Dergiler / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2009 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1

Students’ Opinions On Blended Learning

Sayfa
21–35
Yayın Tarihi
2009-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

While analyzing the responses of students who had high success level was more favorable, it was observed that the frequency of participation to the forum pages did not affect the students’ answers.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:E-learning was acknowledged by most educators and researchers as a savior, even an only alternative in education field, especially in the following years of its emergence.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:For the research, blended learning was implemented within the frame of Special Teaching Methods course. 20 students who attended to the course constituted the working group.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:While analyzing the responses of students who had high success level was more favorable, it was observed that the frequency of participation to the forum pages did not affect the students’ answers.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Blended Learning · Face-to-Face Learning · e-Learning

Abstract

E-learning was acknowledged by most educators and researchers as a savior, even an only alternative in education field, especially in the following years of its emergence. However, with the rise of its limitations, the idea of bringing face-to-face learning and e-learning together to complete each other has occured. Blended learning is a method emerged as a result of this sentiment. The new education alternatives which have been discovered as a consequence of the researches and the studies may seem so engrossing but the crucial points are the consequences derived by implementations and the opinions of the students about them. For this purpose, a survey was carried out at Hacettepe University, Education Faculty, and Biology Education Section. For the research, blended learning was implemented within the frame of Special Teaching Methods course. 20 students who attended to the course constituted the working group. A multiple-choice test of 54 questions was prepared to get students’ opinions and applied to them at the end of the semester. Thus, students’ opinions about the blended learning application were acquired; besides, the opinions in accordance with achievement level and forum page’s frequency of participation in the internet site which is prepared for blended learning application were analyzed. According to the mean () and the standard deviation (ss) that was obtained from the analysis of students’ responses given to the questions, it was determined that the students’ views about the application of blended learning are quite favorable. While analyzing the responses of students who had high success level was more favorable, it was observed that the frequency of participation to the forum pages did not affect the students’ answers.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BALCI, M., SORAN, H. (2009). Students’ Opinions On Blended Learning. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 21–35. https://ajindex.com/articles/140702

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (6)

  1. Akkoyunlu, B., & Soylu, M. (2006). A study on students‘ views on blended learning Environment. Turkish, Online Journal of Distance Education- TOJDE, 7, 43-56.
  2. Alkan, C. (1997). Eğitim Teknolojisi[Education Technology] (5. Baskı). Ankara:Anı yayincilik. Bersin & Associatess, (2003).Blended learning: what works? An industry study of the strategy, implementation, and impact of blended learning. Oakland, CA: Bersin & Associates. Bonk, C. J. (Ed). & Graham, C.R.(Ed). (2006). Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. San Fransisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing. Bottino, R. M., Forcheri, P., & Molfino, M. T. (1998). Technology transfer in schools: From research to innovation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 29, 163-172.
  3. Chen, A., Mashadi, A., Ang, D., & Harkrider, N. (1999). Cultural issues in design of technology-enchanced learning systems. British Journal of Educational Technology, 30, 217-230.
  4. Clark, R. T., & Meyer,R. E. (2003). E-learning and the science of instruction. San Fransisco, CA: Preiffer Publishing. Dziuban, C. D., Hartman, J.L., Moskal, P. D. (2004). Blended learning. EDUCAUSE Central for Applied Research,2004(7). Frederick, H. H. (2007). Blended learning in entrepreneurship education in the asia- pasific: A grounded theory approach to entrepreneurship padagogy: Small Enterprise Conference, Manukau City, New Zelland. Fung, H. N. & Yuen, A. H. K. (2006). Utilization of e-learning technology in higher education. International Journal of Cases on Electronic Commerce, 2(2) Graham, C. R., Allen, S., & Ure, D. (2003). Blended learning environments: A review of the research literature.Unpublished manuscript, Provo, UT. Islam, K. (2002). Is e-learning floundering? E-learning: enterprise learning and knowledge management strategies, May 1. Kent, T. W. and McNergney, R. F. 1998. Will technology really change education? From blackboard to web (1st ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  5. Masie, E. (2002). Blended learning- The magic is in the mix,ASTD E-Learning Handbook, McGraw-Hill Professional, 58- 63. Molinari, D. (2003). The role of social comments in online problem solving groups. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT. Norton, S. & Irvin, J. (2007) Developing positive attitudes towards algebra. Mathematics: Essential Research, Essential Practice 2, 561-570
  6. Osguthorpe, R. T. & Graham, C. R. (2003), Blended learning environments: Definitions and directions. The Quarterly Review of Distance Educa