Dergiler / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2009 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2

NOTE FOR EDITOR: Study of Learning Styles and Their Roles In The Academic Achievement of The Students of Payame Noor University (PNU)

Sayfa
24–37
Yayın Tarihi
2009-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Students with logical and physical learning styles have the least academic achievement.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This paper reports on a research done to study learning styles and their roles in the academic achievement of the students of Payame Noor University (PNU), Ardebli center, Iran. 184 students (90 male and 94 female students) in the fourth semester are chosen as our sample using Cocran's formula and random sampling.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Reliability of this questionnaire is calculated as a=0.81 using Cronbach's alpha.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Students with logical and physical learning styles have the least academic achievement.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Learning Styles · Memletics · Distance Education

Abstract

This paper reports on a research done to study learning styles and their roles in the academic achievement of the students of Payame Noor University (PNU), Ardebli center, Iran. 184 students (90 male and 94 female students) in the fourth semester are chosen as our sample using Cocran's formula and random sampling. The questionnaire memletics is used to collect data about learning styles. Reliability of this questionnaire is calculated as a=0.81 using Cronbach's alpha. Total average of students' scores in four semesters is taken as a criterion for academic achievement. Findings show that most of male students use verbal and solitary learning styles. Most of female student use aural and verbal learning styles. The academic achievement of female students is more than the academic achievement of male students. Among the students of Payame Noor University, those who use visual learning style have the greatest achievement. Students with social, aural, verbal, and solitary learning styles are in the following ranks respectively. Students with logical and physical learning styles have the least academic achievement.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KIA, M. M., ALIAPOUR, A., GHADERI, E. (2009). NOTE FOR EDITOR: Study of Learning Styles and Their Roles In The Academic Achievement of The Students of Payame Noor University (PNU). Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2, 24–37. https://ajindex.com/articles/140750

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Abdollahpour, M., Kadivar, P. & Abdollahi, M. (2005). Study of relationship between cognitive and metacognitive strategies and academic achievement. Psychological Researches, 8, (3, 4), 30-44.
  2. Anderson, T. & Elloumi, F. (Eds.). (2004). Theory and practice of online learning. Athabasca, CA: Athabasca University. Bostrom, R. P., Olfman, L., & Sein, M. K. (1993).Learning styles and end- user training: A first step. MIS Quarterly, 17(3), 118-120.
  3. Boud, D. & Griffin, V. (1987). Appreciating adults learning: from the learner's Perspective. London, England: Kogan Page. Claxan, C. S. & Murrell, P. H. (1988).
  4. Learning Styles. Washington, DC: ERTC Clearing House on Higher Education. Desai, M. S. (1996). Longitudinal study to assess the impact of instructor–based training versus computer based training on user performance: Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education. 6(2). http://www. tojde.anadolu.edu.tr. Retrieved July19, 2007.
  5. Dwyer, K.K. (1998).Communication apprehension and learning style performance: Correlation and implication for teaching. Communication Education, 17(2).137- 148. Goold, A. & Rimmer, R. (2000). Factors affecting performance in first-year computing. SIGCSE Bulletin, 32(2), 39-43.
  6. Grasha, A. F. (1996).
  7. Teaching with style. Pittsburgh, PA: Alliance. Griggs, S. A. (1991a). Counseling gifted children with different learning-style preferences counselors and parents. R. M. Milgram. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation. --------------(1991b). Learning styles counseling. ERIC Digest. ERIC Clearinghouse on Counseling and Personnel Services. Ann Arbor, MI: 3. Homayooni, A. & Abdollahi, M. (2003). Study of relationship between learning styles and cognitive styles and their effect on the academic achievement of students. Psychology journal. 7 (2), 179-196.
  8. Keefe, J. W. & Ferrell, B. G. (1990). Developing a defensible learning style Paradigm. Educational leadership, 2, 57-61.
  9. Lindsay, E.K. (1999).An analysis of matches of teaching style and the uses of education technology. The American Journal of Distance Education, 13(2), 113-119.
  10. Montgomery, S. & Grout, L. (1998). Student learning styles and their implications for teaching. Michigan: Centre for Research on Learning and Teaching (CRLT), University of Michigan. Murphy, K. L. (1992). Sociocultural context of interaction in Turkish distance learning:Implications for distance education teaching. In C. Dillon (Ed.), Proceedings of theFirst Forum on the Teaching of Distance Education, Norman, OK: