KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education / 2020 / Volume: 7 Issue: 4

Spatial Models for Identifying Factors in Student Academic Achievement

Filiz Akbaş-yeşilyurt(PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITY)0000-0003-1629-4747
Hüseyin Koçak(PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-9683-6096
Muhammet Ensar Yeşilyurt(PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-5610-3146
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2020-12-20
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

We observed an interaction between students who live in the same neighbourhood and found evidence of an interaction among students in terms of their achievement based on a spatial error model.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In the literature, estimation results of the determinants of academic achievement are controversial.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:There may be several reasons for these controversial results, including sample or cultural differences.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:We observed an interaction between students who live in the same neighbourhood and found evidence of an interaction among students in terms of their achievement based on a spatial error model.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Student achievement · interaction · school

Özet

In the literature, estimation results of the determinants of academic achievement are controversial. There may be several reasons for these controversial results, including sample or cultural differences. Conversely, these results may arise from ignoring certain important facts, such as an interaction effect. Some studies do not consider interactions among students, and some studies may not use effective models. Surprisingly, very few studies have focused on student academic achievement using spatial models, which may be one of the most suitable models for testing interaction effects. In this study, we estimated student achievement using spatial models and a data sets from Turkey. We observed an interaction between students who live in the same neighbourhood and found evidence of an interaction among students in terms of their achievement based on a spatial error model.

Abstract

In the literature, estimation results of the determinants of academic achievement are controversial. There may be several reasons for these controversial results, including sample or cultural differences. Conversely, these results may arise from ignoring certain important facts, such as an interaction effect. Some studies do not consider interactions among students, and some studies may not use effective models. Surprisingly, very few studies have focused on student academic achievement using spatial models, which may be one of the most suitable models for testing interaction effects. In this study, we estimated student achievement using spatial models and a data sets from Turkey. We observed an interaction between students who live in the same neighbourhood and found evidence of an interaction among students in terms of their achievement based on a spatial error model.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Akbaş-yeşilyurt, F., Koçak, H., Yeşilyurt, M. E. (2020). Spatial Models for Identifying Factors in Student Academic Achievement. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, Volume: 7 Issue: 4. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.722460

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (88)

  1. Aaronson, D. (1998). Using sibling data to estimate the impact of neighborhoods on children’s educational outcomes. Journal of Human Resources, 33, 915 946. https://doi.org/10.2307/146403
  2. Adejoro, O. E. (2016), Does location also matter? A spatial analysis of social achievements of young south Australians [Unpublished Master Thesis]. Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science, Lund University, Lund, 2016.
  3. Akerhielm, K. (1995). Does class size matter?. Economics of Education Review, 14(3), 229-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7757(95)00004-4
  4. Akerlof, G. A. (1997). Social distance and social decisions. Econometrica, 65(5), 1005-1027. https://doi.org/10.2307/2171877
  5. Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Springer Science & Business Media.
  6. Aslund, O., Edin, Per-Anders, Fredriksson, P., & Grönqvist, H. (2011). Peers, neighborhoods, and immigrant student achievement: evidence from a placement policy. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 3(2), 67-95. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.3.2.67
  7. Bayer, P., Hjalmarsson, R., & Pozen, D. (2009). Building criminal capital behind bars: Peer effects in juvenile corrections. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(1), 105–147. https://doi.org/10.3386/w12932
  8. Bernheim, B. D. (1994). A theory of conformity. Journal of Political Economy, 102, 841-877. https://doi.org/10.1086/261957
  9. Blatchford, P., & Mortimore, P. (1994). The issue of class size for young children in schools: What can we learn from the research?. Oxford Review of Education, 20(4), 411-428. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305498940200402
  10. Booth, A., & Kee, H. (2006). Birth order matters: The effect of family size and birth order on educational attainment. Journal of Population Economics, 22(2), 367 397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-007-0181-4
  11. Brannstrom, L. (2008). Making their mark: The effects of neighbourhood and upper secondary school on educational achievement. European Sociological Review, 24(4), 463–478. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcn013
  12. Bray, M. (2013). Shadow education: comparative perspectives on the expansion and implications of private supplementary tutoring. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 77(22), 412-420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.03.096
  13. Brock, W. A., & Durlauf, S. N. (2001). Discrete choice with social interactions. The Review of Economic Studies, 68(2), 235-260. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-937X.00168
  14. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1994). Ecological models of human development. Readings on the Development of Children, 2(1), 37-43.
  15. Brooks-Gunn, J., Duncan, G. J., Klebanov, P. K., & Sealand, N. (1993). Do neighborhoods influence child and adolescent development?. American Journal of Sociology, 99, 353-95. https://doi.org/10.1086/230268
  16. Coleman, J. S. (1961). The adolescent society: the social life of the teenager and its impact on education. Free Press of Glencoe.
  17. Correa, H. (1993). An economic analysis of class size and achievement in education. Education Economics, 1(2), 129-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645299300000019
  18. Dietz, R. D. (2002). The estimation of neighborhood effects in the social sciences: An interdisciplinary approach. Social Science Research, 31(4), 539 575. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0049-089X(02)00005-4
  19. Dincer, M. A. & Uysal, G. (2010). The determinants of student achievement in Turkey, International Journal of Educational Development, 30(6), 592 598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2010.05.005
  20. Dubow, E.F., Boxer, P., & Huesmann, L. R. (2009). Long-term effects of parents’ education on children’s educational and occupational success: Mediation by family interactions, child aggression, and teenage aspirations, Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 55(3), 224-249. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.0.0030
  21. Duncan, G. J., Yeung, W. J., Brooks-Gunn, J., & Smith, J. R. (1998). How much does childhood poverty affect the life chances of children?. American Sociological Review, 63(3), 406-423. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657556
  22. Duncan, G., & Magnuson, K. (2005). Can family socioeconomic resources account for racial and ethnic test score gaps?. Future of Children, 15(1), 35 54. https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.2005.0004
  23. Duncan, G J. (1994). Families and neighbors as sources of disadvantage in the schooling decisions of black and white adolescents. American Journal of Education, 103(1), 20-53. https://doi.org/10.1086/444088
  24. Elhorst, J. P. (2010). Dynamic panels with endogenous interaction effects when T is small, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 40(5), 272 282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2010.03.003
  25. Elhorst, J. P. (2013). Spatial Econometrics: From Cross-Sectional Data to Spatial Panels. Springer-Verlag.
  26. Elhorst, P., Zandberg, E., & de Haan, J. (2013). The impact of interaction effects among neighbouring countries on financial liberalization and reform: A dynamic spatial panel data approach. Spatial Economic Analysis, 8(3), 293 313. https://doi.org/10.1080/17421772.2012.760136
  27. Ertur, C., & Koch, W. (2007). Growth, technological interdependence and spatial externalities: Theory and evidence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(6), 1033 1062. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.963
  28. Evans, W. N., Oates, W. E., & Schwab, R. M. (1992). Measuring peer group effects: A study of teenage behavior. The Journal of Political Economy, 100(5), 966-991. https://doi.org/10.1086/261848
  29. Farber, A., Huu Tu, N., Tran, D., & Vuong, Q. H. (2008). The financial storms in Vietnam's transition economy: A reasoning on the 1991-2008 period. Working Papers CEB, ULB.
  30. Fisher, S., Frazer, N. &Murray, K. (1986). Homesickness and health in boarding school children. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 6(1), 35 47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(86)80033-0
  31. Fowler, M. G., Davenport, M. G., & Garg, R. (1992). School functioning of US children with asthma. Pediatrics, 90(6), 939-944.
  32. Gibbons, S., Silva, S., & Weinhardt, F. (2013). Everybody needs good neighbours? Evidence from students’ outcomes in England. The Economic Journal, 123(571), 831-874. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12025
  33. Gould, E., Lavy, V., & Paserman, S. D. (2009). Sixty years after the magic carpet ride: The long-run effect of the early childhood environment on social and economic outcomes. Review of Economic Studies, 78(3), 938-973. https://doi.org/10.3386/w14884
  34. Hanushek, E. A. (1997). Assesing the effect of school resources on student performace: An update. Educational Evoluation and Policy Analysis, 19(2), 141 164. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737019002141
  35. Hanushek, E. A. (1979). Conceptual and empirical issues in the estimation of educational production functions. Journal of Human Resources, 14(3), 351 88. https://doi.org/10.2307/145575
  36. Heck, R. H. (2009). Teacher effectiveness and student achievement: Investigating a multilevel cross-classified model. Journal of Education Administration, 7(22), 227-249. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230910941066
  37. Hopland, A. O. (2012). School Building Conditions and Student Achievement: Norwegian Evidence. Working Paper No. 2/2012, Department of Economics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
  38. Hoxby, C. M. (2000). Peer Effects in the Classroom: Learning from Gender and Race Variation, NBER Working Paper no. 7867, National Bureau of Economic Research.
  39. Hsieh, C. S., & Lin, X (2019), Social Interactions and Social Preferences in Social Networks, Working Paper.
  40. https://spatial-panels.com/software/, (15.06.2018)
  41. https://www.spatial-econometrics.com/, (15.06.2018)
  42. Huesman, R L. Jr, Brown, A. K., Lee, G., Kellogg, J. P., & Radcliffe, P. M. (2007). Modeling Student Academic Success: Does Usage of Campus Recreation Facilities Make a Difference?. Retrieved from the University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy, http://hdl.handle.net/11299/159766, (30.03.2017)
  43. Jensen, B., & Harris, M. N. (2008). Neighbourhood measures: quantifying the effects of neighbourhood externalities. The Economic Record, 84(264), 68 81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.2008.00447.x
  44. Johnson, R. C., Nagoshi, C. T., Ahren, F. M., Wilson, J. R., DeFries, J. C., & McClearn, G. E. (1983). Family background, cognitive ability, and personality as predictors of educational and occupational attainment. Social Biology, 30(1), 86 100. https://doi.org/10.1080/19485565.1983.9988519
  45. Kang, C. (2007). Does Money Matter? The Effect of Private Educational Expenditures on Academic Performance, Departmental Working Papers, National University of Singapore, Department of Economics.
  46. Karweit, N., & Slavin, R. E. (1981). Measurement and Modelling Choices in Studies of Time and Learning. American Educational Research Journal, 18(2), 157 171. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312018002157
  47. Lavy, V., & Schlosser, A. (2011). Mechanisms and impacts of gender peer effects at school. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 3(2), 1 33. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.3.2.1
  48. LeSage, J. P. (2014). Spatial econometric panel data model specification: A Bayesian approach. Spatial Statistics, 9, 122-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spasta.2014.02.002
  49. LeSage, J. P., & Pace, K. (2014). The Biggest Myth in Spatial Econometrics. Econometrics, 2 (4), 217–249. https://doi.org/10.3390/econometrics2040217
  50. LeSage, J. P. (2015). Software for Bayesian cross section and panel spatial model comparison. Journal of Geographical Systems, 17(4), 297-310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-015-0217-3
  51. MacGowenn, R. S. (2007). The Impact of School Facilities on Student Achievement, Attendance, Behavior, Completion Rate and Teacher Turnover Rate in Selected Texas High Schools, PhD Thesis, Texas A&M Universities.
  52. Manski, C. F. (2000). Economic analysis of social interactions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 115-136. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.14.3.115
  53. Manski, C. M. (1993). Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Review of Economic Studies, 60(3), 531-542. https://doi.org/10.2307/2298123
  54. Matlock, K., Song, J. J. & Goering, C. Z. (2014). Spatial dependency and contextual effects on academic achievement, International Journal of Educational Administration and Policy Studies, 6(3), 32-42. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJEAPS2013.0327
  55. Mayer, S., & Jencks, C. (1989). Growing up in poor neighborhoods: How much does it matter? Science, 243(4897), 1441–1445. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.243.4897.1441
  56. Maylor, U., Glass, K., Issa, T, Kuyok, K. A., Minty, S. Rose, Anthea. Ross, Alistair, Tanner, E., Finch, S., Low, N., Taylor, E., Tipping, S., Purdon, (2010). Impact of Supplementary Schools on Pupils’ Attainment: An Investigation into what Factors Contribute to Educational Improvements, Research Reports, London: DSCF, (12.07.2018)
  57. Mizruchi, M. S., & Neuman, E. J. (2008). The effect of density on the level of bias in the network autocorrelation model. Social Networks, 30(3), 190 200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2008.02.002
  58. Moffitt, R. A. (2001). Policy Interventions, Low-level Equilibria, and Social Interactions, in Social Dynamics, edited by S. Durlauf and P. Young. MIT Press.
  59. Murillo, F. J., & Román, M. (2011). School infrastructure and resources do matter: analysis of the incidence of school resources on the performance of Latin American students. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 22(1), 29 50. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2010.543538
  60. Needham, B. L., Crosnoe, R., & Muller, C. (2004). Academic failure in secondary school: The inter-related role of health problems and educational context. Social Problems, 51(4), 569-586. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2004.51.4.569
  61. Niehaus, K., Rudasill, K. M., & Rakes, C. R. (2012). A longitudinal study of school connectedness and academic outcomes across sixth grade. Journal of School Psychology, 50(4), 443-460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2012.03.002
  62. O’Neill, D., & Oates, A. (2001). The impact of school facilities on student achievement, behavior, attendance, and teacher turnover rate in central texas middle schools. Educational Facility Planner, 36(3), 14-22.
  63. Paelinck, J., & Klaassen, L. (1979). Spatial Econometrics. Saxon House.
  64. Parke, M. (2003). Are Married Parents Really Better for Children? What Research Says About The Effects of Family Structure On Child Well-Being. Research Paper, Center for Law and Social Policy.
  65. Reardon, S. F. (2011). The Widening Socioeconomic Status Achievement Gap: New Evidence and Possible Explanations. In Whither opportunity? Rising Inequality and the Uncertain Life Chances of Low-Income Children, R. J. Murnane and G. J. Duncan (Eds.), Russell Sage Foundation.
  66. Shapson, S. M., Wright, E. N., Eason, G., & Fitzgerald, J. (1980). An experimental study of the effects of class size. American Educational Research Journal, 17(2), 141-152. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312017002141
  67. Shaw, S. R., Gomes, P., Polotskaia, A. & Jankowska, A. M. (2015). The relationship between student health and academic performance: Implications for school psychologists. School Psychology International, 36(2), 115-134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034314565425
  68. Spernak, S. M., Schottenbauer, M. A., Ramey, S. L., & Ramey, C. T. (2006). Child health and academic achievement among former head start children. Children and Youth Services Review, 28(10), 1251-1261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2006.01.006
  69. Stakhovych, A., & Bijmolt, T. H. A. (2009). Specification of spatial models: A simulation study on weights Matrices. Regional Science, 88(2), 389-408. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2008.00213.x
  70. Stipek, D. (1998). Motivations to Learn: From Theory to Practice. 4th edition, Allyn and Bacon.
  71. Sykes, B. (2009). Spatial Order and Social Position: Neighbourhoods, Schools and Educational Inequalit. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research
  72. Sykes, B., & Kuyper, H. (2009). Neighbourhood effects on youth educational achievement in the netherlands: Can effects be identified and do they vary by student background characteristics?. Environment and Planning A, 41, 2417 2436. https://doi.org/10.1068/a41255
  73. Tansel, A., & Bircan, F. (2006). Demand for education in Turkey: A Tobit Analysis of Private Tutoring Expenditures in Turkey. Economics of Education Review, 25, 303-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2005.02.003
  74. Tansel, A. (2002). Determinants of Schooling Attainment for boys and girls in Turkey. Economics of Education Review, 21(5), 455-470. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7757(01)00028-0
  75. Tansel, A., (2013). Supplemantary Education in Turkey: Recent Developments and Future Prospects, Koç University-TUSIAD Economic Research Forum Working Paper Series.
  76. Todd, P. E., & Wolpin, K. I. (2003). On the specification and estimation of the production function for cognitive achievement. Economic Journal, 113(485), F3-F33. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00097
  77. Wang, J., & Li, B. (2018). Supplementary education, student development and education equity: Evidence from primary schools in Beijing-China. Education Economics, 26(5), 459-487. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2018.1460653
  78. Way, N., Reddy, R., & Rhodes, J. (2007). Students' perceptions of school climate during the middle school years: Associations’ with trajectories of psychological and behavioral adjustment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 40, 194 213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-007-9143-y
  79. Weinhart, F. (2014). Social housing, neighborhood quality and student performance. Journal of Urban Economics, 82, 12-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2014.06.001
  80. Winship, C., Harding, D. J., Gennetian, L., Sanbonmatsu, L., & Kling, J. (2011). Unpacking Neighborhood Influences on Education Outcomes: Setting the Stage for Future Research. In: Opportunity? Rising Inequality, Schools and Children’s Life Chances; Edited by Duncan G and Whither, M. R.
  81. Yaylalı, M., Kızıltan, A., Oktay, E., Doğan, E. M., Özer, H., Naralan, A., Özen, Ü., Özçomak, M. S., Akan, Y., & Aktürk, E. (2006). Üniversite Gençliğinin Gelir-Harcama Kalıpları Araştırması. [Survey of Income-Spending Patterns of University Students]. Ataturk University Publication, Erzurum
  82. Yesilyurt, M. E., & Say, D. (2016). Factors affecting success of high school students in Turkey. Ege Academic Review, 16(3), 541-554.
  83. Yesilyurt, M. E., & Elhorst, J. P. (2017). Impacts of neighboring countries on military expenditures: A dynamic spatial panel approach. Journal of Peace Research, 54(6), 777-790. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343317707569
  84. Yeşilyurt, M. E., Karadeniz, O., Gülel, F. E., Çağlar, A., & Kangallı-Uyar, S. G. (2016). Türkiye’de İllere Göre Ortalama ve Beklenen Okullaşma Yılı, [Mean and expected years of schooling for provinces in Turkey]. Pamukkale Journal of Eurasian Socioeconomics Studies, 3(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.5505/pjess.2016.55706
  85. Yeşilyurt, F., Koçak, H., & Yeşilyurt, M. E. (2020). Factors Determining the Development of Minimum Comparable Areas and Spatial Interaction. Submitted.
  86. Zangger, C. (2016), The Spatial Structure of Educational Achievement, Researchgate.net.
  87. Zavarrone, E., & Vitali, A. (2012). School Performance and Network Effects among Classmates. Population Association of America 2012 Annual Meeting.
  88. Zimmerman, D. J. (2003). Peer effects in academic outcomes: evidence from a natural experiment. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(1), 9 23. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465303762687677