KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2013 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2

Rusmanizah USTATI Language Department IPGM Kampus Pendidikan Teknik, Bandar Enstek, MALAYSIA

Distance Learning Students’ Need: Evaluating Interactions From Moore’s Theory Of Transactional Distance

Rusmanizah USTATI
Sharifah Sariah Syed HASSAN
Sayfa
292–304
Yayın Tarihi
2013-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This study aspires to provide insights on the significance of interactions from distance learners’ perception.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study draws on the experience from a focus group interviews under the distance learning programme known as Program Pensiswazahan Guru (PPG) organized by the Malaysian Ministry of Education in collaboration with local universities and institutes of education.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Its purpose is to uncover students’ perception about the platform used by International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) which is the Learning Management System (LMS).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This study aspires to provide insights on the significance of interactions from distance learners’ perception.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Distance Learning · Theory of Transactional Distance · Student-Teacher Interaction

Abstract

This study draws on the experience from a focus group interviews under the distance learning programme known as Program Pensiswazahan Guru (PPG) organized by the Malaysian Ministry of Education in collaboration with local universities and institutes of education. Its purpose is to uncover students’ perception about the platform used by International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) which is the Learning Management System (LMS). LMS is a vital instructional medium especially for the varsity distant learners. Michael Moore’s Theory of Transactional Distance is used as the guiding framework to gain insights on learning and interactions in this e-learning setting. Teacher-student interactions are analyzed for better understanding of the phenomena under study. The findings indicate that in terms of usability LMS is perceived as a good platform to acquire information on content and to receive feedback from instructors. However, IIUM learners hope for more interactivity where learners can communicate amongst themselves beside engaging with the instructor-learner- content interactions that they currently experience via the system. This study aspires to provide insights on the significance of interactions from distance learners’ perception.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

USTATI, R., HASSAN, S. S. S. (2013). Rusmanizah USTATI Language Department IPGM Kampus Pendidikan Teknik, Bandar Enstek, MALAYSIA. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2, 292–304. https://ajindex.com/articles/141071

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (7)

  1. Giossos,Y. Mauroidis, H. and Koutsouba, M. (2008). Research in distance education: review and perspectives. Open Education – The Journal for Open ad Distance Education and Educational Technology. 4 (1). Retrieved December 8, 2012, from http://www.opennet.gr/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=Itemid=28
  2. Fox, M. (2003). Learning design and e-learning. Brighton: Epic Group plc. Retrieved December 8, 2012, from www.dokeos.com/doc/thirdparty/Epic_Whtp_learningdesign.pdf McIsaac, M.S. and Gunawardena, C.N. (1996). Distance Education. in D.H. Jonassen, ed. Handbook of research for educational communications and technology: a project of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology. (pp. 403-407). New York: Simon &Schuster Macmillan. Moore, M. G. (1972). Learner autonomy: The second dimension of independent learning. Convergence, 5(2), 76-88.
  3. Moore, M. G. (1973). Towards a theory of independent learning and teaching. Journal of Higher Education, 44(9), 661-679.
  4. Moore, M. G. (1980).
  5. Independent study. In R. D. Boyd, Apps, J. W., & Associates (Eds). Redefining the discipline of adult education. (Vol. 5, pp.16-31). San Francisco: Jossey- Bass. Moore, M. G. (1984). On a theory of independent study. In D. Stewart, D. Keegan & B. Holemberg (Eds.) Distance education: International perspectives (pp. 68-94). London: Routledge. Moore, M. G. (1993).Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.) Theoretical principles of distance education (Vol. 1, pp. 22-38). London: Routledge. Moore, J. L. (2011). “E-learning, online learning, and distance learning.” Retrieved December 8, 2012, from https://scholar.vt.edu/access/./eLearning%Scott%Midkiff.pdf
  6. Ravenscroft, A. (2001). Designing E-learning Interactions in the 21st Century: revisiting and rethinking the role of theory. European Journal of Education, 36 (2). 133-156.
  7. Rosenberg, M. J. (2001). E-learning: Strategies for Delivering Knowledge in the Digital Age. New York: McGraw-Hill Professional. Starr-Glass, D. (2012). Learners’ Perception of Distance in an online course: Revisiting Moore’s Theory of Transactional Distance. Retrieved December 8, 2012, from www.umuc.edu/ctl/upload/Starr-Glass_paper.pdf Schunk, D. H. (2009). Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective. (5th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education International.