Dergiler / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2013 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 4

Asist. Prof. Dr. Dilek ALTUNAY Mustafa Kemal University, Faculty of Science & Literature, English Language & Literature

Language Learning Activities Of Distance Efl Learners In The Turkish Open Education System As The Indicator Of Their Learner Autonomy

Sayfa
296–307
Yayın Tarihi
2013-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The article also includes suggestions for teaching and future research.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Öz This study investigates the noncompulsory language learning activities performed by a group of distance EFL learners in the Turkish Open Education System.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Performance of these activities has been considered as an indicator of their learner autonomy.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The article also includes suggestions for teaching and future research.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Anahtar Kelimeler Autonomy · Distance EFL Learners · Language Learning

Özet

Öz This study investigates the noncompulsory language learning activities performed by a group of distance EFL learners in the Turkish Open Education System. Performance of these activities has been considered as an indicator of their learner autonomy. The data were collected through an online questionnaire and interviews. The study shows that in general learners do not demonstrate autonomous language learning behaviour. They prefer learning English in a relaxed environment particularly by engaging in entertaining activities, and through note-taking. However, they do not have sufficient interaction with their facilitator, other learners or speakers. Although the participants are distance learners, they do not prefer Internet-based activities. Conditions stemming from adulthood, lack of skills necessary to perform an activity, lack of awareness of some activities and learners’ experiences in their previous years of education are some of the reasons for their unautonomous behaviour. The article also includes suggestions for teaching and future research.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ALTUNAY, D. (2013). Asist. Prof. Dr. Dilek ALTUNAY Mustafa Kemal University, Faculty of Science & Literature, English Language & Literature. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 4, 296–307. https://ajindex.com/articles/140403

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Altunay, D. & Mutlu, M. E. (2010).Use of ICT in Distance English Language Learning: A Study with Anadolu University, Open Education Faculty EFL Students. IODL & ICEM 2010
  2. Joint Conference and Media Days, October 6-8, 2010,
  3. Anadolu University Eskişehir, Turkey. Balcıkanlı, C. (2008). Fostering learner autonomy in EFL classrooms. Kastamonu Education Journal. 16(1).277-284
  4. Benson, P. & Lor, W. (1998). Making sense of autonomous language learning. English centre monograph 2. Hong Kong: The University of Hong Kong. Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. Harlow, Essex: Pearson Education. Candy, P. C. (1991). Self-direction for lifelong learning. A comprehensive guide to theory and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Chamot, A. U. (1993). Student responses to learning strategy instruction in the foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 26(3), 308–321.
  5. Cohen, A. D. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language. Harlow: Longman. Cotterall, S. (1999). Key variables in language learning: what do learners believe about them? System, 27, 493-513.
  6. Coban, Z. (2002). Attitudes towards learner autonomy in Gazi University and Yıldız Teknik University. Paper presented at the International INGED Conference on Interchanges and Exchanges: Current Trends in ELT, Metu, Ankara,
  7. Turkey. Dickinson, L. (1992). Learner training for language learning. Dublin: Authentik Language Learning Resources. Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2000). A transactional perspective on teaching and learning: A framework for adult and higher education. Oxford: Pergamon. Gomleksız, M.N & Bozpolat,E. (2012). İlköğretimde Yabancı Dil Öğreniminde Öğrenen Ozerkliği, Zeitschrift für die Welt der Türken /Journal of World of Turks, 4(3), 95-114.
  8. Gundogdu, K. (1997). Supporting pupil autonomy in one primary school applying the child-centered ethos: A case study. Unpublished Master’s thesis.University of Newcastle. Newcastle, England. Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy in foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon. Holmes, G. & Abington-Cooper, M. (2000). Pedagogy vs. andragogy: A false dichotomy? The Journal of Technology Studies, 26, 2. Retrieved May 17, 2013 from http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JTS/Summer-Fall-2000/holmes.html
  9. Hurd, S., Beaven, T. & Ortega, A. (2001). Developing autonomy in a distance language learning context: issues and dilemmas for course writers. System, 29(3), 341–355.
  10. Kaya, M. (2012). Uzaktan Eğitimde Öğrenenlerin Yabancı Dil Ogreni