KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2019 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 3

The Comparison of Trust in Virtual and Face-To-Face Collaborative Learning Teams

Meltem Huri BATURAY
Sacip TOKER
Sayfa
153–164
Yayın Tarihi
2019-07-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The initial level of trust should be taken into consideration by instructors or managers before forming groups.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The study investigates the effect of delivery types of (virtual and face-to-face) collaborative learning environments on the development of trust among group members in a graduate course.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:It comprised a total of 64 participants – 21 in the face-to-face group, and 43 in the virtual group.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The initial level of trust should be taken into consideration by instructors or managers before forming groups.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2010 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Trust · face-to-face communication · e-learning

Abstract

The study investigates the effect of delivery types of (virtual and face-to-face) collaborative learning environments on the development of trust among group members in a graduate course. For this aim, a quasi-experimental, non-equivalent group comparison was used. It comprised a total of 64 participants – 21 in the face-to-face group, and 43 in the virtual group. Study participants were comprised of students registered in a course entitled ‘Web-based Education: Principles of Design and Implementation’ in the spring semester as part of either a virtual or traditional face-to-face graduate program in Information Systems at an institute of higher education in Turkey in 2010. Trust levels were measured at two different occasions, namely in the beginning and end of the semester, for both study groups. The participants completed a web-based course material design project as a collaborative group activity. The results indicate that trust increases over time among virtual participants, but declines among face-to-face participants. While levels of trust among virtual course participants are lower than those of face-to-face course participants in the beginning of the semester, trust levels of virtual participants surpass those of face-to-face participants by the end of the semester. This study demonstrates that trust can develop in virtual learning environments. The initial level of trust should be taken into consideration by instructors or managers before forming groups.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BATURAY, M. H., TOKER, S. (2019). The Comparison of Trust in Virtual and Face-To-Face Collaborative Learning Teams. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 3, 153–164. https://ajindex.com/articles/141025

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Anderson, A. H., McEwan, R., Bal, J., & Carletta, J. (2007). Virtual team meetings: An analysis of communication and context. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2558–2580.
  2. Bos, N., Olson, J., Gergle, D., Olson, G., & Wright, Z. (2002). Effects of four computer-mediated communications channels on trust development. Proc. CHI 2002, ACM Press, pp. 135-140.
  3. Cheng, X., Nolan, T., & Macaulay, L. (2013). Don’t give up the community: a viewpoint of trust development in online collaboration. Information Technology & People, 26(3), 298-318.
  4. Coppola, N.W., Hiltz, S.R & Rotter, N. (2004). Building trust in virtual teams. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 4, 95 – 104. Crossman, A., & Lee-Kelley, L. (2004). Trust, commitment and team working: The paradox of virtual organizations. Global Networks, 4 (4), 375-390. 163 Crowe, P., Collins, M., Larue, O., Green, R., Hough, A., & Juvina, I. (2017, September). Examining the Role of Trust in Peer-Assisted Learning. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 61, No. 1, pp. 165-169). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications. De Meo, P., Messina, F., Rosaci, D., & Sarné, G. M. (2017). Combining trust and skills evaluation to form e-Learning classes in online social networks. Information Sciences, 405, 107-122.
  5. Field, A. (2005). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS: And Sex, Drugs, and Rock’n’ Roll (2nd ed.). Sage Publications: London. Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2000). How to design and evaluate research in education New York: McGraw. Fransen, J. Kirschner, P.A. & Erkens, G. (2011). Mediating team effectiveness in the context of collaborative learning: The importance of team and task awareness. Computers in Human Behavior 27(3): 1103- 1113. Fransen, J., Weinberger, A., & Kirschner, P. (2013). Team effectiveness and team development in CSCL. Educational Psychologist, 48, 9–24.
  6. Gerdes, A. (2010). Revealing preconditions for trustful collaboration in CSCL. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5, 345-353.
  7. Handy, C. (1995). Trust and the virtual organization. Harvard Business Review, 73, 40-50. Isohätälä, J., Järvenoja, H., & Järvelä, S. (2017). Socially shared regulation of learning and participation in social interaction in collaborative learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 81, 11-24.
  8. Jannsen, J., Erkens, G. & Kirschner, P. A. (2010). Group awareness tools: It’s what you do with it that matters. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1046-1058.
  9. Johnson, B.