KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2012 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2

The Domains For The Multi-Criteria Decisions About E-Learning Systems

Murat Pasa UYSAL
Sayfa
198–211
Yayın Tarihi
2012-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Finally, an illustrative example is given to show that AHP is an effective MCDA method for E-learning-related decisions.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Developments in computer and information technologies continue to give opportunities for designing advanced E-learning systems while entailing objective and technical evaluation methodologies.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Design and development of E-learning systems require time-consuming and labor-intensive processes; therefore any decision about these systems and their analysis needs systematic and structured guidance to lead to better decisions.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Finally, an illustrative example is given to show that AHP is an effective MCDA method for E-learning-related decisions.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:E-learning · Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis

Abstract

Developments in computer and information technologies continue to give opportunities for designing advanced E-learning systems while entailing objective and technical evaluation methodologies. Design and development of E-learning systems require time-consuming and labor-intensive processes; therefore any decision about these systems and their analysis needs systematic and structured guidance to lead to better decisions. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) techniques are applicable in instructional technology-related research areas as well as in other academic disciplines. In this study, a conceptual domain model and a decision activity framework is proposed for E-learning systems. Instructional, technological, and administrative decision domains are included in this model. Finally, an illustrative example is given to show that AHP is an effective MCDA method for E-learning-related decisions.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

UYSAL, M. P. (2012). The Domains For The Multi-Criteria Decisions About E-Learning Systems. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2, 198–211. https://ajindex.com/articles/140488

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Belton, S., & Stewart, T. S. (2002). Multiple criteria decision analysis. An integrated approach. Kluwer Academic Publishers,
  2. Massachusetts. Chang, C-T., & Lin-T-C. (2009). Interval goal programming for s-shaped penalty function. European Journal of Operational Research, 9, pp. 9–20. Chao R-J., & Chen, Y-H. (2009). Evaluation of the criteria and effectiveness of distance e- learning with consistent fuzzy preference relations. Expert Systems with Applications 36, –10662. Clemen, R. T. (1996).
  3. Making hard decisions. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company. Ho, W., Xu, X., & Dey, P.K. (2010). Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research,, pp. 16–24.
  4. Giannoulis, C., & Ishizaka, A. (2010). A web-based decision support system with ELECTRE III for a personalized ranking of British universities. Decision Support Systems, 48, pp. –497. Lee, B-C., Yoon, J-O., & Lee I. (2008). Learners’ acceptance of e-learning in South Korea: Theories and results. Computers and Education, 53, 1320–1329.
  5. Liaw, S. S. (2008). Investigating students’ perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the blackboard system. Computers and Education, 51, 864–873.
  6. Kao, H.Y., Liu, M.C., Huang, C. L., & Chang, Y. C. (2009). E-learning systems evaluation with data envelopment analysis and Bayesian networks. 2009 Fifth International Joint Conference on INC, IMS and ID. IEEE DOI 10.1109/NCM.2009.28. Mendoza, G.A., & Martins., H. (2006). Multi-criteria decision analysis in natural resource management: a critical review of methods and new modelling paradigms. Forest Ecology and Management, 230, 1–22.
  7. Merrill L, M. D. (1996). Instructional transaction theory: An instructional design model based on knowledge objects. Retrieved February 3, 2011 from http://cito.byuh. edu/merril Ray, S. C. (2004). Data envelopment analysis: Theory and techniques for economics and operations research, Cambridge University Press,
  8. New York, NY. Shee, D. Y., & Wang, Y. (2008). Multi-criteria evaluation of the web-based e-learning system: A methodology based on learner satisfaction and its applications. Computers & Education, 50, 894–905.
  9. Shih M., Feng J., & Tsai C-C. (2008). Research and trends in the field of e-learning from to 2005: A content analysis of cognitive studies in selected journals. Computers & Education, 51, 955–967.
  10. Sun, P-C., Cheng H.K., & Finger G. (2009). Critic