KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2014 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 4

Representative Model Of The Learning Process In Virtual Spaces Supported By Ict

José CAPACHO
Sayfa
75–89
Yayın Tarihi
2014-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

These indicators will assess the process of virtual education not only in students but also in the virtual institution.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This paper shows the results of research activities for building the representative model of the learning process in virtual spaces (e-Learning).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The model integrates the society, Institution of Education, virtual training platform, virtual teacher and students, and finally the assessment of student learning in virtual learning spaces supported by ICT.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:These indicators will assess the process of virtual education not only in students but also in the virtual institution.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Virtual Education. ICTs · Virtual Learning Platforms · Process Virtual Learning

Abstract

This paper shows the results of research activities for building the representative model of the learning process in virtual spaces (e-Learning). The formal basis of the model are supported in the analysis of models of learning assessment in virtual spaces and specifically in Dembo´s teaching learning model, the systemic approach to evaluating virtual learning by Badrul H. Khan, and the Cybernetic model for evaluating virtual learning environments. The e-Learning model is systemic and of feedback by nature. The model integrates the society, Institution of Education, virtual training platform, virtual teacher and students, and finally the assessment of student learning in virtual learning spaces supported by ICT. The model consists of fourteen processes. Processes are defined taking into account the following dimensions: identification, academic, pedagogical, educational, formative, evaluative, assessment of virtual learning and technological. The model is fundamental to the management of e-learning supported by ICT, justified by the fact that it is an operative model of the teaching-learning process in virtual spaces. The importance of having an operative model in virtual education is to project the management and decision in virtual education. Then the operational, administrative and decision phases will allow the creation of a set of indicators. These indicators will assess the process of virtual education not only in students but also in the virtual institution.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

CAPACHO, J. (2014). Representative Model Of The Learning Process In Virtual Spaces Supported By Ict. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 4, 75–89. https://ajindex.com/articles/140408

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (5)

  1. Alkhattabi, M., Neagu, D. & Cullen, A. (2011). Assessing information quality of e-learning systems: a web mining approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 862–873. Beltrán, J. (1999). Indicadores de fgestión: Herramientas para lograr la competitividad. Santa Fé de Bogotá, Colombia: 3R Editores Ltda. Blagojević, M. & Micić, Ž. (2013). A web-based intelligent report e-learning system using data mining techniques. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 39(2), 465–474.
  2. Blunden, A. (2010). Interdisciplinary theory of activity.Boston, MA, USA: Brill Academic Publishers. Extraído el 11 de Febrero de 2014 http://site.ebrary.com/lib/unorte/Doc?id=10419831&ppg=161
  3. Cabuk, S., Taner & Cabuk, A., (2013). Accreditacion of online and distance learning programs: OnLine GIS education program experience. TOJDE, 14 (1), Article 20. Dembo, M. H. (1988). Applying Educational Psychology in the classroom. London: Longman. Dondi, C., Michela Moretti, M. & Nascimbeni, F. (2006). Quality of e-Learning: Negotiating a strategy, implementing a policy. In Ulf-Daniel E. & Jan M. P. (eds.), Handbook on quality and standardisation in E-Learnig Germany. Springer Flasdick, J, Michel, L & Amaury Legait, M. (2006). The maze of accreditation in European higher education. In Ulf-Daniel Ehler & Jan Martin Pawlowski (eds.), Handbook on quality and standardisation in E-Learnig (p. 51-63).
  4. Germany. Springer Garrison, D. R. (2011). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. New York, NY, Routledge. Hadzhikoleva, S., Hadzhikolev, E., Doneva, R., & Totkov, G. (2010). Web-based system for quality assessment of e-learning in higher education. In International research conference “Challenges for higher education and scientific researches in the state of crisis”, Bourgas. Hernández, E. (2002). Estándares y especificaciones de E-learning: ordenando el desorden. Extraído el 15 de Marzo, 2006, http://www.uv.es/ticape/docs/eduardo.pdf Jara & Mellar, (2010). Quality enhancement for e-learning courses: The role of student feedback. Computers & Education, 54,709-714. Extracted on April 22,2014 from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131509003066
  5. Khan, B. (2005). Managing E-Learning: Design, delivery, implementation and evaluation. Hershey, United States of America: Editorial Information Science Publishing. Lai, Y. C., & Ng, E. M. (2011). Using wikis to develop student teachers’ learning, teaching, and assessment capabilities. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(1