KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2012 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2

Leili MOSALANEJAD (Corresponding author) Nursing Department

NOTE FOR EDITOR: The Effect Of Virtual Versus Traditional Learning In Achieving Competency-Based Skills

Leili MOSALANEJAD
Sakine SHAHSAVARI
Saed Sobhanian
Mehdi DASTPAK
Sayfa
69–75
Yayın Tarihi
2012-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Results: In theoretical exam, the mean score in virtual teaching group was higher than traditional group (P

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:By rapid developing of the network technology, the internet-based learning methods are substituting the traditional classrooms making them expand to the virtual network learning environment.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Materials and methods: In this quasi-experimental study, 86 freshman nursing students were recruited.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Results: In theoretical exam, the mean score in virtual teaching group was higher than traditional group (P
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Competency-Based Education · Computer Simulations · Nursing.

Abstract

By rapid developing of the network technology, the internet-based learning methods are substituting the traditional classrooms making them expand to the virtual network learning environment. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of virtual systems on competency-based skills of first-year nursing students. Materials and methods: In this quasi-experimental study, 86 freshman nursing students were recruited. Nursing Fundamentals and Skills (including theoretical and practical credits) was decided as the teaching course. The theory and practical contents were taught in one group by conventional method (face to face teaching, demonstration on moulage) and for another by virtual simulation and interactive multimedia. The two groups were the same for the content being taught, the instructor and the final evaluation. Paired t-test and independent sample t-test was used for statistical analysis. Results: In theoretical exam, the mean score in virtual teaching group was higher than traditional group (P

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

MOSALANEJAD, L., SHAHSAVARI, S., Sobhanian, S., DASTPAK, M. (2012). Leili MOSALANEJAD (Corresponding author) Nursing Department. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2, 69–75. https://ajindex.com/articles/140411

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (7)

  1. Aggarwal, R., Grantcharov,T., Moorthy, K., Hance J.,& Darzi,A (2006) A competency- based virtual reality training curriculum for the acquisition of laparoscopic psychomotor skill, American Journal of Surgery,191(1), 128-133.
  2. Ashkeboussi, R (2001).A comparative analysis of learning experience in a traditional vs. virtual classroom setting, MAHE Journal,24, 5-21.
  3. Chehrzad, M., Shafiei pour, Z, Mirzaei.,M., & Kazemnejad, E (2004) Comparison between two methods: Objective structured clinical evaluation (OSCE) and traditional on nursing students' satisfaction, Journal of Guilan University of Medical Sciences,,8-13.
  4. D'Alessandro, D.M, Lewis,T. E.,&D'Alessandro,M.P.(2004). A pediatric digital storytelling system for third year medical students: the virtual pediatric patients, BMC Medical Education, 4:10. Engum, S.A., Jeffries mP., Fisher, L.(2003). Intravenous catheter training system: computer-based education versus traditional learning methods, American Journal of Surgery, 186(1), 67-74.
  5. Enriquez, A.G. (2010) Enhancing student performance using tablet computers, College Teaching,58(3), 77-84. Gobbi,M., Monger, E., Watkinson, G., Spencer, A., Weaver M, Lathlean J., &Bryant.S (2004) Virtual interactive practice: a strategy to enhance learning and competence in health care students, Studies in health technology and informatics,107(Pt 2), 874 Green, SM., Weaver, M., Voegeli,D., Fitzsimmons, D., Knowles, J., Harrison, M., &Shephard, K.(2006). The development and evaluation of the use of a virtual learning environment (Blackboard 5) to support the learning of pre-qualifying nursing students undertaking a human anatomy and physiology module, Nurse Education Today, 26(5), 388-395.
  6. Hansen, D.E.(2008).Knowledge transfer in online learning environments, Journal of Marketing Education,30(2), 93-105. Holubar,S.D., Hassinger, J.P., Dozois, E.J., Camp.,J.C., Farley,D.R., Fidler,J.L., Pawlina,W.,&Robb, R. A.(2009). Virtual pelvic anatomy and surgery simulator: an innovative tool for teaching pelvic surgical anatomy, Studies in health technology and informatics, 142,122-124. Ireland,J., Johnson, N., Adams, D., Eboh,W., &Mowatt, E.(2009). Blended learning in education: effects on knowledge and attitude, British Journal of Nursing, 18(2), 124 McKenzie, K., & Murray,A.(2010). E-learning benefits nurse education and helps shape students' professional identity, Nursing Times, 106(5), 17-19.
  7. Mitchell, E.A., Ryan, A., Carson,O.,& McCann,S.(2007). An e