KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2014 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 4

Students’ Perception And Behavior Of Academic Integrity: A Case Study Of A Writing Forum Activity

Visara EKAHITANOND
Sayfa
150–161
Yayın Tarihi
2014-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

As such, students should be informed more about what they can or cannot do in order not to commit academic dishonesty.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The use of online tools such as forum has helped instructors develop courses that are engaging and challenging.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Data were collected from 160 students enrolled in a fundamental English course who were assigned to post and respond to the topics in a forum.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:As such, students should be informed more about what they can or cannot do in order not to commit academic dishonesty.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Academic Integrity · Online Discussion · Learning Management System

Abstract

The use of online tools such as forum has helped instructors develop courses that are engaging and challenging. However, instructors want to ensure that all students maintain academic integrity when they were assigned to work in an online community. This paper investigated students’ perception and behavior of academic integrity in an online discussion forum. Data were collected from 160 students enrolled in a fundamental English course who were assigned to post and respond to the topics in a forum. A survey was administered to measure how students perceived ‘academic integrity’ as well as to investigate students’ experience of violating academic integrity. A semi-structured interview was further conducted with the involved participants to find out the reasons behind their performance. The findings revealed that students perceived some misconduct actions as not cheating, leading to behaviors of academic dishonesty. As such, students should be informed more about what they can or cannot do in order not to commit academic dishonesty.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

EKAHITANOND, V. (2014). Students’ Perception And Behavior Of Academic Integrity: A Case Study Of A Writing Forum Activity. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 4, 150–161. https://ajindex.com/articles/140421

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. This finding can be supported by what Bloodgood, Turnley and Mudrack (2010) stated in that students had academic dishonesty because they did not know they were copying. CONCLUSION Bai, H. (2009). Facilitating students’ critical thinking in online discussion: An instructor’s experience. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 8(2), 156-164.
  2. Bloodgood, J. M., Turnley, W.H., & Mudrack, P. E. (2010). Ethics instruction and the perceived acceptability of cheating. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 23-37.
  3. Brent, E., & Atkisson, C. (2011). Accounting for cheating: An evolving theory and emergent themes.Research in Higher Education, 52(6), 640-658.
  4. Chapelle, C. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition: Foundations forteaching, testing, and research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Chapman, K., & Lupton, R. (2004). Academic dishonesty in a global educational market: A comparison of Hong Kong and American university business students. The International Journal of Education Management, 18 (7), 425-35.
  6. Gallant, T. (2008). Moral panic: the contemporary context of academic integrity. ASHE Higher Education Report, 33 (5), 1-12.
  7. Gilbert, P., & Dabbagh, N. (2005). How to structure online discussion for meaningful discourse:A case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36, 5–18.
  8. Hard, S., Conway, J., & Moran, A. (2006). Faculty and college students’ beliefs about the frequency of student academic misconduct. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(6), 1058-1080.
  9. Iyer, R., & Eastman, J. (2006). Academic dishonesty: Are business students different from other college students? Journal of Education for Business, 82(2), 101-110.
  10. Kennedy, K., Nowak, S., Raghuraman, R., Thomas, J., & Davis, S. (2000). Academic dishonesty and distance learning: Student and faculty views. College Student Journal, 34(2), 309-314.
  11. Kwong, T., Ng, H., Mark, K., & Wong, E. (2010). Students' and faculty's perception of academic integrity in Hong Kong. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 27 (5), 341 – 355. Lee, C., & Wen, L. (2007). Academic dishonesty in higher education - a nationwide study in Taiwan. Higher Education, 54, 85-97.
  12. Lipponen, L. (2000). Towards knowledge building discourse: From facts to explanations in primary students’ computer mediated discourse. Learning Environments Research, 3, 179-1
  13. Mangan, K. (2006). Survey finds widespread cheating in MBA programs. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 53(6), A.44. Retrieved March 19, 2009, from ProQuest Education Journals