Dergiler / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2011 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 2

Key Factors For Determining Student Satisfaction In Distance Learning Courses: A Study Of Allama Iqbal Open University (Aiou) Islamabad, Pakistan

Sayfa
114–127
Yayın Tarihi
2011-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Moreover, the faculty at AIOU is delivering distance learning courses that meet the students' needs in regard to students-instructor interaction, instructor performance and course evaluation.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this paper, the primary objective of the research team was to find out the relationship between student satisfaction and the following variables of the distance learning environment: instructors' performance, course evaluation and student-instructor interaction.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The sample consisted of 245 students of Allama Iqbal Open University of Pakistan.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Moreover, the faculty at AIOU is delivering distance learning courses that meet the students' needs in regard to students-instructor interaction, instructor performance and course evaluation.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Distance Learning · Course Evaluation · Instructor Performance

Abstract

In this paper, the primary objective of the research team was to find out the relationship between student satisfaction and the following variables of the distance learning environment: instructors' performance, course evaluation and student-instructor interaction. The sample consisted of 245 students of Allama Iqbal Open University of Pakistan. The purpose of this study was to address the most recent problem of AIOU students relevant to their distance learning. The problem was that most of the people in Pakistan perceived distance learning as poorer quality. Therefore, the researchers conducted this study to find out whether it's only people perception or there is any thing in reality about the poorer outcome of the distance learning students as compare to traditional students. By using correlation, regression and descriptive analysis, it was found that just like the traditional education, in distance learning education at AIOU, enough interaction take place between students and their instructors, courses are up to date and well designed, instructors are devoted, motivated and equipped with the required skill and knowledge. Moreover, the faculty at AIOU is delivering distance learning courses that meet the students' needs in regard to students-instructor interaction, instructor performance and course evaluation.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ALI, A., RAMAY, M. I., SHAHZAD, M. (2011). Key Factors For Determining Student Satisfaction In Distance Learning Courses: A Study Of Allama Iqbal Open University (Aiou) Islamabad, Pakistan. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 2, 114–127. https://ajindex.com/articles/140791

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Allen, M., Bourhis, J., Burrell, N., & Mabry, E. (2002). Comparing student satisfaction with distance education to traditional classrooms in higher education: a meta- analysis. American Journal of Distance Education, 16(2), 83-97
  2. Anderson, T. D., & Garrison, D. R. (1995). Transactional issues in distance education: The impact of design in audio teleconferencing. The American Journal of Distance Education, 9, 27–45. Andria Y., & Chari N. (2006). “Assessing the quality of online courses from the students' perspective”. Internet and Higher Education, 9, 107–115
  3. Arbaugh, J. B. (2000a). Virtual classroom characteristics and student satisfaction with internet-based MBA courses. Journal of Management Education, 24, 32-54
  4. Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Banerjee, M., & Brinckerhoff, L. C. (2002). Assessing Student Performance in Distance Education Courses: Implications for Testing Accommodations for Students with Learning Disabilities. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 27(3), 25-35
  5. Bartley, S. J., & Golek, J. H. (2004). Evaluating the Cost Effectiveness of Online and Face-to-Face Instruction. Educational Technology & Society, 7 (4), 167-175.
  6. Beaudoin, M. (1990). The instructor’s changing role in distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 4(2), 26–34.
  7. Belanger, F., & Jordan, D. H. (2000). Evaluation and implementation of distance learning: Technologies, tools and techniques. Hershey, PA: Idea Publishing Group. Collis, B. (1995), Anticipating the impact of multimedia in education: lessons from the literature, Computers in Adult Education and Training, 2(2), 136-49.
  8. Conrad, D. (2006). E-Learning and Social Change: An Apparent Contradiction. InM. Beaudoin (Ed.), Perspectives on higher education in the digital age, New York: Nova Science Publishers. 21-33
  9. DeBourgh, G. A. (1999). Technology is the tool, teaching is the task: Student satisfaction in distance learning. Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference, 131-137
  10. Du, J., Havard, B., & Li, H. (2005). Dynamic online discussion: Task-oriented interaction for deep learning. Educational Media International, 42(3), 207-218.
  11. Durling, D., Cross, N., & Johnson, J. (1996). CAI with style. Paper presented at the th Annual Design Conference-Computer-aided Design Education (University of Bristol, England, June 26-27, 1997).
  12. Fredericksen, E., Pickett, A., Shea, P., Pelz, W.,