KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2019 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 4

Online Examination Practices in Higher Education Institutions: Learners’ Perspectives

Khitam SHRAIM
Sayfa
185–196
Yayın Tarihi
2019-10-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The successful implementation of online exams depends on designing them to be valid, reliable, secure and flexible.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Online examinations, commonly known as electronic examinations (e-exams), are becoming increasingly implemented in higher education institutions in Palestine.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:An online questionnaire survey of 342 undergraduate students elicited their perceptions of the relative advantages of online examinations in terms of pedagogy, validity, reliability, affective factors, practicality and security.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The successful implementation of online exams depends on designing them to be valid, reliable, secure and flexible.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Online examinations · e-exams · higher education

Abstract

Online examinations, commonly known as electronic examinations (e-exams), are becoming increasingly implemented in higher education institutions in Palestine. However, learners’ perspectives on these exams remain unexplored. This study therefore examines learners’ perceptions of the online examination practices at Palestine Technical University-Kadoorie. An online questionnaire survey of 342 undergraduate students elicited their perceptions of the relative advantages of online examinations in terms of pedagogy, validity, reliability, affective factors, practicality and security. The results show that online exams were perceived to have significant benefits over traditional, paper-based examinations, including reliability of grading and efficiency in terms of time, effort and money spent on the exam process. Conversely, participants identified many challenges facing the successful implementation of online exams regarding security, validity and fairness issues. The findings also indicate that e-exams are particularly suitable for formative assessment, for measuring learning rather than the summative assessment of learning. The successful implementation of online exams depends on designing them to be valid, reliable, secure and flexible.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SHRAIM, K. (2019). Online Examination Practices in Higher Education Institutions: Learners’ Perspectives. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 4, 185–196. https://ajindex.com/articles/140354

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Al-Saleem, S.M. & Ullah, H. (2014). Security Considerations and Recommendations in Computer-Based Testing. The Scientific World Journal. Retrieved February 20, 2018 from https://www.hindawi. com/journals/tswj/2014/562787/. Ayo, C. K., Akinyemi, I. O.; Adebiyi, A. A. & Ekong, U. O.(2007). The prospects of e-examination implementation in Nigeria. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 8(4), 125-134.
  2. Anusha, N. S, Soujanya, T. S. & Vasavi, D. S. (2012). Study on techniques for providing enhanced security during online exams,” International Journal of Engineering Inventions, 1(1), 32–37.
  3. Baleni Z.(2015). Online formative assessment in higher education: Its pros and cons. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 13(4), 228-236.
  4. Bernik, I., & Jereb, E.(2006). Students’ Readiness for Electronic Examinations. Proceedings of the 5th WSEAS International Conference on Education and Educational Technology, Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain, December 16-18,2006 142-145.
  5. Chua, Y. P. C., & Don, Z. M.(2013). Effects of computer-based educational achievement test on test performance and test takers’ motivation. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(5), 1889–1895.
  6. Cook, J. & Jenkins, V. (2010). Getting Started with e-Assessment. University of Bath. Retrieved February 13, 2017 from http://opus.bath.ac.uk/17712/.
  7. Dermo, J.(2009). e‐Assessment and the student learning experience: A survey of student perceptions of e‐ assessment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(2), 203-214.
  8. Domino, G., & Domino, M. L. (2006). Psychological testing: An introduction. Cambridge University Press Cambridge. Dreher, C., Reiners, T., & Dreher, H. (2011). Investigating Factors Affecting the Uptake of Automated Assessment Technology. Journal of Information Technology Education,10, 161-181.
  9. Farzin, S.(2016). Attitude of Students Towards E-Examination System: an Application of E-Learning. Management Science and Information Technology, 1(2), 20-25.
  10. Ferrao, M. (2010). Eassessment within the Bologna Paradigm: Evidence from Portugal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35 (7),819–830.
  11. Gershon, R.C. (2005). Computer adaptive testing. Journal of Applied Measurement, 6 (1), 109–127.
  12. Heinrich, E., Milne, J., & Moore, M. (2009). An Investigation into E-Tool Use for Formative Assignment Assessment--Status and Recommendations. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 176–192. 196 Hodgson, P., & Pang, M. Y. C. (2012). Effective formative e-assessment of student learning: a study on a statistics cou