Dergiler / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2013 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 4

Web 2.0 Tools For Supporting Teaching

Sayfa
287–295
Yayın Tarihi
2013-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The aforementioned tools comprised the curriculum in a blended-learning professional development course for in-service teachers and attracted many favourable comments from the participants.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Web 2.0 tools provide enormous opportunities for teaching and learning, yet their application in education is still underdeveloped.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This paper introduces four Web 2.0 tools; Blogger, StripGenerator, Go!Animate, and Google Forms, that are free and easy to use, in an effort to motivate teachers with low technological skills in integrating them into their instruction practices.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The aforementioned tools comprised the curriculum in a blended-learning professional development course for in-service teachers and attracted many favourable comments from the participants.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Internet · Teachers · Comics

Abstract

Web 2.0 tools provide enormous opportunities for teaching and learning, yet their application in education is still underdeveloped. What is more, it is no longer possible for teachers to ignore such a technological advance, while they are expected to provide students with opportunities to take control of their learning. However, teachers are still reluctant with technology integration. This paper introduces four Web 2.0 tools; Blogger, StripGenerator, Go!Animate, and Google Forms, that are free and easy to use, in an effort to motivate teachers with low technological skills in integrating them into their instruction practices. The aforementioned tools comprised the curriculum in a blended-learning professional development course for in-service teachers and attracted many favourable comments from the participants.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KONSTANTINIDIS, A., THEODOSIADOU, D., PAPPOS, C. (2013). Web 2.0 Tools For Supporting Teaching. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 4, 287–295. https://ajindex.com/articles/140491

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Aksoy, G. (2013). Effect of Computer Animation Technique on Students' Comprehension of the "Solar System and Beyond" Unit in the Science and Technology Course. Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 3(1), 40-46.
  2. Ali, A. Z. M. & Madar, A. R. (2010). Effects of Segmentation of Instructional Animation in Facilitating Learning. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 2(2), 15-29.
  3. Anderson, P. (2007). What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education. Technical report, JISC, Retrieved from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/techwatch/tsw0701b.pdf
  4. Betrancourt, M. (2005). The animation and interactivity principles in multimedia learning. In Mayer, R.E. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Beyerbach, B. A., Walsh, C., & Vanatta, R. A. (2001). From teaching technology to using technology to enhance student learning: Preservice teachers’ changing perceptions of technology infusion. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9, 105-127.
  6. Cheal, C., Coughlin, J., & Moore, S. (Eds) (2012). Transformation in Teaching: Social Media: Strategies in Higher Education. Informing Science Press.
  7. Dancy, M. H. & Beichner, R. (2006). Impact of animation on assessment of conceptual understanding in physics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research (PRST-PER), 2, 1-7.
  8. Eisner, E. (1985).
  9. Comics and sequential art. Tamarac, FL: Poorhouse Press.
  10. Embi (2011). Web 2.0 Tools in Education: A Quick Guide. Malaysia: University Kebangsaan Malaysia. Retrieved from http://www.scribd.com/doc/58594601/Web-2-0-Tools-in Education-A-Quick-Guide-by-Mohamed-Amin-Embi Garcia, P., & Qin, J. (2007). Identifying the Generation Gap in Higher Education: Where Do the Differences Really Lie?. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 3(4). Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/104229
  11. Goebel, B. A. (2009). Comic relief: Engaging students through humor writing. English Journal, 78(6), 38-43.
  12. Kerawalla, L., Minocha, S., Kirkup, G. & Conole, G. (2009). Supporting student blogging in higher education. In: Hatzipanagos, Stylianos & Warburton, Steven (Eds). Handbook of research on social software and developing community ontologies. New York: Information Science Reference. Lip, P. C. H. (2008). Helping Technophobic Teachers Ease the Burden of Marking with Easy-to-Use Online Quizzes. International Journal of Cyber Society and Education, 1(2), 97- Luján-Mora, S., & de Juana-Espinosa, S. (2007). The Use of We