Taşdemir V. Investigation of energy absorption performance of functionally graded TPMS structures produced by fused deposition modeling. Iran Polym J. 2025:0–9.
  33. Xu X, Zhang Y, Wang J, Jiang F, Wang CH. Crashworthiness design of novel hierarchical hexagonal columns. Compos Struct. 2018;194:36–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.03.099
  34. Sultan M, Kandil A, Baraya M. Crashworthiness Performance Evaluation of Thin-Walled Tubes Filled with Single and Hybrid-Lattice Structures Under Axial Impact Loading Using Finite Element Analysis. Int J Automot Sci Technol. 2025;9(3):284-293. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.1711179
  35. Gökciler OC, Geren N. An Approach to Selection and Evaluation of Battery Enclosure Materials for Electric Vehicles. Int J Automot Sci Technol. 2026;10(1):64-75. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.1830219