KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2009 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1

Students’ Attitudes Towards Webct Applications In Selected Courses

Mehpare TOKAY ARGAN
Sayfa
47–56
Yayın Tarihi
2009-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The results of this research have significant implications for both the web-based learning as a whole, and it would be a contribution to relatively limited literature on the attitudes towards WebCT enhanced courses in Turkey.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:WebCT is one of the widely used web-based learning tools.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:For enriching teaching and learning courses at tertiary level, WebCT emerges as an important tool.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The results of this research have significant implications for both the web-based learning as a whole, and it would be a contribution to relatively limited literature on the attitudes towards WebCT enhanced courses in Turkey.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Edutainment · Entertainment · Marketing Education

Abstract

WebCT is one of the widely used web-based learning tools. For enriching teaching and learning courses at tertiary level, WebCT emerges as an important tool. This paper describes attitudes of students at Anadolu University towards WebCT applications in selected courses. Furthermore, the study describes the attitudes of a sample of students towards WebCT and analyzes data to determine the effect of WebCT dimensions on satisfaction, course advising, and course preference on their overall perception and referral of a course. The findings indicate the emergence of four WebCT dimensions. These factors are access and interaction, learning experience, time and compensation, and exam and exercise. The dimensions are positively associated with satisfaction, course advising, and course preference. The results of this research have significant implications for both the web-based learning as a whole, and it would be a contribution to relatively limited literature on the attitudes towards WebCT enhanced courses in Turkey.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ARGAN, M. T. (2009). Students’ Attitudes Towards Webct Applications In Selected Courses. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 47–56. https://ajindex.com/articles/140717

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Aikem, M., Vanjani, M., Ray, B. and Martin, J. (2003). College Students Internet Use. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 20 (5), 182-185.
  2. Carswell, A. D., and Venkatesh, V. (2002). Learner outcomes in an asynchronous distance education environment. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 56, 475– Chiu, C. M.,and Wang, E. T. G. (2008). Understanding Web-based learning continuance intention: The role of subjective task values. Information & Management, 45, 194-201.
  3. Clark, J. (2002). A product review of WebCT. Internet and Higher Education 5, 79-82.
  4. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13 (3), 319-340.
  5. Fletcher, K. M. (2005). Self-efficacy as an evaluation measure for programs in support of online learning literacies for undergraduates. Internet and Higher Education, 8, 307-322.
  6. Gegez, A. E. (2005). Pazarlama Arastirmalari. Istanbul: Beta. Hightower, B. Rawl, C. and Schutt, M. (2008). Collaborations for delivering the library to students through WebCT. Reference Services Review, 35 (4), 541-551.
  7. Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The implication of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20: 141-151.
  8. Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrics, 39, 31-36.
  9. Kim, S. S., Lee, C. K., and Klenosky, D. B. (2003). The influence push and pull factors at Korean national parks. Tourism Management, 24, 169-180.
  10. Kraemer, E.W. (2003). Developing the Online Learning Environment: The Pros and Cons of Using WebCT for Library Instruction. Information Technology and Libraries, 22 (2), 92. Lee, J. and MacMillan, D. (2004). Evolving instruction in biology: using the web to improve in-class instruction. Reference Services Review, 32 (4), 374-382.
  11. Lu, J., Yu, C. S., and Liu, C. (2003). Learning style, learning patterns, and learning performance in a WebCT-based MIS. Information & Management, 40(6), 497-507.
  12. Morss, D.A. (1999). A study of student perspectives on Web-based learning: WebCT in the classroom. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 9 (5), 408. Ngai, E. W. T., Poon, J. K. L., and Chan, Y.H.C. (2007). Empirical examination of the adoption of WebCT using TAM. Computers & Education, 48, 250-267.
  13. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hall. Romanova, K. and Nevgi, A. (2006). Learning outcomes in medical informatics: Comparison of a WebCT course with ordinary web sit